search for: testacc7700905

...5:51] [Aug 9 22:15:51] [Aug 9 22:15:51] <------------> [Aug 9 22:15:51] -- Executing [419 at testwebrtc:1] NoOp("SIP/770000wrtc-00000002", "") in new stack [Aug 9 22:15:51] -- Executing [419 at testwebrtc:4] Dial("SIP/770000wrtc-00000002", "SIP/testacc7700905") in new stack [Aug 9 22:15:51] == Using SIP RTP TOS bits 184 [Aug 9 22:15:51] == Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5 [Aug 9 22:15:51] -- Called SIP/testacc7700905 [Aug 9 22:15:51] -- SIP/testacc7700905-00000003 is ringing [Aug 9 22:15:51] [Aug 9 22:15:51] <--- Transmitting (NAT) to...

...ct: <sip:419 at 178.18.90.230:5060;transport=WS> [Aug 11 15:53:47] Content-Length: 0 [Aug 11 15:53:47] [Aug 11 15:53:47] [Aug 11 15:53:47] <------------> [Aug 11 15:53:47] == Using SIP RTP TOS bits 184 [Aug 11 15:53:47] == Using SIP RTP CoS mark 5 [Aug 11 15:53:47] -- Called SIP/testacc7700905 [Aug 11 15:53:48] -- SIP/testacc7700905-00000001 is ringing [Aug 11 15:53:48] [Aug 11 15:53:48] <--- Transmitting (NAT) to 178.119.146.190:60191 ---> [Aug 11 15:53:48] SIP/2.0 180 Ringing [Aug 11 15:53:48] Via: SIP/2.0/WSS df7jal23ls0d.invalid;branch=z9hG4bKSqKu6K3uxr3dOFdU5WAtPM5tKKA5yz...

Hello thank you for your answer. I don't understand how there are many tutorials and examples on the web where every time the outcome is a working setup. Very strange I feel now after my personal experience with Asterisk 11 and webRTC. You also say Asterisk 13. How about Asterisk 12 then ?? Kind regards. On 10-08-16 21:53, Matt Fredrickson wrote: > I don't see an ice-ufrag or