search for: test_functions

Previously I posted a work-in-progress preview of this patch series: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-February/msg00224.html This is the finished version that updates all of the shell-script based tests. It passes 'make check', 'make check-direct' and 'make check-slow'. Rich.

Make sure the pod checker script can deal with the newer additions of podwrapper.pl. Followup of commit 46e59e9535c2fcd1c188464b5249a249f22af1a0. --- podcheck.pl | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+) diff --git a/podcheck.pl b/podcheck.pl index 527a2e47d..795fe0e9b 100755 --- a/podcheck.pl +++ b/podcheck.pl @@ -83,6 +83,15 @@ used where the POD includes

...fy/test-virt-sparsify-docs.sh | 1 + sysprep/test-virt-sysprep-docs.sh | 1 + 10 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/cat/test-docs.sh b/cat/test-docs.sh index 30cc1eeb4..0d6d5461a 100755 --- a/cat/test-docs.sh +++ b/cat/test-docs.sh @@ -21,9 +21,14 @@ set -e $TEST_FUNCTIONS skip_if_skipped -$top_srcdir/podcheck.pl virt-cat.pod virt-cat -$top_srcdir/podcheck.pl virt-filesystems.pod virt-filesystems -$top_srcdir/podcheck.pl virt-log.pod virt-log +$top_srcdir/podcheck.pl virt-cat.pod virt-cat \ + --path $top_srcdir/common/options +$top_srcdir/po...

Fix one dist issue, and various builddir!=srcdir issues, also with the patch proposed in the Debian bug #946594. Patch #3 applies also to the virt-v2v repository, and will be committed there too (with references to the libguestfs commit). Pino Toscano (3): inspector: ship the actual test script tests: fix srcdir references build: fix make implicit dependencies on ml/mli files

There's a lot of common code in the tests, eg: if [ "$(guestfish get-backend)" = "uml" ]; then echo "$0: test skipped because UML backend does not support network" exit 77 fi These commits (work in progress) create a common set of test functions for skipping tests etc. Rich.

I''m working in a development environment of Mac OS X with MySQL, and a production deployment environment of Redhat with Oracle XE. In the course of setting up a new continuous build server that more closely mimics our production environment, I got stuck on the following strangeness on the build server (Linux, Oracle). 1. rake fails 2. rake test_units works 3. rake test_functional

...libc-2.29/lib/libc.so.6 No symbol table info available. #2 0x000144fe in test_backtrace_get () at test-backtrace.c:45 bt = 0x0 bt = <optimized out> #3 test_backtrace () at test-backtrace.c:56 No locals. #4 0x000353a4 in test_run_named_funcs (tests=tests at entry=0x6608c <test_functions>, match=match at entry=0x6ddcc "") at test-common.c:288 _data_stack_cur_id = 2 i = <optimized out> #5 0x00035bf0 in test_run_named_with_fatals (match=0x6ddcc "", tests=0x6608c <test_functions>, fatals=0x6603c <fatal_functions>) at test-commo...

Operating system - 64 bit CentOS 7 gcc-4.8.5-4.el7.x86_64 Building against LibreSSL which has been fine for other releases, but it is a crypto test that is fails. Tried with LibreSSL 2.4.2 and 2.3.6 - both the build completes but fails the make check Dovecot 2.2.24 passes make check on both. This is where it fails: Making check in lib-dcrypt make[2]: Entering directory

..., 7} os = 0x0 is = 0x0 ichan1 = 0xd31e8 ochan1 = 0xd3470 io = 0xd34c8 ichan0 = 0x1b10e8 ochan0 = 0x1b1290 #4 test_multiplex () at test-multiplex.c:164 No locals. #5 0x0003e3d4 in test_run_named_funcs (tests=tests at entry=0x80444 <test_functions>, match=match at entry=0x7fd38 "") at test-common.c:255 _data_stack_cur_id = 2 i = <optimized out> #6 0x0003f1d8 in test_run_named_with_fatals (match=0x7fd38 "", tests=0x80444 <test_functions>, fatals=0x7fde0 <fatal_functions>) at test-c...

...t;, ct = 0x55555557de38 "5086cb9b507219ee95db113a917678b2"}} key = 0x55555578e0f0 iv = 0x55555578e158 pt = 0x55555578e1c0 ct = 0x55555578e228 res_enc = 0x55555578e290 res_dec = 0x55555578e308 #2 0x00005555555656f1 in test_run_funcs (test_functions=test_functions at entry=0x55555578b020 <test_functions.5619>) at test-common.c:354 _data_stack_cur_id = 2 i = 0 #3 0x0000555555565fc1 in test_run (test_functions=0x55555578b020 <test_functions.5619>) at test-common.c:404 No locals. #4 0x000055555555f462 in main ()...

