search for: test_class

...lity of the R.oo, I found that during the first construction of a object from a class, the constructor is twice called, but only one object is finalized. In all subsequent creation processes, the constructor is (expectedly) called once. Here some example code: library(R.oo) setConstructorS3("Test_class",function(val) { cat("constructor\n") if(missing(val)) val<-NA; extend(Object(), "Test_class", .val=val) }) setMethodS3("finalize","Test_class",function(this,...) { cat("destructor\n") }) o<-Test_class(1) rm(o) gc() Is there...

Hello, I try config puppet with foreman frontend. Into puppetmasterd I create modules "test" and create init.pp: # Create "/tmp/testfile" if it doesn''t exist. class test_class { file { "/tmp/testfile": ensure => present, mode => 644, owner => root, group => root } } Configure nodes in site.pp and import module: import "test" node "srv2-svc8.net.billing.ru" { include test_class } Run p...

...l rundir=/var/run/puppet factpath=$vardir/lib/facter pluginsync=false server=puppetmaster.domain.com [puppetmasterd] templatedir=/var/lib/puppet/templates certname=puppetmaster.domain.com Puppet Server''s site.pp file: # Create "/tmp/testfile" if it doesn''t exist. class test_class { file { "/tmp/testfile": ensure => present, mode => 644, owner => root, group => root } } # tell puppet on which client to run the class node pclient { include test_class } Client''s puppet.conf file: [main] # Where...

I''m just now getting to testing some things out with puppet and here is my first stab at it. This is in the site.pp file of the puppet server. class test_class { cron { testentry: command => "/usr/sbin/myscript.sh", user => root, hour => 2, minute => 0 } } node leestestbox { include test_class } I''m doing this all by hand, so I then run this on the puppet client box: puppe...

....col) }) dataset <- dataset[!same] This works GREAT (thanks to the r-users list archive I found this) however, then when I do my data sampling like so: testSize <- floor(nrow(x) * 10/100) test <- sample(1:nrow(x), testSize) train_data <- x[-test,] test_data <- x[test, -1] test_class <- x[test, 1] It is now possible that test_data or train_data contain columns that are constants, however as one dataset they did not. So the solution for me is to just re-run lines to remove all constants......not a problem, but is this normal? is this how I should be handling this in R? ma...

...> really use the "only truly correct" ;-) > > inherits(x, "...") > or > is(x, "....") # if you're advanced/brave enough (:-) to > # use formal classes (S4) Thanks for the helpful blog post Martin. Is the following ?test_class? %in% class(some_object) which I think in your symbols would be ??? %in% class(x) safe as far as you see it? By safe, I mean equivalent to your suggestion of inherits(x, ???) . Thanks, Bryan

I''ve been developing a series of custom assertions for testing my models and it looks like I can unify most some of the assertions if I can find a good way to determine the class under test at run-time. Now I refactor my test code rather vigorously so its not as simple as just stripping "Test" off the name of the test case class, but I have a few thoughts on a useful convention

...uppet/ templates'' info: Starting server for Puppet version 0.22.4 info: mount[files]: denying * access uninitialized constant Puppet::Network::Handler::FileServer::AuthStoreError where # /etc/puppet/manifests/site.pp # Create "/tmp/testfile" if it doesn''t exist. class test_class { file { "/tmp/testfile": ensure => present, mode => 644, owner => root, group => root } } # tell puppet on which client to run the class node fedfan.cs { include test_class } --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Yo...

...-11-21 19:59:03 UTC (rev 744) </span><span class="lines">@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@ </span><ins>+require ''test/unit'' +require ''test/unit/ui/console/testrunner'' +require ''wx'' + +class TestApp < Wx::App + attr_accessor :test_class + def on_init + Test::Unit::UI::Console::TestRunner.run(self.test_class) + end +end + +class CtrlContainerFrame < Wx::Frame + attr_accessor :control + def initialize(ctrl_class, *args) + super(nil, -1, ''Test '' + ctrl_class.name) + self.control = ctrl_class.new(self...

...gt; inherits(x, "...") >>> or >>> is(x, "....") # if you're advanced/brave enough (:-) to >>> # use formal classes (S4) >> >> Thanks for the helpful blog post Martin. Is the following >> >> ?test_class? %in% class(some_object) >> >> which I think in your symbols would be >> >> ??? %in% class(x) >> >> safe as far as you see it? By safe, I mean equivalent to your suggestion of inherits(x, ???) . > Those aren't equivalent if...

...t" ;-) >> >> inherits(x, "...") >> or >> is(x, "....") # if you're advanced/brave enough (:-) to >> # use formal classes (S4) > > Thanks for the helpful blog post Martin. Is the following > > ?test_class? %in% class(some_object) > > which I think in your symbols would be > > ??? %in% class(x) > > safe as far as you see it? By safe, I mean equivalent to your suggestion of inherits(x, ???) . Those aren't equivalent if S4 gets involved. You can see it if you run this co...

It seems like a very common expectation that the following code would work: class boo { $me = "/something" file { $me: ensure => present } } class yay inherits boo { $me = "/something/else" } Yet, as many have found to their chagrin, it does not work. Should it? I believe I know how I could make this work: Create a single variable namespace for class

...>>> or > >>> is(x, "....") # if you're advanced/brave enough (:-) to > >>> # use formal classes (S4) > >> > >> Thanks for the helpful blog post Martin. Is the following > >> > >> ?test_class? %in% class(some_object) > >> > >> which I think in your symbols would be > >> > >> ??? %in% class(x) > >> > >> safe as far as you see it? By safe, I mean equivalent to your suggestion of inherits(x, ???) . > &...

...6-11-26 09:47:32 UTC (rev 758) </span><span class="lines">@@ -0,0 +1,100 @@ </span><ins>+require ''test/unit'' +require ''test/unit/ui/console/testrunner'' +require ''wx'' +class TestApp < Wx::App + attr_accessor :test_class + def on_init + Test::Unit::UI::Console::TestRunner.run(self.test_class) + end +end + +class TestInternationalisation < Test::Unit::TestCase + def test_encodings + default = Wx::Font.get_default_encoding + assert_kind_of(Integer, default) + assert_kind_of(String, Wx::Font.get_defa...

Thanks Martin and Peter, I agree that we can be careful and narrow and still see a nice improvement in behavior. While Herve's point is valid and I understand his frustration, I think staying within the matrix vs c(matrix, array) space is the right scope for this work in terms of fiddling with inheritance. As another point, I don't know off the top of my head of any other classes which