search for: test_port

...st-exec.sh: if [ ! -z "$TEST_SSH_PORT" ]; then PORT="$TEST_SSH_PORT" else PORT=4242 fi could be something similar to: if [ ! -z "$TEST_SSH_PORT" ]; then PORT="$TEST_SSH_PORT" else first_port=4200 last_port=4300 test_port=$first_port while [ "$test_port" -le "$last_port" ]; do netstat -na | grep "[:.]$test_port " >/dev/null 2>&1 || { PORT=$test_port; break; } test_port=`expr $test_port + 1` done if [ -z "$PORT" ]; then echo "...

...code in test-exec.sh: if [ ! -z "$TEST_SSH_PORT" ]; then PORT="$TEST_SSH_PORT" else PORT=4242 fi could be something similar to: if [ ! -z "$TEST_SSH_PORT" ]; then PORT="$TEST_SSH_PORT" else first_port=4200 last_port=4300 test_port=$first_port while [ "$test_port" -le "$last_port" ]; do netstat -na | grep "[:.]$test_port " >/dev/null 2>&1 || { PORT=$test_port; break; } test_port=`expr $test_port + 1` done if [ -z "$PORT" ]; then echo "Unable...

In data marted? 18 settembre 2018 14:07:26 CEST, Aki Tuomi ha scritto: > If you are using systemd, create > /etc/systemd/system/dovecot.service.d/limits.conf and put > [Service]LimitCORE=infinity > > and run > systemctl daemon-reloadsystemctl restart dovecot Nope, I'm on a debian 7, without systemd. Anyway, I've resolved the issue: I had to set fs.suid_dumpable BEFORE

...FUNCTION__ = "io_loop_run" #12 0xb75da45e in master_service_run (service=0x82bd578, callback=callback at entry=0x804d360 <client_connected>) at master-service.c:719 No locals. #13 0x0804cf5e in main (argc=1, argv=0x82bd300) at main.c:366 set_roots = {0x805f6c0, 0x0} test_port = 0 error = <optimized out> debug = false c = <optimized out> (gdb) fr 8 #8 0xb76613db in io_loop_call_io (io=0x82fb780) at ioloop.c:600 600 io->callback(io->context); (gdb) p *((struct doveadm_connection *)io->context) $1 = {prev = 0x0, nex...

Some more information: the issue has just occurred, again on an instance without the "service_count = 0" configuration directive on pop3-login. I've observed that while the issue is occurring, the director process goes 100% CPU. I've straced the process. It is seemingly looping: ... ... epoll_ctl(13, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, 78, {EPOLLIN|EPOLLPRI|EPOLLERR|EPOLLHUP, {u32=149035320,