search for: test_inst

...though. I like the idea of adding some special syntax to disassemble an instruction at a label and use one of its immediates. That would eliminate a lot of the bit bashing that would have been required on instruction sets with tricky immediate encodings (E.g. ARM). Something like: # rtdyld-check: @test_inst[0] = foo - (test_inst + 5) test_inst: callq foo Cheers, Lang. > On Jun 23, 2014, at 5:01 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Everyone, >> >> For your cons...

...#39;LNT==0.4.1dev', 'console_scripts', 'lnt')() File "/home/sean/pg/others/llvm/lnt/lnt/lnttool/main.py", line 281, in main commands[cmd](cmd, args[1:]) File "/home/sean/pg/others/llvm/lnt/lnt/lnttool/main.py", line 149, in action_runtest report = test_instance.run_test('%s %s' % (name, test_name), args) File "/home/sean/pg/others/llvm/lnt/lnt/tests/nt.py", line 1288, in run_test report = run_test(nick, opts, None, report_dir) File "/home/sean/pg/others/llvm/lnt/lnt/tests/nt.py", line 645, in run_test target_fla...

Hi, I run the "Unit testing", Then The "Actionview::Testcase" is failed. i.e i am getting the error as below, 1) Error: test_tablename(ActionView::TestCase): TypeError: wrong argument type Class (expected Module) /usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/helpers.rb:76:in `include''

...#39;console_scripts', 'lnt')() > File "/home/sean/pg/others/llvm/lnt/lnt/lnttool/main.py", line 281, in main > commands[cmd](cmd, args[1:]) > File "/home/sean/pg/others/llvm/lnt/lnt/lnttool/main.py", line 149, > in action_runtest > report = test_instance.run_test('%s %s' % (name, test_name), args) > File "/home/sean/pg/others/llvm/lnt/lnt/tests/nt.py", line 1288, in run_test > report = run_test(nick, opts, None, report_dir) > File "/home/sean/pg/others/llvm/lnt/lnt/tests/nt.py", line 645, in run_test...

...#39;, 'lnt')() >> File "/home/sean/pg/others/llvm/lnt/lnt/lnttool/main.py", line 281, in main >> commands[cmd](cmd, args[1:]) >> File "/home/sean/pg/others/llvm/lnt/lnt/lnttool/main.py", line 149, >> in action_runtest >> report = test_instance.run_test('%s %s' % (name, test_name), args) >> File "/home/sean/pg/others/llvm/lnt/lnt/tests/nt.py", line 1288, in run_test >> report = run_test(nick, opts, None, report_dir) >> File "/home/sean/pg/others/llvm/lnt/lnt/tests/nt.py", line 645,...

Hi Everyone, For your consideration: A proposal to improve regression test support for RuntimeDyld. Short version: We can make RuntimeDyld far more testable by adding a trivial pointer-expression language that allows us to describe how memory should look post-relocation. Jump down to "The Proposal" for details. Long version: Background: For those unfamiliar with it, RuntimeDyld a