search for: testlv

...vsadm rules on piranha on same vip on 9004 port like below. 192.168.23.3:9004 ---->>192.168.17.16:9004 192.168.23.3:9004 ---->>192.168.17.17:9004 But i am getting below error on my syslog ################################################################################ Jul 21 20:25:38 testlvs nanny[5064]: starting LVS client monitor for 192.168.23.3:9004 Jul 21 20:25:38 testlvs nanny[5065]: starting LVS client monitor for 192.168.23.3:9004 Jul 21 20:25:43 testlvs pulse[5040]: gratuitous lvs arps finished Jul 21 20:25:47 testlvs nanny[5065]: READ from 192.168.17.16:9004 was too short Ju...

...g6 type 0 usb-storage: device scan complete [root at kasse ~]# pvcreate /dev/sdg1 Physical volume "/dev/sdg1" successfully created [root at kasse ~]# vgcreate testgroup /dev/sdg1 Volume group "testgroup" successfully created [root at kasse ~]# lvcreate -L 200M testgroup -n testLV Logical volume "testLV" created At this point, I have /dev/testgroup/testLV, which I can stick a fs on, mount, store files on, unmount, remount and recover the files from. Just as I'd expect. [root at kasse ~]# lvdisplay --- Logical volume --- LV Name /dev...

...cal, and since it's a laptop, I'm guessing it's not a > production machine), reboot from a livecd or whatever and doing e2fsk -f > /dev/lvmname/root > > I don't know if it will solve your issue, but may be worth trying. I found this: # lvextend -l +100%FREE /dev/myvg/testlv doing a search. What's the difference between 100%VG and 100%FREE? Thanks, -wes

...: May 19 16:27:28 xxxx kernel: sd 1:0:2:0: Attached scsi disk sdd Later on, when trying to run parted or friends, I see messages like so: May 23 11:22:47 xxxx kernel: scsi 1:0:2:0: rejecting I/O to dead device (note the same scsi address as sdc?) And pvdisplay says: # pvdisplay /dev/testVG/testLV: read failed after 0 of 4096 at 0: Input/output error That looks bad--it seems like testLV is trying to find the old LVM on /dev/sdc, but the array on sdd is there instead. Worse, I fear that trying to manipulate sdd may cause problems in the future, so am wary of doing anything with it before I...

On 05/06/2016 02:15 PM, Wes James wrote: > I found this: > > # lvextend -l +100%FREE /dev/myvg/testlv > > doing a search. What's the difference between 100%VG and 100%FREE? For the special case of "100%" there is no difference. For values less than 100% with a non-empty VG, the two are quite different, e.g., (50% of VG) != (50% of the free space in VG). -- Bob Nichols &q...

Hi 2 all ! I have problems with concurrent filesystem actions on a ocfs2 filesystem which is mounted by 2 nodes. OS=RH5ES and OCFS2=1.2.6 F.e.: If I have a LV called testlv which is mounted on /mnt on both servers and I do a "dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/test.a bs=1024 count=1000000" on server 1 and do at the same time a du -hs /mnt/test.a it takes about 5 seconds for du -hs to execute: 270M test.a real 0m3.627s user 0m0.000s sys 0m0.002s or even l...