search for: test21

...he call instruction, instead of being a separate instruction in the LLVM IR ? The LLVM IR Builder adds it as a separate instruction, but it is rolled into one call instruction in the .bc output. I am just curious as to why it is done this way. #include <stdint.h> #include <stdio.h> int test21(void); int test21(void) { printf("Hello1\n"); return 0; } define dso_local i32 @test21() #0 { %1 = call i32 (i8*, ...) @printf(i8* getelementptr inbounds ([8 x i8], [8 x i8]* @.str, i64 0, i64 0)) ret i32 0 }

http://dovecot.org/test/ Should work again with maildir. - Some bugfixes to indexes (possibly fixing the still persisting maildir sync errrors?) - Enabled cache file again. If client asks about something that can be cached for future, it's done. There's currently no smart logic about when not to do it or when to cache more than was asked for future use. Currently nothing is ever

...line #include "statictext.h" needs to be added to the top. Like I said, I can make a diff of these tonight. I''m not sure if we want to make it part of 0.2 or wait to 0.3. It''s pretty obvious that validators have never worked from looking at the test code (etc/test21.rb is the only test that uses it, and the Validator code has obviously not been changed over from C++). Nick

...e9-835b-4334-b544-048a5278b5d4.meta - *** The rsync command being issued: /usr/bin/rsync -rptv --partial --partial-dir=.partial --timeout=60 --password-file=/tmp/10.50.2.23_b8f9d7e9-835b-4334-b544-048a5278b5d4. secret rsync://root@localhost:902/b8f9d7e9-835b-4334-b544-048a5278b5d4 /root/rtest/test21 >> /tmp/1228428918_b8f9d7e9-835b-4334-b544-048a5278b5d4.txt Output: receiving file list ... done created directory /root/rtest/test21 ./ y/ y/Family/ y/Family/Temp/ y/z/ y/z/b8f9d7e9-835b-4334-b544-048a5278b5d4/ y/z/b8f9d7e9-835b-4334-b544-048a5278b5d4/b8f9d7e9-835b-4334-b544-04...

...eople had submitted patches or bug reports, and tried to do as many as I could. There are a few more still in my queue. See the changelog for a complete record of what I fixed. The hardest one turned out to be validators. They were completely broken in 0.2, as Nick pointed out. The sample (etc/test21.rb) was itself quite broken, so I had to fix that while also fixing wxRuby itself. There are probably still some bugs, and the way validators work is somewhat frustrating right now, but at least the sample app works, so the situation is much better than it was. Probably my biggest goal for 0.3...

...ta I want to append the following data to create an empty structure for the new data > dput(dNewTests) structure(list(type = structure(1:9, .Label = c("test14", "test15", "test16", "test17", "test18", "test19", "test20", "test21", "test22" ), class = "factor")), .Names = "type", class = "data.frame", row.names = c(NA, -9L)) rbind obviously throws the following error: rbind(d, dNewTests) Error in rbind(deparse.level, ...) : numbers of columns of arguments do not match Any w...

Tracing down some things to add in validators and I''ve run across something that kinda bothers me... In order to implement validators you have to override the clone method. The directors seems to be set up to specifically handle this situation. However, whenever C++ calls back to the object''s methods the swig_get_up function is returning false. It seems like swig_up

On dovecot-1.0-test21: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../src/lib -I../../src/lib-auth -DPKG_RUNDIR=\""/usr/local/var/run/dovecot"\" -DSBINDIR=\""/usr/local/sbin"\" -I/usr/local/include -g -O2 -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wpointer-arith...

...)))])"}, {"_ZN5test01jINS_1AEEEvRAszdtcvT__E6buffer_c", "void test0::j<test0::A>(char (&) [sizeof ((test0::A)().buffer)])"}, {"_ZN5test11fINS_1XEiEEvT_IT0_E", "void test1::f<test1::X, int>(test1::X<int>)"}, {"_ZN5test211read_memberINS_1AEEEDtptcvPT_Li0E6memberERS2_", "decltype((test2::A*)(0)->member) test2::read_member<test2::A>(test2::A&)"}, {"_ZN5test37get_p_1INS_7DerivedEEEDtptcvPT_Li0EsrNS_5Path1E1pERS2_", "decltype((test3::Derived*)(0)->test3::Path1::p) test3...