search for: test_funcs

Hello, I apologise in advance for this question; I'm sure it is answered in the documentation or this mailing list many times, however the answer has eluded me. I'm trying to write a function where I don't want external variables to be scoped in from the parent environment. Given this function: test_func = function() { if (exists("kat") == FALSE) {

Hi, I have a IR file generated by Clang: ; ModuleID = 'test_load_lib.c' target datalayout = "e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:64:64-f32:32:32-f64:64:64-f80:128:128-v64:64:64-v128:128:128-a0:0:64-f80:32:32-n8:16:32-S32" target triple = "i686-pc-mingw32" declare i32 @a_outside_func(i32) define i32 @test_func() { entry: %call = call i32

On Mar 15, 2010, at 9:41 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Mar 15, 2010, at 7:11 AM, Sebastian Schlunke wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> i ran into a problem when using blockaddress() with a label in another function. It seems to me that LLVM tries to remove the label used in blockaddress because it seems like it is not used, but in fact it may be used somewhere with a

Hello I quite thank you for your advice,but I have to tell that it made no difference too calling "LLVMAddGlobalMapping(ee,LLVMGetNamedFunction(m,"_a_outside_func"),(void*)(&a_outside_func));". 2014-04-04 16:10 GMT+08:00 Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info>: > Hello > > While there is a symbol in the object file, there is nothing like this >

On Mar 15, 2010, at 10:07 AM, Bob Wilson wrote: >>> An earlier revision simply generated asm-code, where the appropriate label was missing, thus causing gcc to fail when i wanted to compile the asm-file. >> >> Here is a slightly reduced testcase: >> >> define i8* @test1() nounwind { >> entry: >> ret i8* blockaddress(@test_fun, %test_label) >> }

oh,I'm sorry to make such a stupid mistake...But I still have to tell the correct one still didnt make difference...so weird 2014-04-04 16:30 GMT+08:00 Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info>: > Are you sure, that LLVMGetNamedFunction(m,"_a_outside_func") does not > return NULL? I believe it should be > LLVMGetNamedFunction(m,"a_outside_func") >

I see. But the block does not necessarily contain dead code. My original problem is more like this: define i32 @main() { entry: %target = bitcast i8* blockaddress(@test_fun, %test_label) to i8* call i32 @test_fun(i8* %target) ret i32 0 } define i32 @test_fun(i8* %target) { entry: indirectbr i8* %target, [label %test_label] test_label: ; assume some code here... br label %ret ret: ret

On Mar 15, 2010, at 7:11 AM, Sebastian Schlunke wrote: > Hi, > > i ran into a problem when using blockaddress() with a label in another function. It seems to me that LLVM tries to remove the label used in blockaddress because it seems like it is not used, but in fact it may be used somewhere with a indirectbr. > > I attached a small test-case that produces this error. (The

Hi, i ran into a problem when using blockaddress() with a label in another function. It seems to me that LLVM tries to remove the label used in blockaddress because it seems like it is not used, but in fact it may be used somewhere with a indirectbr. I attached a small test-case that produces this error. (The original problem is much more complicated, so i hope the reduced example, which has no

On Mar 15, 2010, at 10:01 AM, Sebastian Schlunke wrote: > I see. But the block does not necessarily contain dead code. This case is now fixed in r98566, I will fix the 'dead block' case in a bit. -Chris > > My original problem is more like this: > > define i32 @main() { > entry: > %target = bitcast i8* blockaddress(@test_fun, %test_label) to i8* > > call

Works like a charm! Thanks for the fast help. :) - Sebastian On Monday 15 March 2010 20:10:54 you wrote: > > On Mar 15, 2010, at 10:01 AM, Sebastian Schlunke wrote: > > > I see. But the block does not necessarily contain dead code. > > This case is now fixed in r98566, I will fix the 'dead block' case in a bit. > > -Chris > > > > > My

Send again since llvmdev is moved to llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org On 2015/8/5 9:58, Wangnan (F) wrote: > > > On 2015/8/4 17:01, Wangnan (F) wrote: >> For people who in llvmdev: >> >> This mail is belong to a thread in linux kernel mailing list, the >> first message >> can be retrived from: >> >> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/55B1535E.8090406 at

Hi, When REnouveau came to "74/75 test_interesting_registers" the CPU used 100% and I could only use the mouse, but not interact witt anything. What could be wrong? I am using GeForce 6150 and Fedora 7. Love, Louise

hi i have gone through the achieves but still could not get my bridge to suvive a reboot . please can anyone help me am using fedora core 2 -----Original message----- From: bridge-request@lists.osdl.org Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 03:08:06 +0100 To: bridge@lists.osdl.org Subject: Bridge Digest, Vol 17, Issue 25 > Send Bridge mailing list submissions to > bridge@lists.osdl.org > >

Hi, Gaël, Thanks for your detailed reply. I tried the pattern matching first, however, the intrinsic function is matching with a normal function call. For example, I have the following IR, which contains intrinsic function "foo": ***************************************************************************************** *define i32 @test_func() {* *EntryBlock:* * %0 = call i32

On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 17:05:59 +0000 David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> wrote: > On Sat, 2004-12-18 at 08:50 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > It's not really an oops, just a warning that stack space got quiet > > tight. > > > > The problem seems to be that the br netfilter code is nesting far too > > deeply and recursing several times. Looks like a design

Hello, I Have a question related to the RT check on pointers during Loop Access Analysis pass. There is a testcase with loop code that consist of 4 different memory operations referring two global objects of different address spaces. One from global constant (address space 4, addr_size = 64) and the other from local, LDS (address space 3, addr_size= 32). (Details of various address spaces

Hi, All, I want to add one intrinsic function for my particular backend. Let's say the intrinsic function is named "foo" which takes two i32 inputs and has one i32 output. First, I add this line "def int_foo : Intrinsic<[llvm_i32_ty], [llvm_i32_ty, llvm_i32_ty], [IntrReadArgMem]>;" in /include/llvm/IR/Intrinsics.td. Then, in my target/InstrInfo.td, I'm supposed

Hi Stefanos, Attached the testcase. I tried to reduce it further, but the problem goes away when I remove the instructions further. There is a nested loop and the fault occurs while processing the inner loop (for.body) To reproduce the crash: opt -O3 testcase.ll -o out.ll > `groupChecks()` will only try to group pointers that are on the same alias set. If that’s true, the RT check

I’ve been spending a great deal of time chasing this problem. Hopefully someone sees something obvious I’m doing wrong. Basically anytime I try to call fields_for from an RJS file or within a partial in the RJS file, I get the following error. My goal is simply to load a partial into a div. The fields in this partial require fields_for though. And that’s where the problem lies.