search for: test1d

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20 matches for "test1d".

Did you mean: test1
2015 Feb 04
0
[RFC PATCH v2] armv7(float): Optimize encode usecase using NE10 library
...t_map.c" +#endif +#elif defined(OPUS_X86_MAY_HAVE_SSE2) || defined(OPUS_X86_MAY_HAVE_SSE4_1) +#include "x86/x86cpu.c" +#endif #ifndef M_PI #define M_PI 3.141592653 @@ -93,13 +109,13 @@ void check(kiss_fft_cpx * in,kiss_fft_cpx * out,int nfft,int isinverse) } } -void test1d(int nfft,int isinverse) +void test1d(int nfft,int isinverse,int arch) { size_t buflen = sizeof(kiss_fft_cpx)*nfft; kiss_fft_cpx * in = (kiss_fft_cpx*)malloc(buflen); kiss_fft_cpx * out= (kiss_fft_cpx*)malloc(buflen); - kiss_fft_state *cfg = opus_fft_alloc(nfft,0,0); + kiss...
2015 Mar 03
0
[RFC PATCHv3] armv7(float): Optimize encode usecase using NE10 library
...;arm_celt_map.c" +#elif defined(OPUS_X86_MAY_HAVE_SSE2) || defined(OPUS_X86_MAY_HAVE_SSE4_1) +#include "x86/x86cpu.c" +#endif #ifndef M_PI #define M_PI 3.141592653 @@ -93,13 +109,13 @@ void check(kiss_fft_cpx * in,kiss_fft_cpx * out,int nfft,int isinverse) } } -void test1d(int nfft,int isinverse) +void test1d(int nfft,int isinverse,int arch) { size_t buflen = sizeof(kiss_fft_cpx)*nfft; kiss_fft_cpx * in = (kiss_fft_cpx*)malloc(buflen); kiss_fft_cpx * out= (kiss_fft_cpx*)malloc(buflen); - kiss_fft_state *cfg = opus_fft_alloc(nfft,0,0); + kiss...
2015 May 08
0
[[RFC PATCH v2]: Ne10 fft fixed and previous 1/8] armv7(float): Optimize encode usecase using NE10 library
...t_map.c" +#endif +#elif defined(OPUS_X86_MAY_HAVE_SSE2) || defined(OPUS_X86_MAY_HAVE_SSE4_1) +#include "x86/x86cpu.c" +#endif #ifndef M_PI #define M_PI 3.141592653 @@ -93,13 +110,13 @@ void check(kiss_fft_cpx * in,kiss_fft_cpx * out,int nfft,int isinverse) } } -void test1d(int nfft,int isinverse) +void test1d(int nfft,int isinverse,int arch) { size_t buflen = sizeof(kiss_fft_cpx)*nfft; kiss_fft_cpx * in = (kiss_fft_cpx*)malloc(buflen); kiss_fft_cpx * out= (kiss_fft_cpx*)malloc(buflen); - kiss_fft_state *cfg = opus_fft_alloc(nfft,0,0); + kiss...
2015 Mar 03
1
[RFC PATCH v4] Enable optimize using libNe10
Changes from RFC PATCH v3 - Just rebased on tip - For all else, please see notes from RFC PATCH v3 at http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/2015-March/002902.html - latest wip opus tree/branch https://git.linaro.org/people/viswanath.puttagunta/Ne10.git branch: rfcv4_final_fft_ne10 Viswanath Puttagunta (1): armv7(float): Optimize encode
2015 Feb 04
4
[RFC PATCH v2] Encode optimize using libNe10
Changes from RFC PATCH v1: - passing arch parameter explicitly - reduced stack usage by ~3.5K by using scaled NE10 fft version - moved all optimization array functions to arm_celt_map.c - Other cleanups pointed out by Timothy Phil, As you mentioned earlier, could you please address all compile and linker errors/warnings coming out of Ne10 library? You can find my working Ne10 repo at [1]
2015 Mar 03
2
[RFC PATCHv3] Encode optimize using libNe10
Changes from RFC PATCH v2 - fixed compile issue when just compiling for --enable-intrinsics for ARMv7 without NE10 - Notes for NE10: - All compile/link warnings are now in upstream NE10 - Only patch pending upstream in NE10 is the one that needs to add -funsafe-math-optimizations for ARMv7 targets. - Phil Wang @ ARM is working on getting this fixed. - Note that even without
2015 May 08
0
[[RFC PATCH v2]: Ne10 fft fixed and previous 8/8] test_unit_dft: Add nfft = 60, 240, 480 tests
...hanged, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/celt/tests/test_unit_dft.c b/celt/tests/test_unit_dft.c index 5ea10fb..111c249 100644 --- a/celt/tests/test_unit_dft.c +++ b/celt/tests/test_unit_dft.c @@ -177,8 +177,14 @@ int main(int argc,char ** argv) test1d(36,1,arch); test1d(50,0,arch); test1d(50,1,arch); + test1d(60,0,arch); + test1d(60,1,arch); test1d(120,0,arch); test1d(120,1,arch); + test1d(240,0,arch); + test1d(240,1,arch); + test1d(480,0,arch); + test1d(480,1,arch);...
