search for: test_instal

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "test_instal".

Did you mean: test_install
2014 Jun 24
4
[LLVMdev] Proposal: Improved regression test support for RuntimeDyld/MCJIT.
Hi Dave, Jim Grosbach asked the same question, so you're in good company. With hindsight I think it was a mistake to say "FileCheck workflow". What I really meant was that this system plays well with lit. Not that your question about using FileCheck would have been any less valid. I did consider using FileCheck for this, but decided it was the wrong approach. The fundamental reason
2012 Sep 06
2
[LLVMdev] LNT: failing to parse compiler info: what am I doing wrong?
Hi, I'm trying to use LNT to run the test-suite. I followed the instructions on <http://lnt.llvm.org/quickstart.html>. When I run it I get this error: (mysandbox)sean:~/pg/others/llvm % lnt runtest nt --sandbox mysandbox --cc ~/pg/others/llvm/release/bin/clang --test-suite test-suite nt.py:1185: note: inferred C++ compiler under test as:
2010 Mar 22
5
UnitTesting-Action view testcase is failed
Hi, I run the "Unit testing", Then The "Actionview::Testcase" is failed. i.e i am getting the error as below, 1) Error: test_tablename(ActionView::TestCase): TypeError: wrong argument type Class (expected Module) /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/helpers.rb:76:in `include''
2012 Sep 06
0
[LLVMdev] LNT: failing to parse compiler info: what am I doing wrong?
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > Hi, I'm trying to use LNT to run the test-suite. I followed the > instructions on <http://lnt.llvm.org/quickstart.html>. When I run it I > get this error: > > (mysandbox)sean:~/pg/others/llvm % lnt runtest nt --sandbox mysandbox > --cc ~/pg/others/llvm/release/bin/clang --test-suite
2012 Sep 06
1
[LLVMdev] LNT: failing to parse compiler info: what am I doing wrong?
> And it doesn't match probably because of one of two things (& I forget > which of the two, if either, have been addressed/workaround): > > 1) using cmake instead of configure/make > 2) using git instead of svn > > One or both of these create versions that lnt doesn't understand > (because they don't include the SVN revision number in the clang > version
2014 Jun 23
3
[LLVMdev] Proposal: Improved regression test support for RuntimeDyld/MCJIT.
Hi Everyone, For your consideration: A proposal to improve regression test support for RuntimeDyld. Short version: We can make RuntimeDyld far more testable by adding a trivial pointer-expression language that allows us to describe how memory should look post-relocation. Jump down to "The Proposal" for details. Long version: Background: For those unfamiliar with it, RuntimeDyld a