Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "testexcept".
Did you mean:
test_except
2011 Mar 09
0
java+R+serverEval failed+request status: control pipe to master process is closed/broken
...contamination from previous tests
c.serverEval("xXx<-'" + key + "'");
c.close();
c = new RConnection();
REXP x = c.eval("xXx");
if (x == null || !x.isString() || x.length() != 1 || !x.asString().equals(key))
throw new TestException("control eval test failed - assignment was not persistent");
c.serverEval("rm(xXx)"); // remove the test variable to not pollute the global workspace
System.out.println(" server shutdown");
c.serverShutdown();
c.close();
Syste...
2010 Dec 02
0
[LLVMdev] Alternative exception handling proposal
...e (on Darwin at least). It will crash libunwind because it was doing horrible things:
#import <Foundation/Foundation.h>
int main (int argc, const char * argv[]) {
NSAutoreleasePool * pool = [[NSAutoreleasePool alloc] init];
@try {
@throw [NSException exceptionWithName:@"TestException" reason:@"Test" userInfo:nil];
}
@catch (NSException *e) {
@throw e;
}
[pool drain];
return 0;
}
-bw
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/2010120...
2010 Dec 03
1
[LLVMdev] Alternative exception handling proposal
.... It will crash libunwind because it was doing horrible things:
>
> #import <Foundation/Foundation.h>
>
> int main (int argc, const char * argv[]) {
> NSAutoreleasePool * pool = [[NSAutoreleasePool alloc] init];
>
> @try {
> @throw [NSException exceptionWithName:@"TestException" reason:@"Test" userInfo:nil];
> }
> @catch (NSException *e) {
> @throw e;
> }
>
>
> [pool drain];
> return 0;
> }
I was unable to compile this (I don't have Foundation). However as my scheme
generates identical unwind tables to gcc (this is the wh...
2010 Dec 02
3
[LLVMdev] Alternative exception handling proposal
Hi Bill,
> This is similar to my first proposal.
yup, I still consider your first proposal to have been basically sound.
But it also suffers from a major problem,
> which stopped that proposal dead in its tracks. Namely, you have information in
> one place which needs to be shared in two different, but possibly disjoint,
> places: the type, filters, and personality information. In