search for: testcase

Hi, The 6.0.1-rc2 release has been tagged. Testers may begin testing and reporting results. -Tom

Hi, I've just tagged the 6.0.1-rc1 release. Testers may begin testing and uploading binaries. Also, any tester who has not tested 5.0.2-rc1 and would like to do so please try to do this before Friday, because I would like to tag 5.0.2-final then. As a reminder to users and developers, May 18 is the deadline for submitting merge requests for 6.0.1, so there is still time to get bug fixes

...er-Unit :: ./Asan-x86_64-inline-Test/AddressSanitizer.UseThenFreeThenUseTest AddressSanitizer-Unit :: ./Asan-x86_64-inline-Test/AddressSanitizer.WrongFreeTest AddressSanitizer-Unit :: ./Asan-x86_64-inline-Test/AddressSanitizerInterface.HandleNoReturnTest AddressSanitizer-i386-freebsd :: TestCases/Posix/asan-sigbus.cpp AddressSanitizer-i386-freebsd :: TestCases/Posix/asan-symbolize-sanity-test.cc AddressSanitizer-i386-freebsd :: TestCases/Posix/closed-fds.cc AddressSanitizer-i386-freebsd :: TestCases/Posix/deep_thread_stack.cc AddressSanitizer-i386-freebsd :: TestCases/Posix...

On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:43 PM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: > On 7 Feb 2018, at 21:51, Hans Wennborg via Release-testers <release-testers at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> There's been a lot of merges since rc1, and hopefully the tests are in >> a better state now. >> >> 6.0.0-rc2 was just tagged, after r324506. >> >>

...Test (2833 of 38616) > FAIL: AddressSanitizer-Unit :: ./Asan-x86_64-with-calls-Test/AddressSanitizer.UseThenFreeThenUseTest (2870 of 38616) > FAIL: AddressSanitizer-Unit :: ./Asan-x86_64-with-calls-Test/AddressSanitizer.WrongFreeTest (2875 of 38616) > FAIL: AddressSanitizer-i386-freebsd :: TestCases/Posix/asan-sigbus.cpp (2998 of 38616) > FAIL: AddressSanitizer-i386-freebsd :: TestCases/Posix/asan-symbolize-sanity-test.cc (3000 of 38616) > FAIL: AddressSanitizer-i386-freebsd :: TestCases/Posix/closed-fds.cc (3001 of 38616) > FAIL: AddressSanitizer-i386-freebsd :: TestCases/Posix/deep...

Dear testers, 5.0.0-rc1 has just been tagged. Please build, test and upload binaries to the sftp. Let me know if there are any issues. I'll upload sources, docs, and your binaries to the pre-release website once they're ready. Thanks, Hans

Bill, For some reason the llvm-symbolizer tests fail on ppc: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64le-linux/builds/182/steps/ninja%20check%201/logs/stdio because it can't be started: /home/buildbots/ppc64le-clang-test/clang-ppc64le/stage1/./bin/llvm-symbolizer: /lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.21' not found (required by

Hi, I've just tagged LLVM 9.0.1-rc3. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. This will be the last release candidate unless there is a major problem. I'm planning to tag the final release on Dec 19. -Tom

On 31 Jul 2017, at 19:26, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 4:59 AM, Dimitry Andric <dimitry at andric.com> wrote: >> On 27 Jul 2017, at 00:41, Hans Wennborg via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >>> >>> 5.0.0-rc1 has just been tagged. >>> >>> Please build, test and upload binaries

...rtions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/ruby/t/tc_010_load.rb b/ruby/t/tc_010_load.rb index 2ec0314..06922e1 100644 --- a/ruby/t/tc_010_load.rb +++ b/ruby/t/tc_010_load.rb @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ require File::join(File::dirname(__FILE__), 'test_helper') -class TestLoad < MiniTest::Unit::TestCase - def test_load +class Test010Load < MiniTest::Unit::TestCase + def test_010_load end end diff --git a/ruby/t/tc_020_create.rb b/ruby/t/tc_020_create.rb index a2a01a1..251512b 100644 --- a/ruby/t/tc_020_create.rb +++ b/ruby/t/tc_020_create.rb @@ -17,8 +17,8 @@ require File::join(File::d...

Hi, I have just tagged 3.7.1-rc1, so it is ready for testing. As a reminder, when doing regression testing, use the 3.7.0 release as your baseline. Thanks, Tom

Hi, I've tagged the LLVM 9.0.1-rc1 release. Testers can begin testing and upload binaries. I've also updated the test-release.sh script to pull from GitHub instead of SVN, if you run into any issues with the new script, let me know. -Tom

Hi, I've just tagged the 9.0.1-final release. Testers can begin uploading binaries. -Tom

Hi, I've tagged LLVM 9.0.1-rc2. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. If all goes well, this will be the last -rc. -Tom

--- generator/ruby.ml | 12 +++++++----- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/generator/ruby.ml b/generator/ruby.ml index 97ccfdc..0f71ccc 100644 --- a/generator/ruby.ml +++ b/generator/ruby.ml @@ -404,15 +404,17 @@ event_callback_wrapper_wrapper (VALUE argvv) return Qnil; } +/* Callbacks aren't supposed to throw exceptions. We just print the + * exception on

I upgraded a working app from rails 2.1 to 2.3.2. Now when I run rake test:units I get this error: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ activesupport-2.3.2/lib/active_support/test_case.rb:17: superclass mismatch for class TestCase (TypeError) I generated a new test app and all tests run OK. For the upgrade I ran rake:update and renamed the class in test_helper to ActiveSupport::TestCase. Also renamed the classes in all unit tests and to inherit from ActiveSupport::TestCase and in functional tests to inherit from ActionCont...

Dear R-help folks, I am seeing unexpected behaviour from the function mean with option na.rm =TRUE (which is removing a whole column of a data frame or matrix. example: testcase <- data.frame( x = 1:3, y = rep(NA,3)) mean(testcase[,1], na.rm=TRUE) [1] 2 mean(testcase[,2], na.rm = TRUE) [1] NaN OK, so far that seems sensible. Now I'd like to compute both means at once: lapply(testcase, mean, na.rm=T) ## this works $x [1] 2 $y [1] NaN But I thought that...

A bunch of controllers were not extending ActionController::TestCase, and instead were just using the basic test/unit testcase, so we were not getting some of the rails baked-in stuff. Signed-off-by: Jason Guiditta <jguiditt at redhat.com> --- src/test/functional/host_controller_test.rb | 2 +- src/test/functional/nic_controller_test.rb |...

Hi, I have a simple model and written a testcase. class Product < ActiveRecord::Base validates_presense_of :name end ------------- class ProductTest < Test::Unit::TestCase fixtures :products def test_invalid product = Product.new assert !product.valid? end end ------------- The testcase fails with a message, <false>...

...where tcp dpt:netbios-ns reject-with icmp-port-unreachable REJECT udp -- anywhere anywhere udp dpt:netbios-ns reject-with icmp-port-unreachable And the test suite: # ./iptables/tests/shell/run-tests.sh I: [OK] ././iptables/tests/shell/testcases/chain/0001duplicate_1 I: [OK] ././iptables/tests/shell/testcases/chain/0002newchain_0 I: [OK] ././iptables/tests/shell/testcases/chain/0003rename_1 I: [OK] ././iptables/tests/shell/testcases/ebtables/0001-ebtables- basic_0 I: [OK] ././iptables/te...