search for: testmarkers

Hello, I noticed that option --keep-foreign-metadata discards WAV cue markers. Here is how to reproduce the bug: 1) Create a 24-bit 96khz in SoundForge8, add 20 seconds of silence, and add two markers with "m" key shortcut 2) Save it, compress it with "flac --keep-foreign-metadata testmarkers.wav" 3) Decompress it with "flac -d testmarkers.flac" 4) Open the decompressed WAV in SoundForge: the markers have disappeared. Here is the WAV containing markers: http://gget.it/q4uh4/testmarkers.zip Best regards, NC

My up-front apologies if this topic has been covered. This is my first time using this list and I don't know how to search for existing topics yet ... I installed Samba4 on Linux Slackware 64 version 14.1 about 6 months ago. I set up redirected folders for the Windows 7 Workstation users. All worked fine until recently. Now, when several of the users create documents and folders on their

I just noticed that my fresh install of Samba 4.2.3 has the same behaviour. I have a share (\\samba\it_share)) and some users when creating files have the UID as 3000000 and some have their correct UIDs. Share permissons are being controlled by Windows ACLs. On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Mark Foley <mfoley at novatec-inc.com> wrote: > More information, > > It appears I've

On 20/08/15 15:24, Mark Foley wrote: > Guilherme Boing, on 19 Aug 2015 14:31 you wrote: > >> I just noticed that my fresh install of Samba 4.2.3 has the same behaviour. > Did you get a solution? > > Odd, but this topic doesn't seem to be getting much traction. I wonder what > people are using Samba4 for. Outside of hard-cord samba-junkies who love > spending hours

>-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny >Verzonden: donderdag 20 augustus 2015 16:56 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Samba4 DC/AD documents created in >redirected folders with bogus UID > >On 20/08/15 15:24, Mark Foley wrote: >> Guilherme Boing, on 19 Aug 2015 14:31 you wrote:

More information, It appears I've had this issue since installing Samba 4.1.0 about 6 months ago. When I add a domain user, the DC resisdent redirected folder gets synchronized with the user's desktop with the correct UID. For some users, but not all, new "My Documents" get created with UID 3000000 on the DC, not the user's correct ID as shown by wbinfo. I haven't

On 20/08/15 18:26, Guilherme Boing wrote: > Yes, you are correct. > > The users where the UID 3000000 was the owner were users that belong to > Domain Admins group. > Is this the correct behaviour ? I have other users that are in different > groups (e.g. Marketing) and whenever they create a new file, their own UID > shows up as the owner of that file, not the

G'day list, It appears I got ahead of myself in believing I'd solved my CND (caller id) problem. My callerid.c change got it working on one of the handsets I have, but not the other. (Recap: The AU CND standard has an increased delay between the end of the ring signal and the start of the CND FSK data -- it's 500ms in US GR-30-CORE, and around 700ms in AU DC.002/TS030). I've

Guilherme Boing, on 19 Aug 2015 14:31 you wrote: > I just noticed that my fresh install of Samba 4.2.3 has the same behaviour. Did you get a solution? Odd, but this topic doesn't seem to be getting much traction. I wonder what people are using Samba4 for. Outside of hard-cord samba-junkies who love spending hours testing all kinds of esoteric features, I think most serious Samba4 AD/DC

>Those are the fundamentals. Other than Windows Authentication >and redirected >folders, I don't really see the point of Active Directory. I use Active Directory Group policies for: settings in windows folder redirects printer distribution base on user or group.. software installations base on user or group.. and Single Sign On for multple systems, windows and linux. a nice to

Oooo!! You may have something there! I don't know whether these users are in the admin group, but they could be. I have been messing around with admin priv in order to allow users to be admins on their own workstations. I've got a Group Policy method with computer startup script and have also created a login on the user's workstation with the same name as the user, but as local

Yes, you are correct. The users where the UID 3000000 was the owner were users that belong to Domain Admins group. Is this the correct behaviour ? I have other users that are in different groups (e.g. Marketing) and whenever they create a new file, their own UID shows up as the owner of that file, not the "Marketing" group. This only happens with Domain Admins ? Thanks. On Thu, Aug

Good to know that this is not a bug. Thank you! On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny241155 at gmail.com > wrote: > On 20/08/15 18:26, Guilherme Boing wrote: > >> Yes, you are correct. >> >> The users where the UID 3000000 was the owner were users that belong to >> Domain Admins group. >> Is this the correct behaviour ? I have