search for: testenviron

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "testenviron".

2003 Dec 02
2
Problem with , in Common Name when running samba3 as ADS Member (Problem with Group-Contents)
...00\00\00\00\05\15\00\00\00\4B\1B\4B\1F\92\47\07\1C\BC\6C\82\00\01\02\00\00) gave 1 replies [2003/12/02 12:24:24, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_ads.c:dn_lookup(361) ads: dn_lookup [2003/12/02 12:24:24, 5] libads/ldap_utils.c:ads_do_search_retry(52) Search for (distinguishedName=CN=FIBU HSt,OU=Benutzer,DC=testenvironment,DC=millenux,DC=de) gave 1 replies [2003/12/02 12:24:24, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_ads.c:dn_lookup(361) ads: dn_lookup [2003/12/02 12:24:24, 5] libads/ldap_utils.c:ads_do_search_retry(52) Search for (distinguishedName=CN=Steinle Solution Factory,OU=Benutzer,DC=testenvironment,DC=millenux,DC=de) g...
2002 Jun 13
1
with ldap - samba - password sync - domain group map - login message
...mponents myself!). the second was with suse linux 8.0 with openldap, pam_ldap, nss_ldap (this three components are the standard rpm's from suse 8.0) and samba 2.2.4 (latest rpm from the suse samba-developer). the basic systems worked and all problems i'm going to describe occurred in both testenvironments! 1. after login from w2k i get the message, that the password expires and asks me if i want to change. if i change or not, at next logon the situation is the same, but i can login over a few weeks without passwordchange. - the only information i found about in the web is, that i can set th...
2018 Jan 29
0
geo-replication command rsync returned with 3
Hi all, by downgrade of ii? libc6:amd64 2.23-0ubuntu10 to ii? libc6:amd64 2.23-0ubuntu3 the problem was solved. at least in gfs testenvironment running gfs 3.13.2 and 3.7.20 and on our productive environment with 3.7.18. possibly it helps someone... best regards Dietmar Am 25.01.2018 um 14:06 schrieb Dietmar Putz: > > Hi Kotresh, > > thanks for your response... > > i have made further tests based on ubuntu 16.04...
2018 Jan 25
2
geo-replication command rsync returned with 3
Hi Kotresh, thanks for your response... i have made further tests based on ubuntu 16.04.3 (latest upgrades) and gfs 3.12.5 with following rsync version : 1. ii? rsync????????????????????????????? 3.1.1-3ubuntu1 2. ii? rsync????????????????????????????? 3.1.1-3ubuntu1.2 3. ii? rsync????????????????????????????? 3.1.2-2ubuntu0.1 in each test all nodes had the same rsync version installed. all