search for: testinstance

Hi all, I am trying to implement an instruction with no operand for example "clr" in TableGen. ----------------------------------------- e.g. *InstrInfo.td:* class TestInst<string opc, string asmstr, dag oops, dag iops, list<dag> pattern> : Instruction { ... } def int_no_operand : Intrinsic<[]>; class ALU<string opc> : TestInst<opc,

On 11/6/2015 11:35 AM, Sky Flyer via llvm-dev wrote: > Guys, I stuck at this point. Could you please give me a hint how to > solve this problem without touching the LLVM backbone?! > Why LLVM doesn't let me define an instruction consisting of an operator > with no operand? Could you try it without the pattern? I.e. just this: class TestInst<string opc, string asmstr,

...licit connection closure"); > > connect.close(); > > Thread.*sleep*(5000); > > } *catch* (Exception e) { > > e.printStackTrace(); > > } > > } > > > *public* *static* *void* main(String[] args) *throws* Exception { > > LibvirtCrashTest testInstance = *new* LibvirtCrashTest(); > > > *for*(*int* counter = 0; counter < 3; counter++) { > > testInstance.createAndDestroyDefaultAuthConnection(); > > System.*out*.println("gc'ing"); > > System.*gc*(); > > System.*out*.println("gc'd"...

Dear all, I am trying to write an AsmParser and a CodeEmitter for simple ADD instruction. Here is what I have in the TestGenInstrInfo.td: *extern const MCInstrDesc TestInsts[] = {...{ 23, 3, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0x0ULL, nullptr, nullptr, OperandInfo13, 0, nullptr }, // Inst #23 = ADD8_rr...}* I parse the instruction successfully but I am not sure what I did wrong that the Size (as you can see in

On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 05:51:06PM +0200, Michal Prívozník wrote: > On 4/17/19 10:24 AM, Sachin Soman wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Could you tell me if the following is some known issue? > > > > While performing the following simple test, I see my JVM crashing > > (consistently): > > 1. Open a connection to an ESXi driver/host (passing ConnectAuthDefault

..."Explicit connection closure"); > > connect.close(); > > Thread.*sleep*(5000); > > } *catch* (Exception e) { > > e.printStackTrace(); > > } > > } > > > *public* *static* *void* main(String[] args) *throws* Exception { > > LibvirtCrashTest testInstance = *new* LibvirtCrashTest(); > > > *for*(*int* counter = 0; counter < 3; counter++) { > > testInstance.createAndDestroyDefaultAuthConnection(); > > System.*out*.println("gc'ing"); > > System.*gc*(); > > System.*out*.println("gc'd"); &gt...

...t;> > } *catch* (Exception e) { >> > >> > e.printStackTrace(); >> > >> > } >> > >> > } >> > >> > >> > *public* *static* *void* main(String[] args) *throws* Exception { >> > >> > LibvirtCrashTest testInstance = *new* LibvirtCrashTest(); >> > >> > >> > *for*(*int* counter = 0; counter < 3; counter++) { >> > >> > testInstance.createAndDestroyDefaultAuthConnection(); >> > >> > System.*out*.println("gc'ing"); >> > >&...

....x/?no_verify=1", ca, 0); Thread.*sleep*(1000); System.*out*.println("Explicit connection closure"); connect.close(); Thread.*sleep*(5000); } *catch* (Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); } } *public* *static* *void* main(String[] args) *throws* Exception { LibvirtCrashTest testInstance = *new* LibvirtCrashTest(); *for*(*int* counter = 0; counter < 3; counter++) { testInstance.createAndDestroyDefaultAuthConnection(); System.*out*.println("gc'ing"); System.*gc*(); System.*out*.println("gc'd"); *int* tCounter = 0; *while*(tCounter++ < 20) {...

...gt; > > Thread.*sleep*(5000); > > > > } *catch* (Exception e) { > > > > e.printStackTrace(); > > > > } > > > > } > > > > > > *public* *static* *void* main(String[] args) *throws* Exception { > > > > LibvirtCrashTest testInstance = *new* LibvirtCrashTest(); > > > > > > *for*(*int* counter = 0; counter < 3; counter++) { > > > > testInstance.createAndDestroyDefaultAuthConnection(); > > > > System.*out*.println("gc'ing"); > > > > System.*gc*(); > > &g...

Hi Andy and all, I have a question about per-operand machine model. I am finding some relations between 'MCWriteLatencyEntry' and 'MCWriteProcResEntry'. For example, class InstTEST<..., InstrItinClass itin> : Instruction { let Itinerary = Itin; } // I assume this MI writes 2 registers. def TESTINST : InstTEST<..., II_TEST> // schedule info II_TEST:

...t;> > >>> > e.printStackTrace(); >>> > >>> > } >>> > >>> > } >>> > >>> > >>> > *public* *static* *void* main(String[] args) *throws* Exception { >>> > >>> > LibvirtCrashTest testInstance = *new* LibvirtCrashTest(); >>> > >>> > >>> > *for*(*int* counter = 0; counter < 3; counter++) { >>> > >>> > testInstance.createAndDestroyDefaultAuthConnection(); >>> > >>> > System.*out*.println("gc'ing...

Hi, I run the "Unit testing", Then The "Actionview::Testcase" is failed. i.e i am getting the error as below, 1) Error: test_tablename(ActionView::TestCase): TypeError: wrong argument type Class (expected Module) /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/helpers.rb:76:in `include''

Hi, We've been working for the last two years on support for ARM's Scalable Vector Extension in LLVM, and we'd like to upstream our work. We've had to make several design decisions without community input, and would like to discuss the major changes we've made. To help with the discussions, I've attached a technical document (also in plain text below) to describe the