search for: testdc1

Hi Rowland! Yes there are samba packages installed: [root at testdc1 ~]# rpm -qa | grep samba samba-client-libs-4.6.2-11.el7_4.x86_64 samba-winbind-modules-4.6.2-11.el7_4.x86_64 samba-common-libs-4.6.2-11.el7_4.x86_64 samba-common-4.6.2-11.el7_4.noarch samba-common-tools-4.6.2-11.el7_4.x86_64 samba-libs-4.6.2-11.el7_4.x86_64 And there are seven zones because of /et...

...artPre=/bin/bash -c if [ ! "$DISABLE_ZONE_CHECKING" == "yes" ]; then /usr/sbin/named-checkconf -z "$NAMEDCONF"; else echo "Checking of zone files is disabled"; fi (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) Main PID: 8949 (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) Nov 24 21:58:41 testdc1.mytestdom.testsamba.com named[9323]: listening on IPv6 interface lo, ::1#53 Nov 24 21:58:41 testdc1.mytestdom.testsamba.com named[9323]: generating session key for dynamic DNS Nov 24 21:58:41 testdc1.mytestdom.testsamba.com named[9323]: sizing zone task pool based on 7 zones Nov 24 21:58:41 testdc1...

Hi Rowland! I've uninstalled the samba packages and their dependencies, and now the error is: Nov 24 23:29:16 testdc1.mytestdom.testsamba.com named[9501]: samba_dlz: Failed to connect to /usr/local/samba/private/dns/sam.ldb Nov 24 23:29:16 testdc1.mytestdom.testsamba.com named[9501]: dlz_dlopen of 'AD DNS Zone' failed Nov 24 23:29:16 testdc1.mytestdom.testsamba.com named[9501]: SDLZ driver failed to load....

...'+winbind -winbindd' to 'server services =' in smb.conf > > OK, I have a couple VMs running Debian Wheezy with Sernet Samba 4.2.1 These are running as a test domain with two DCs, both are using the built-in dns server and winbindd. If I check smb.conf on both DCs: root at testdc1:~# cat /etc/samba/smb.conf # Global parameters [global] workgroup = SAMBADOM realm = SAMBADOM.EXAMPLE.COM netbios name = TESTDC1 server role = active directory domain controller dns forwarder = 8.8.8.8 idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes load printers = no printing =...

Am 17.12.2015 um 16:10 schrieb Rowland penny: > On 17/12/15 14:56, Ole Traupe wrote: >> >> >> Am 17.12.2015 um 15:33 schrieb Rowland penny: >>> On 17/12/15 13:54, Ole Traupe wrote: >>>> Rowland, thank you, but before we do that: >>>> >>>> - what now with the 'gc' record? 2nd DC yes or no? >>> >>> Which one

...that! > > OK, before I did anything else this morning, I started up my test domain. Note that this domain only existed to try and find out why the second DC didn't have a NS record in the SOA and uses the internal dns. Both of the DCs have the relevant line in the hosts file: root at testdc1:~# nano /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost 192.168.0.240 testdc1.home.lan testdc1 root at testdc2:~# nano /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost 192.168.0.241 testdc2.home.lan testdc2 Both of the DCs point to each other as their nameserver: root at testdc1:~# nano /etc/resol...

...ices =' in smb.conf >> >> > > OK, I have a couple VMs running Debian Wheezy with Sernet Samba 4.2.1 > > These are running as a test domain with two DCs, both are using the built-in > dns server and winbindd. > > If I check smb.conf on both DCs: > > root at testdc1:~# cat /etc/samba/smb.conf > # Global parameters > [global] > workgroup = SAMBADOM > realm = SAMBADOM.EXAMPLE.COM > netbios name = TESTDC1 > server role = active directory domain controller > dns forwarder = 8.8.8.8 > idmap_ldb:use rfc2307 = yes >...

...; "$DISABLE_ZONE_CHECKING" == "yes" ]; then /usr/sbin/named-checkconf -z > "$NAMEDCONF"; else echo "Checking of zone files is disabled"; fi > (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) > Main PID: 8949 (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS) > > Nov 24 21:58:41 testdc1.mytestdom.testsamba.com named[9323]: listening > on IPv6 interface lo, ::1#53 > Nov 24 21:58:41 testdc1.mytestdom.testsamba.com named[9323]: > generating session key for dynamic DNS > Nov 24 21:58:41 testdc1.mytestdom.testsamba.com named[9323]: sizing > zone task pool based on 7 zone...

...; >>> >> OK, I have a couple VMs running Debian Wheezy with Sernet Samba 4.2.1 >> >> These are running as a test domain with two DCs, both are using the built-in >> dns server and winbindd. >> >> If I check smb.conf on both DCs: >> >> root at testdc1:~# cat /etc/samba/smb.conf >> # Global parameters >> [global] >> workgroup = SAMBADOM >> realm = SAMBADOM.EXAMPLE.COM >> netbios name = TESTDC1 >> server role = active directory domain controller >> dns forwarder = 8.8.8.8 >>...