...f it is not installed. --- v2v/test-v2v-o-rhv-upload.sh | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/v2v/test-v2v-o-rhv-upload.sh b/v2v/test-v2v-o-rhv-upload.sh index 8bda7cc0b..29214a9db 100755 --- a/v2v/test-v2v-o-rhv-upload.sh +++ b/v2v/test-v2v-o-rhv-upload.sh @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ set -x $TEST_FUNCTIONS skip_if_skipped skip_if_backend uml +skip_unless nbdkit file --version skip_unless_phony_guest windows.img libvirt_uri="test://$abs_top_builddir/test-data/phony-guests/guests.xml" -- 2.17.1

I''m new to ROR, and am working my way through the Agile Web Development Book. In the test application, the authors tell me to test my database connection by performing "rake db:migrate". When I do, I get the error "Don''t know how to build task ''db:migrate''" I''ve been looking around at the files, and I see a reference to a

I've been attemping to create a test dll that contains R objects (actually I simply copied the code from the "Writing R extensions") and got it to build the dll using rcmd shlib main.c (okay, it's simple, but effective). Here's the info so far: this is the contents of the main.c file (not there's no WinMain()). Do we put it in or does the script do it when we compile?

...8-October/msg00008.html v2v/test-v2v-o-rhv-upload.sh | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/v2v/test-v2v-o-rhv-upload.sh b/v2v/test-v2v-o-rhv-upload.sh index 8bda7cc0b..23d2ad7a0 100755 --- a/v2v/test-v2v-o-rhv-upload.sh +++ b/v2v/test-v2v-o-rhv-upload.sh @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ set -x $TEST_FUNCTIONS skip_if_skipped skip_if_backend uml +skip_unless python3 --version +skip_unless nbdkit python3 --version skip_unless_phony_guest windows.img libvirt_uri="test://$abs_top_builddir/test-data/phony-guests/guests.xml" -- 2.17.1

Hi, First, thanks for the plugin. Sorry if this is not strictly a backgroundrb issue but I thought others on this list might have come across this problem. I''m trying to run the test that comes via the worker generator. The test works fine when running ''rake test_functional'', but when the tests are run by autotest I get "uninitialized constant BackgrounDRb"

On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 19:47 -0500, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Paul wrote: > > I'm trying to pass an array pointer to my run-time generated module, and > > after a long time of searching for the answer, the only thing I got was > > a headache. Basically I have a few arrays (few megabytes which will > > sometimes be accessed as 8 / 16 / 32 / 64 bit

...t now. --- tests/test-v2v-o-rhv-upload.sh | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tests/test-v2v-o-rhv-upload.sh b/tests/test-v2v-o-rhv-upload.sh index a2f5b0d5..fe0a4d94 100755 --- a/tests/test-v2v-o-rhv-upload.sh +++ b/tests/test-v2v-o-rhv-upload.sh @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ $TEST_FUNCTIONS skip_if_skipped skip_if_backend uml skip_unless python3 --version -skip_unless nbdkit python3 --version +skip_unless nbdkit python --version skip_unless_phony_guest windows.img libvirt_uri="test://$abs_top_builddir/test-data/phony-guests/guests.xml" -- 2.21.0

...--- mltools/test-tools-messages.sh | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mltools/test-tools-messages.sh b/mltools/test-tools-messages.sh index 0e24d6c..73e1beb 100755 --- a/mltools/test-tools-messages.sh +++ b/mltools/test-tools-messages.sh @@ -25,4 +25,4 @@ set -x $TEST_FUNCTIONS skip_if_skipped -$PYTHON parse_tools_messages_test.py +$PYTHON "$srcdir/parse_tools_messages_test.py" -- 2.23.0

Hi all, In Rails 1.0, why would running rake test_functional be different from running ruby test/functional/my_tests.rb? I''ve got a set of tests that pass fine when run individually, but fail when they''re run from rake. Anyone else seen this? I don''t know if it''s relevant, but I''m doing ERb template rendering in a $SAFE binding... Seems mighty

I''ve created a model, let''s just call it Person class Person attr_accessor :first_name, :lastname def full_name @first_name + " " + @last_name end end I''m using this in my Rails application. My Rails application does not use a database of any kind, and this model is obviously not a subclass of ActiveRecord::Base. I can''t unit test this