search for: test_functional

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 160 matches for "test_functional".

Did you mean: test_function
2017 Feb 20
3
[PATCH 0/3] tests: Define common test functions.
Previously I posted a work-in-progress preview of this patch series: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-February/msg00224.html This is the finished version that updates all of the shell-script based tests. It passes 'make check', 'make check-direct' and 'make check-slow'. Rich.
2019 Dec 11
2
[PATCH 1/2] podcheck: __INCLUDE:file.pod__ and __VERBATIM:file.txt__ in POD files.
Make sure the pod checker script can deal with the newer additions of podwrapper.pl. Followup of commit 46e59e9535c2fcd1c188464b5249a249f22af1a0. --- podcheck.pl | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+) diff --git a/podcheck.pl b/podcheck.pl index 527a2e47d..795fe0e9b 100755 --- a/podcheck.pl +++ b/podcheck.pl @@ -83,6 +83,15 @@ used where the POD includes
2019 Dec 11
0
[PATCH 2/2] tests: fix podcheck tests
Pass to the various podcheck invocations the paths with POD files that are included. Followup of commit 46e59e9535c2fcd1c188464b5249a249f22af1a0. --- cat/test-docs.sh | 13 +++++++++---- customize/test-virt-customize-docs.sh | 1 + diff/test-virt-diff-docs.sh | 1 + edit/test-virt-edit-docs.sh | 3 ++- fish/test-docs.sh |
2019 Dec 17
5
[PATCH 0/3] Various dist/build fixes
Fix one dist issue, and various builddir!=srcdir issues, also with the patch proposed in the Debian bug #946594. Patch #3 applies also to the virt-v2v repository, and will be committed there too (with references to the libguestfs commit). Pino Toscano (3): inspector: ship the actual test script tests: fix srcdir references build: fix make implicit dependencies on ml/mli files
2017 Feb 19
3
[PATCH [WIP] 0/3] tests: Define common test functions.
There's a lot of common code in the tests, eg: if [ "$(guestfish get-backend)" = "uml" ]; then echo "$0: test skipped because UML backend does not support network" exit 77 fi These commits (work in progress) create a common set of test functions for skipping tests etc. Rich.
2006 Mar 10
2
rake fails on build server, but not in development
...uction deployment environment of Redhat with Oracle XE. In the course of setting up a new continuous build server that more closely mimics our production environment, I got stuck on the following strangeness on the build server (Linux, Oracle). 1. rake fails 2. rake test_units works 3. rake test_functional works We''ve reduced the problem down to a simple fault by using --trace ... I can see that "purge_test_database" does not happen between test_units and test_functional when a complete rake is done, and the database has a bunch of stuff in it from the unit tests, so it is not...
2020 Feb 21
1
Test failure on ARM: backtrace_append
Le Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:25:15 +0200 (EET), Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> a ?crit : > Thank you, > > as I don't have arm at hand, can you provide > > gdb .test-lib core > bt full > > output? > --- > Aki Tuomi > There you are (sorry for the long file names, that's how guix works, it's expected): [New LWP 21501] Core was generated
2016 Aug 04
2
Dovecot 2.2.25 test failure
Operating system - 64 bit CentOS 7 gcc-4.8.5-4.el7.x86_64 Building against LibreSSL which has been fine for other releases, but it is a crypto test that is fails. Tried with LibreSSL 2.4.2 and 2.3.6 - both the build completes but fails the make check Dovecot 2.2.24 passes make check on both. This is where it fails: Making check in lib-dcrypt make[2]: Entering directory
2018 Feb 06
1
Segmentation fault in "make check" test_istream_multiplex for 2.3.0 on Solaris Sparc
Hi there, I get a crash when doing "make check" for version 2.3.0 on Solaris Sparc. The build was done with gcc 7.3.0. The crash happens in ioloop-poll.c line 181 when running test_istream_multiplex.c: #0 io_loop_handler_run_internal (ioloop=ioloop at entry=0x130dd0) at ioloop-poll.c:181 181 if (pollfd->revents != 0) { Due to the code 180
2016 Aug 04
2
Dovecot 2.2.25 test failure
On 08/04/2016 06:13 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote: > > > On 04.08.2016 16:11, Michael A. Peters wrote: >> Operating system - 64 bit CentOS 7 >> gcc-4.8.5-4.el7.x86_64 >> >> Building against LibreSSL which has been fine for other releases, but >> it is a crypto test that is fails. >> >> Tried with LibreSSL 2.4.2 and 2.3.6 - both the build completes but
2018 Oct 01
2
[PATCH] v2v: -o rhv-upload: skip test-v2v-o-rhv-upload.sh w/o nbdkit
-o rhv-upload requires nbdkit, so skip this test if it is not installed. --- v2v/test-v2v-o-rhv-upload.sh | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/v2v/test-v2v-o-rhv-upload.sh b/v2v/test-v2v-o-rhv-upload.sh index 8bda7cc0b..29214a9db 100755 --- a/v2v/test-v2v-o-rhv-upload.sh +++ b/v2v/test-v2v-o-rhv-upload.sh @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ set -x $TEST_FUNCTIONS skip_if_skipped skip_if_backend
2006 Aug 05
5
error with db:migrate
I''m new to ROR, and am working my way through the Agile Web Development Book. In the test application, the authors tell me to test my database connection by performing "rake db:migrate". When I do, I get the error "Don''t know how to build task ''db:migrate''" I''ve been looking around at the files, and I see a reference to a
2003 May 20
1
building a Win32 DLL with R objects?