...I did anything else this morning, I started up my test > domain. Note that this domain only existed to try and find out why the > second DC didn't have a NS record in the SOA and uses the internal dns. > > Both of the DCs have the relevant line in the hosts file: > > root at testdc1:~# nano /etc/hosts > > 127.0.0.1 localhost > 192.168.0.240 testdc1.home.lan testdc1 > > root at testdc2:~# nano /etc/hosts > > 127.0.0.1 localhost > 192.168.0.241 testdc2.home.lan testdc2 > > > Both of the DCs point to each other as the...

On 13/06/15 11:00, Jonathan Hunter wrote: > On 13 June 2015 at 09:34, buhorojo <buhorojo.lcb at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 12 June 2015 at 08:55, Jonathan Hunter <jmhunter1 at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Sadly, even though sssd is now running and I'm no longer reliant on >>> winbind, the rest of samba doesn't seem to be taking notice of these >>>

...this, it just needs three line adding to > dns_update_list. > > Rowland > If anybody is interested, this is the results of my testing, first here are the results of adding an NS record to the dns domain SOA record for the second DC on a domain using the internal dns server: root at testdc1:~# dig SOA +multiline home.lan ; <<>> DiG 9.9.5-4~bpo70+1-Debian <<>> SOA +multiline home.lan ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 10153 ;; flags: qr aa rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL...

...t;> dns_update_list. >> >> Rowland >> > > If anybody is interested, this is the results of my testing, first > here are the results of adding an NS record to the dns domain SOA > record for the second DC on a domain using the internal dns server: > > root at testdc1:~# dig SOA +multiline home.lan > > ; <<>> DiG 9.9.5-4~bpo70+1-Debian <<>> SOA +multiline home.lan > ;; global options: +cmd > ;; Got answer: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 10153 > ;; flags: qr aa rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER...

Hai, Ah, ok, wel, yeah, i was missing the NS on the SOA. This is imo a bug, i dont know it this is by design for samba, so maybe a samba dev can answere this since every joined DC should have a NS record on the SOA as far as i know, but thats my opinion and i can be wrong here. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at

On 2015-06-16 19:39, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 16/06/15 04:03, Brady, Mike wrote: >> With the switch to using winbindd on Domain Controllers in 4.2, should >> a getent passwd now be showing the home directory and shell that is in >> the RFC2307 attributes in the directory like a member server does? > > No, the 'winbindd' change hasn't altered anything

...>>> Rowland >>> >> >> If anybody is interested, this is the results of my testing, first >> here are the results of adding an NS record to the dns domain SOA >> record for the second DC on a domain using the internal dns server: >> >> root at testdc1:~# dig SOA +multiline home.lan >> >> ; <<>> DiG 9.9.5-4~bpo70+1-Debian <<>> SOA +multiline home.lan >> ;; global options: +cmd >> ;; Got answer: >> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 10153 >> ;; flags: qr aa rd...

...t; https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-December/196367.html > > i just want to see how a "dig SOA example.lan." would look like to > contain two nameservers, that below form the thread is as always a SOA > containing one origin > > example.lan > origin = testdc1.example.lan > mail addr = hostmaster.example.lan > serial = 3 > refresh = 900 > retry = 600 > expire = 86400 > minimum = 3600 > > > OK, your wish is my command :-) root at dc1:~# dig SOA samdom.example.com ; <<>> DiG 9.9.5-9+de...

Hello! I have 2 Samba 4 server (4.3.3) as VC and other Samba 4 (4.3) as Fileserver, until now all ok, but I'm one doubts, how to validate that in both servers the domain IDs of the users of this identical, a simple way to do this validation? I wanted to make sure it is a DC die fileserver has to go 100%. thank you

On 29/02/16 09:42, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 29.02.2016 um 10:10 schrieb Rowland penny: >> Everything you say is valid except for when it comes to AD dns. >> When you want data from a zone, you start with the SOA record, you ask >> 'who holds the records for this zone?', it replies with the nameserver >> that holds the zone records. OK so far ? >>

...> >> instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba > > > > > > Hi Louis, you keep saying adding the domain member lines to a DC works > for you, so I thought it was time I tried them again. > > This is before adding the lines: > > root at testdc1:~# getent passwd rowland > HOME\rowland:*:10000:10000:Rowland Penny:/home/HOME/rowland:/bin/false > > Now add the lines to smb.conf: > > ## map id's outside to domain to tdb files. > idmap config * : backend = tdb > idmap config * : range = 2000...