search for: test_samples

Hi, Thanks for your reply. I just came up with another question about a similar but different thing: Say I have a bunch of data.frame variables named P1,P2,P3? I want to assign them row names according to symbols in the first column, and I want to do this using a for loop. How could I accomplish this? for (test_sample in c(1:10)){ +

Hi Ruiyang, I think you want "get": For (index in seq(1,16)){ plot(x=(a given set of value),y=get(paste(?PC?,as.character(index),sep=??))) } On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 7:43 AM, ??? <ruiyangliu94 at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > Suppose that I want to do a series of plots with the y value for each plot as PC1, PC2, PC3? How could I accomplish this using a for loop? > Suppose the

Hi, Suppose that I want to do a series of plots with the y value for each plot as PC1, PC2, PC3? How could I accomplish this using a for loop? Suppose the code like this: For (index in seq(1,16)){ plot(x=(a given set of value),y=paste(?PC?,as.character(index),sep=??) } But this would not work because y is assigned a string instead of the variable names. So how could I assign y with a variable

Hi all, Is there a standard set of wave files for testing the quality of the output of oggenc? Ronald ---------------------------------------------- Philips Research Laboratories -- Building WDC <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to

Hallo, I have a table like this: create table properties( id bigint unsigned not null auto_increment, property_variable_stack_id bigint unsigned not null, primary key(id), foreign key (property_variable_stack_id) references property_variable_stacks (id)) type=InnoDB; Here you can see a reference to a table property_variable_stacks. >From outside the Property class I can set up a Property with

Hi, I am currently find myself selecting manually amoungts several hundreds Google Alerts (GA) texts those that are indeed relevant for my research vs those which are not (despite they are triggered by some relevant seach keywords). Basically each week I get several hundreds GA email such as:

Hi, On 20-11-15 17:07, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: > > > On 11/20/2015 11:36 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi Samual, et al, > > Hi Hans, > >> >> In >> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau?id=ff72440b40211326eda118232fabd53965410afd >> >> you write: "This compute support has been tested by >> Pierre

Hi, On 26-11-15 09:42, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: > Well, if you remove that assert locally, all compute tests in src/gallium/tests/trivial/compute.c pass on GK106, except the atomic ones. Do you mean the: Assertion `pres->target != PIPE_BUFFER' failed. or the: Assertion `tex->defExists(0) && tex->srcExists(0)' failed. assert? Or is the first one not present for

Well, if you remove that assert locally, all compute tests in src/gallium/tests/trivial/compute.c pass on GK106, except the atomic ones. I'm working on the fermi case btw. On 11/25/2015 03:43 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 20-11-15 17:07, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: >> >> >> On 11/20/2015 11:36 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: >>> Hi Samual, et al, >>

On 11/26/2015 01:21 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 26-11-15 09:42, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: >> Well, if you remove that assert locally, all compute tests in >> src/gallium/tests/trivial/compute.c pass on GK106, except the atomic >> ones. > > Do you mean the: > > Assertion `pres->target != PIPE_BUFFER' failed. > > or the: > >

On 11/25/2015 03:43 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 20-11-15 17:07, Samuel Pitoiset wrote: >> >> >> On 11/20/2015 11:36 AM, Hans de Goede wrote: >>> Hi Samual, et al, >> >> Hi Hans, >> >>> >>> In >>>

Hi Samual, et al, In http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau?id=ff72440b40211326eda118232fabd53965410afd you write: "This compute support has been tested by Pierre Moreau and myself with some compute kernels." Can you provide testing instructions (and the necessary files) so that I can try to reproduce your tests ? And once I've reproduced your