Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "test_tree".
2005 Jan 25
3
multi-class classification using rpart
...I used my small-sampled data as below, the program seems
to take forever. I am not sure if it is due to slowness or there is
something wrong with my codes or data manipulation.
Please be advised !
The data is described as the output from str() function. The call to
rpart is like:
library(rpart)
test_tree<-rpart(x$V142 ~ ., data=x, parms=list(split='gini'), cp =0.01)
the response variable is $V142, with 3 levels.
Thanks for your suggestions!
Ed.
> str(x)
`data.frame': 500 obs. of 142 variables
$ V1 : int 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 ...
$ V2 : Factor w/ 8 levels "1",&q...
2016 Dec 09
0
BSWAP matching in codegen
...exercise the cascade pattern, and I remember now our fix is
> confined to the tree case.
>
> I hesitate to claim now that there’s no coverage for the tree pattern,
> but it is failing to match the patterns we use in our tests, one of
> which looks like this:
>
> define i32 @test_tree(i32 %x) {
>
> %byte0 = and i32 %x, 255 ; 0x000000ff
>
> %byte1 = and i32 %x, 65280 ; 0x0000ff00
>
> %byte2 = and i32 %x, 16711680 ; 0x00ff0000
>
> %byte3 = and i32 %x, 4278190080 ; 0xff000000
>
> %tmp0 = shl i32 %byte0, 8
>
> %tmp1 = lshr...
2005 Jan 25
0
Collapsing solution to the question discussed above: Re: multi-class classification using rpart
...wrong with my codes or data manipulation.
> >>>
> >>>Please be advised !
> >>>
> >>>The data is described as the output from str() function. The call to
> >>>rpart is like:
> >>>
> >>>library(rpart)
> >>>test_tree<-rpart(x$V142 ~ ., data=x,
> >>>parms=list(split='gini'), cp =0.01)
> >>>
> >>>the response variable is $V142, with 3 levels.
> >>>
> >>>Thanks for your suggestions!
> >>>
> >>>Ed.
> >>
> >...
2016 Dec 08
2
BSWAP matching in codegen
>> Are you sure there isn't any test coverage? As far as I can tell, the tests from https://reviews.llvm.org/rL133503 are still in the tree.
I looked at those, but none of them include the full pattern that decomposes into bswap and rol. I debugged through the X86 bswap.ll test and verified none of those cases make it through MatchBSwapHWord (they get handled in MatchBSwapHWordLow