search for: test_unit_sourc

Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "test_unit_sourc".

Did you mean: test_unit_sources
2004 Sep 10
2
-lm ordering
...1 +++ src/test_unit/Makefile.am Tue Aug 28 16:22:05 2001 @@ -19,8 +19,7 @@ INCLUDES = -I$(top_srcdir)/src/libFLAC/include noinst_PROGRAMS = test_unit -test_unit_LDFLAGS = -lm -test_unit_LDADD = $(top_builddir)/src/libFLAC/libFLAC.la +test_unit_LDADD = $(top_builddir)/src/libFLAC/libFLAC.la -lm test_unit_SOURCES = \ bitbuffer.c \ main.c \ -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de
2004 Sep 10
2
1.0 candidate checked in
...to src/test_unit/main.c since it looks wrong. main.c is supposed to include > the local bitbuffer.h, not src/libFLAC/private/bitbuffer.h; I think the > current version is correct. Ah, I missed that there was a local bitbuffer.h. In that case, what I should have done was add bitbuffer.h to test_unit_SOURCES. > 6. 'Improved' the flac.sgml rule to fall back to docbook2man if there's no > docbook-to-man (this should really be handled in configure.in). > > I hope this is all correct! I had do go back and reread the last 40 mails to > make sure. Everything is checked in to...
2004 Sep 10
5
1.0 candidate checked in
On Sat, Jul 21, 2001 at 04:06:14PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > Argh. Maybe libtool will have to get involved after all. I'll work on it > this afternoon. I think I give up. automake and libtool assume that the compiler will be able to assemble stuff, and compilers don't generally understand NASM input. I don't like the strip_fPIC bit, since just about anything that could