I've been attemping to create a test dll that contains R objects (actually I simply copied the code from the "Writing R extensions") and got it to build the dll using rcmd shlib main.c (okay, it's simple, but effective). Here's the info so far: this is the contents of the main.c file (not there's no WinMain()). Do we put it in or does the script do it when we compile?
2018 Oct 01
2
[PATCH v2] v2v: -o rhv-upload: test-v2v-o-rhv-upload.sh: add more skip checks
-o rhv-upload requires python3, and nbdkit with the python3 plugin, so skip this test if they are not installed. --- v1 is: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-October/msg00008.html v2v/test-v2v-o-rhv-upload.sh | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/v2v/test-v2v-o-rhv-upload.sh b/v2v/test-v2v-o-rhv-upload.sh index 8bda7cc0b..23d2ad7a0 100755 ---
2006 Jul 18
7
backgroundrb and autotest
Hi, First, thanks for the plugin. Sorry if this is not strictly a backgroundrb issue but I thought others on this list might have come across this problem. I''m trying to run the test that comes via the worker generator. The test works fine when running ''rake test_functional'', but when the tests are run by autotest I get "uninitialized constant BackgrounDRb" (full stack trace below). I notice that BackgrounDRb::Rails is defined in "script/lib", is this a non-standard location that autotest somehow bypasses? I''m totally clueless as...
2005 Apr 11
2
[LLVMdev] JIT and array pointers
On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 19:47 -0500, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Paul wrote: > > I'm trying to pass an array pointer to my run-time generated module, and > > after a long time of searching for the answer, the only thing I got was > > a headache. Basically I have a few arrays (few megabytes which will > > sometimes be accessed as 8 / 16 / 32 / 64 bit
2019 Nov 29
2
[PATCH] tests: rhv-upload: Require nbdkit python plugin
With recent nbdkit the skip test fails the rhv-upload test skip: $ nbdkit python3 --version nbdkit: error: cannot open plugin 'python3': /usr/local/lib/nbdkit/plugins/nbdkit-python3-plugin.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory It seems that the python plugin is always installed as nbdkit-python-plugin.so, so the correct test now is: nbdkit
2019 Dec 17
1
[common PATCH] tests: fix srcdir references
Make sure to properly reference to files in the source directory. --- mltools/test-tools-messages.sh | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mltools/test-tools-messages.sh b/mltools/test-tools-messages.sh index 0e24d6c..73e1beb 100755 --- a/mltools/test-tools-messages.sh +++ b/mltools/test-tools-messages.sh @@ -25,4 +25,4 @@ set -x $TEST_FUNCTIONS skip_if_skipped
2006 Apr 07
1
Testing problem
Hi all, In Rails 1.0, why would running rake test_functional be different from running ruby test/functional/my_tests.rb? I''ve got a set of tests that pass fine when run individually, but fail when they''re run from rake. Anyone else seen this? I don''t know if it''s relevant, but I''m doing ERb template renderin...
2005 Dec 30
1
Need serious help - unit testing without a database
I''ve created a model, let''s just call it Person class Person attr_accessor :first_name, :lastname def full_name @first_name + " " + @last_name end end I''m using this in my Rails application. My Rails application does not use a database of any kind, and this model is obviously not a subclass of ActiveRecord::Base. I can''t unit test this