Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "test_instal".
Did you mean:
test_install
2014 Jun 24
4
[LLVMdev] Proposal: Improved regression test support for RuntimeDyld/MCJIT.
Hi Dave,
Jim Grosbach asked the same question, so you're in good company. With hindsight I think it was a mistake to say "FileCheck workflow". What I really meant was that this system plays well with lit. Not that your question about using FileCheck would have been any less valid.
I did consider using FileCheck for this, but decided it was the wrong approach. The fundamental reason
2012 Sep 06
2
[LLVMdev] LNT: failing to parse compiler info: what am I doing wrong?
Hi, I'm trying to use LNT to run the test-suite. I followed the
instructions on <http://lnt.llvm.org/quickstart.html>. When I run it I
get this error:
(mysandbox)sean:~/pg/others/llvm % lnt runtest nt --sandbox mysandbox
--cc ~/pg/others/llvm/release/bin/clang --test-suite test-suite
nt.py:1185: note: inferred C++ compiler under test as:
2010 Mar 22
5
UnitTesting-Action view testcase is failed
Hi,
I run the "Unit testing", Then The "Actionview::Testcase" is failed. i.e
i am getting the error as below,
1) Error:
test_tablename(ActionView::TestCase):
TypeError: wrong argument type Class (expected Module)
/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/helpers.rb:76:in
`include''
2012 Sep 06
0
[LLVMdev] LNT: failing to parse compiler info: what am I doing wrong?
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote:
> Hi, I'm trying to use LNT to run the test-suite. I followed the
> instructions on <http://lnt.llvm.org/quickstart.html>. When I run it I
> get this error:
>
> (mysandbox)sean:~/pg/others/llvm % lnt runtest nt --sandbox mysandbox
> --cc ~/pg/others/llvm/release/bin/clang --test-suite
2012 Sep 06
1
[LLVMdev] LNT: failing to parse compiler info: what am I doing wrong?
> And it doesn't match probably because of one of two things (& I forget
> which of the two, if either, have been addressed/workaround):
>
> 1) using cmake instead of configure/make
> 2) using git instead of svn
>
> One or both of these create versions that lnt doesn't understand
> (because they don't include the SVN revision number in the clang
> version
2014 Jun 23
3
[LLVMdev] Proposal: Improved regression test support for RuntimeDyld/MCJIT.
Hi Everyone,
For your consideration: A proposal to improve regression test support for
RuntimeDyld.
Short version: We can make RuntimeDyld far more testable by adding a
trivial pointer-expression language that allows us to describe how memory
should look post-relocation. Jump down to "The Proposal" for details.
Long version:
Background:
For those unfamiliar with it, RuntimeDyld a