search for: test_0

...to get rid of the keywords limit ? Or perhaps the new dbox storage format can fix that ? By the way, the comportement of Dovecot when we try to add a new flag while the limit is exceeded is strange : (C: is client and S: Dovecot) The store of the flags is ok : C: RUBY0094 UID STORE 89 +FLAGS (test_0 test_1 test_2 test_3 test_4 test_5 test_6 test_7 test_8 test_9 test_10 test_11 test_12 test_13 test_14 test_15 test_16 test_17 test_18 test_19 test_20 test_21 test_22 test_23 test_24 test_25 test_26) S: * 81 FETCH (UID 89 FLAGS (\Seen test_1 test_2 test_3 test_4 test_5 test_6 test_7 test_8...

...t the changes >> in the EH staff and the documentation on the website is not complete... Is there >> any way i can force the generation of these tables in current LLVM? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Yiannis >> Hi Duncan, Sorry for my omission! I attach an example (test_0.ll). I do: llvm-as < test_0.ll | llc and i get output-llvm28.txt with the 2.8 versions of the tools and i repeat with the latest versions from the svn repo and i get output-llvm30.txt. As you can see there is a: .section .gcc_except_table,"a", at progbits .... in the 2...

Hi Yiannis, > I have been using llvm 2.8 (i know ancient history!) for a backend that i was > implementing. I have been trying to port my patches to latest llvm (svn build) > lately but i have one problem as far as the Exception Handling mechanism is > concerned. It seems that there are no Exception Tables generated any more such > as the one below: got some example bitcode for

Hey everybody! I have been using llvm 2.8 (i know ancient history!) for a backend that i was implementing. I have been trying to port my patches to latest llvm (svn build) lately but i have one problem as far as the Exception Handling mechanism is concerned. It seems that there are no Exception Tables generated any more such as the one below: .section .gcc_except_table,"a", at

...taff and the documentation on the website is not complete... Is there >>> any way i can force the generation of these tables in current LLVM? >>> >>> Thanks in advance, >>> Yiannis >>> > Hi Duncan, > > Sorry for my omission! I attach an example (test_0.ll). I do: > llvm-as < test_0.ll | llc > and i get output-llvm28.txt with the 2.8 versions of the tools and i repeat with > the latest versions from the svn repo and i get output-llvm30.txt. > > As you can see there is a: > .section .gcc_except_table,"a", at progbits...

...c, 4 to symbol. and I don't find how to set plain text. In the following code, the font to use for Latin text is correct. I also tested postscript(), and it did as what was expected. Any suggestions? Thanks in advance! Regards, Jinsong ### the code to reproduce my question ### pdf("test_0.pdf", fonts = c("GB1")) plot(1:10) text(5,4, "\u4F60\u597D", family="GB1", font = 0) ## bold text(5,5, "is 'hello' in Chinese", font = 0) ## normal dev.off() pdf("test_1.pdf", fonts = c("GB1")) plot(1:10) text(5,4, "\u4F...