search for: testtrace

...C++/pointer_method2 SingleSource/Regression/C/PR10189 SingleSource/Regression/C/PR1386 SingleSource/Regression/C/PR491 SingleSource/Regression/C/PR640 SingleSource/Regression/C++/short_circuit_dtor SingleSource/Regression/C/sumarray SingleSource/Regression/C/sumarraymalloc SingleSource/Regression/C/testtrace SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-04-17-PrintfChar SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-ArgumentTest SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest1 SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest2 SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-02-CastTest3 SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-0...

...ngleSource/Regression/C/DuffsDevice | * | * | SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-21-BitfieldHandling | * | * | SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-22-LocalTypeTest | * | * | SingleSource/Regression/C/testtrace | * | * | SingleSource/Regression/C/sumarraymalloc | * | * | SingleSource/Regression/C/2005-05-06-LongLongSignedShift | * | * | SingleSource/Regression/C/sumarray2d...

...0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/test_indvars | 0.0125 1448 0.0076 * 0.0074 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/testtrace | 0.0076 1256 0.0056 * 0.0054 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-04-17-PrintfChar | 0.0027 540 0.0020 * 0....

...0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/test_indvars | 0.0080 1428 0.0040 * 0.0080 | 0.00 0.01 0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/testtrace | 0.0120 1240 0.0120 * 0.0080 | 0.01 0.00 0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-04-17-PrintfChar | 0.0040 524 0.0000 * 0....

LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When

...0.00 * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/test_indvars | 0.0120 1416 0.0078 * 0.0079 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/testtrace | 0.0078 1232 0.0052 * 0.0050 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-04-17-PrintfChar | 0.0058 532 0.0073 * 0....

...0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/test_indvars | 0.0052 1580 0.0033 * 0.0032 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/Regression/C/testtrace | 0.0032 1288 0.0029 * 0.0028 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-04-17-PrintfChar | 0.0011 564 0.0010 * 0....

...      0.02 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/test_indvars                                   | > 0.0000 1436     0.0000      *                0.0100      |    0.00    0.00 >  0.00 *           0.02 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/testtrace                                      | > 0.0100 1128     0.0000      *                0.0000      |    0.00    0.00 >  0.00 *           0.01 | -       -       n/a          n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-04-17-PrintfChar                             | > 0.0100 576      0.0000      *  ...

Hi Tanya, > 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects > directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a > pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note > that you need to

...- n/a n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/ > test_indvars | 0.0000 1436 > 0.0000 * 0.0100 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 > * 0.02 | - - n/a n/a > SingleSource/Regression/C/ > testtrace | 0.0100 1128 > 0.0000 * 0.0000 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 > * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a > SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-04-17- > PrintfChar | 0.0100 576 0.0000...

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download

LLVMers, 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community. http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. To test llvm-gcc: 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. 2) Run make check,

LLVMers, The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can). 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make

Hi Stepan, Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to improve MergeFunctions. Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its capability

...9 0 0.01 29598 0 0.01 29598 test2loop.ll 1 50498 0 0.01 50465 0 0.01 50465 testbench.ll 1 8198 0 0.01 8172 0 0.01 8172 test_indvars.ll 2 11043 0 0.01 11031 0 0.01 11031 test.ll 7 16845 0 0.01 16826 0 0.01 16826 testloop.ll 1 49203 0 0.01 49170 0 0.01 49170 TestLoop.ll 2 3938 0 0.01 3929 0 0.01 3929 testtrace.ll 3 7048 0 0.01 7036 0 0.01 7036 textloc.ll 13 155311 0 0.02 155289 0 0.02 155289 tf.ll 7 10532 0 0.01 10503 0 0.01 10503 tg.ll 2 22589 0 0.01 22560 0 0.01 22560 tgood.ll 9 106366 0 0.02 106335 0 0.01 106335 threading.ll 0 452 0 0.01 423 0 0.01 423 Threads.ll 17 20611 1 0.01 19977 1 0.01 19977 thr...