Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "testmissing".
2003 Dec 19
1
Missing arguments to new
Is this the expected and/or correct behaviour? And if
so, how do I persuade new to interpret a named but
missing argument as missing?
-------------
setClass("testMissing",representation(a="numeric"),prototype=list(a=0));
showMissing <- function(real.arg,missing.arg) {
really.missing <- new("testMissing");
show(really.missing);
really.there <- new("testMissing",a=1);
show(really.there);
arg.there <- new("...
2001 Oct 15
0
predict.fda difficulties
...um<-0
while(i<=100 & z<1000){
z<-z+1
TrainSample<-sample(1:TotalN,TrainN)
# Check to see if any CellTypes are missing from the training
# or test set as this will certainly cause an error.
TrainMissing<-any(table(DummyParams$CellType[TrainSample])==0)
TestMissing<-any(table(DummyParams$CellType[-TrainSample])==0)
if(!TrainMissing & !TestMissing){
TrainFDAs[[i]]<-fda(CellType~.,data=DummyParams[TrainSample,])
#Predict CellTypes of the test data set with the training set FDA
TP<-predict(TrainFDAs[[i]], DummyParams[-Tra...
2014 May 13
0
package compositions removed CRAN. Explain please the output?
...lapsed
SimulatedAmounts 18.810 0.188 19.064
rmahalanobis 8.573 0.016 8.619
replot 7.078 0.012 7.113
* checking for unstated dependencies in tests ... OK
* checking tests ...
Running ?AitchisonTest.R?
Running ?CheckGeometry.R? [38s/38s]
Running ?RobustTest.R?
Running ?TestMissing.R? [39s/40s]
Running ?TestSimp.R? [12s/12s]
Running ?acheck.R?
Running ?geostat.R?
Running ?missings.R?
Running ?quickcheck.R?
OK
* checking PDF version of manual ... OK
WARNING: There was 1 warning.
NOTE: There was 1 note.
See
?/tmp/compositions.Rcheck/00check.log?
for details....