search for: test_div

...like fade in and out an element on hovering an element(-> tooltip behavior), but when i''m using Effect.Appear/Effect.Fade both effects will continue to play and overlap each other, resulting in unpredictable behavior. <code> <button onmouseover="Effect.Appear(''test_div2'')" onmouseout="Effect.Fade(''test_div'')">TRIGGER</button> <div id="test_div" style="width: 100px; height: 100px; background-color: #FF33CC;">TEST</div> </code> So i need some advice how to stop a running ef...

...ot sure if this is more Rails or RSpec related... I''ve got an app with an RJS view that updates a div in a page with the contents of a partial. The partial contains a non-ascii character namely a pound sign. I set up a simple test app with this RJS view: page.replace_html("test_div", :partial => "test_action") and this _test_action.rhtml: <p>?500</p> Now this spec fails: require File.dirname(__FILE__) + ''/../../spec_helper'' context "Given a request to render view_test/test_action" do setup do...

...iew (dashboard.html.erb ) like <table width="100%" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tr> <td> <%= link_to_remote ''Refresh'', {:url => request_summary_graph_path}, :update => "test_div_this" %> </td> </tr> <tr> <td > <div id="test_div"> <%= @graph %> </div> </td> </tr> </table> What i am trying to do when clicking on Refresh link the portion inside div "test_div...

...render :text => "login", :layout => false, :status => 500 else redirect_to :action => ''index'' end end end in my app/views/test/test.rhtml... <%= link_to_remote "test_good", :update => "test_div", :url => { :controller => ''test'' :action => ''test'', :id => 1}, :loading => "alert(''loading'')", :success => "alert(''success'')", :failure => "alert(''failed'...

...superset or subset of the optimizations that GCC does in terms of alias analysis, and we can quite reasonably describe us a GCC compatible in terms of us providing this capability. A user insisting we have a bug in this tbaa situation is analogous to your "pony" request about "float test_div(float a, float b) { return a/b; }". And (unrelated to Clang/LLVM) I've had this sort of objection from users in tbaa situations in the past, where I've had to defend my point that just because GCC didn't optimize it as aggressively as the compiler I was providing, it wasn't a...

...superset or subset of the optimizations that GCC does in terms of alias analysis, and we can quite reasonably describe us a GCC compatible in terms of us providing this capability. A user insisting we have a bug in this tbaa situation is analogous to your "pony" request about "float test_div(float a, float b) { return a/b; }". And (unrelated to Clang/LLVM) I've had this sort of objection from users in tbaa situations in the past, where I've had to defend my point that just because GCC didn't optimize it as aggressively as the compiler I was providing, it wasn't a...

> On Nov 16, 2016, at 10:04 PM, Ristow, Warren <warren.ristow at sony.com> wrote: > > > Can you elaborate what kind of runtime failure is the reciprocal transformation triggering? > > Yes. It was along the lines of: > > { > float x = a / c; > float y = b / c; > > if (y == 1.0f) { > // do some processing for when

>All that said, I think we (the company I work for, Sony) will have to implement support >for these switches. It comes down to GCC has these switches (e.g., -fno-reciprocal-math >and -fno-associative-math), and they do suppress the transformations for our customers. >They switch to Clang/LLVM, they use the same switches, and it doesn't "work". So as a >practical