Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "test_add_8".
Did you mean:
test_add
2013 Jul 11
1
[LLVMdev] Bikeshedding a name for new directive: CHECK-LABEL vs. CHECK-BOUNDARY vs. something else.
...owering &TLI, const SDValue &Op) {
continue;
}
}
- break;
+// break;
case ISD::FADD:
if (ConstantFPSDNode *V0CFP =
dyn_cast<ConstantFPSDNode>(V->getOperand(0))) {
The single error message without CHECK-FOO is:
; CHECK: test_add_8
^
<stdin>:125:2: note: scanning from here
.cfi_endproc
^
<stdin>:127:10: note: possible intended match here
.globl _test_add_10
^
The error messages with CHECK-FOO on the function name label lines are:
; CHECK: vmulsd
^
<stdin>:87:2: note: scanning...