2015 May 15
0
[RFC V3 6/8] test_unit_dft: Add nfft = 60, 240, 480 tests
...hanged, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/celt/tests/test_unit_dft.c b/celt/tests/test_unit_dft.c index e17e26f..f08eb65 100644 --- a/celt/tests/test_unit_dft.c +++ b/celt/tests/test_unit_dft.c @@ -177,8 +177,14 @@ int main(int argc,char ** argv) test1d(36,1,arch); test1d(50,0,arch); test1d(50,1,arch); + test1d(60,0,arch); + test1d(60,1,arch); test1d(120,0,arch); test1d(120,1,arch); + test1d(240,0,arch); + test1d(240,1,arch); + test1d(480,0,arch); + test1d(480,1,arch);...
2015 Mar 18
5
[RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Enable aarch64 intrinsics/Ne10
Hi All, Since I continue to base my work on top of Jonathan's patch, and my previous Ne10 fft/ifft/mdct_forward/backward patches, I thought it would be better to just post all new patches as a patch series. Please let me know if anyone disagrees with this approach. You can see wip branch of all latest patches at
2015 Mar 31
6
[RFC PATCH v1 0/5] aarch64: celt_pitch_xcorr: Fixed point series
Hi Timothy, As I mentioned earlier [1], I now fixed compile issues with fixed point and resubmitting the patch. I also have new patch that does intrinsics optimizations for celt_pitch_xcorr targetting aarch64. You can find my latest work-in-progress branch at [2] For reference, you can use the Ne10 pre-built libraries at [3] Note that I am working with Phil at ARM to get my patch at [4]
2015 May 08
8
[RFC PATCH v2]: Ne10 fft fixed and previous 0/8]
Hi All, As per Timothy's suggestion, disabling mdct_forward for fixed point. Only effects armv7,armv8: Extend fixed fft NE10 optimizations to mdct Rest of patches are same as in [1] For reference, latest wip code for opus is at [2] Still working with NE10 team at ARM to get corner cases of mdct_forward. Will update with another patch when issue in NE10 gets fixed. Regards, Vish [1]:
2015 May 15
11
[RFC V3 0/8] Ne10 fft fixed and previous
Hi All, Changes from RFC v2 [1] armv7,armv8: Extend fixed fft NE10 optimizations to mdct - Overflow issue fixed by Phil at ARM. Ne10 wip at [2]. Should be upstream soon. - So, re-enabled using fixed fft for mdct_forward which was disabled in RFCv2 armv7,armv8: Optimize fixed point fft using NE10 library - Thanks to Jonathan Lennox, fixed some build fixes on iOS and some copy-paste errors Rest
2015 Apr 28
10
[RFC PATCH v1 0/8] Ne10 fft fixed and previous
Hello Timothy / Jean-Marc / opus-dev, This patch series is follow up on work I posted on [1]. In addition to what was posted on [1], this patch series mainly integrates Fixed point FFT implementations in NE10 library into opus. You can view my opus wip code at [2]. Note that while I found some issues both with the NE10 library(fixed fft) and with Linaro toolchain (armv8 intrinsics), the
2015 Jan 20
6
[RFC PATCH v1 0/2] Encode optimize using libNE10
Hello opus-dev, I've been cooking up this patchset to integrate NE10 library into opus. Current patchset focuses on encode use case mainly effecting performance of clt_mdct_forward() and opus_fft() (for float only) Glad to report the following on Encode use case: (Measured on my Beaglebone Black Cortex-A8 board) - Performance improvement for encode use case ~= 12.34% (Based on time -p
2015 Jan 20
0
[RFC PATCH v1 2/2] armv7(float): Optimize encode usecase using NE10 library
...) +#include "arm/celt_ne10_fft.c" +#include "arm/arm_celt_ne10_fft_map.c" +#endif +#elif defined(OPUS_X86_MAY_HAVE_SSE2) || defined(OPUS_X86_MAY_HAVE_SSE4_1) +#include "x86/x86cpu.c" +#endif #ifndef M_PI #define M_PI 3.141592653 @@ -125,7 +135,7 @@ void test1d(int nfft,int isinverse) if (isinverse) opus_ifft(cfg,in,out); else - opus_fft(cfg,in,out); + opus_fft(cfg,in,out, opus_select_arch()); /*for (k=0;k<nfft;++k) printf("%d %d ", out[k].r, out[k].i);printf("\n");*/ @@ -153,10 +163,12...
2015 Jan 29
2
[RFC PATCH v1 2/2] armv7(float): Optimize encode usecase using NE10 library
...cpx *twiddles; > + void *priv; /* Used by arch specfic optimizations */ Wrong indentation. > } kiss_fft_state; Can I get a copy of the /* ARM NE10 library does not support below values */ comment you added below here as well? > +#ifndef HAVE_ARM_NE10 > test1d(36,0); > test1d(36,1); > test1d(50,0); > test1d(50,1); > +#endif > celt/static_modes_fixed.h \ > +celt/static_modes_float_arm_ne10.h \ > celt/arm/armcpu.h \ Wrong indentation. > celt/arm/fixed_armv4.h \ > ce...
2015 Jan 29
0
[RFC PATCH v1 2/2] armv7(float): Optimize encode usecase using NE10 library
...pecfic optimizations */ > > > Wrong indentation. > >> } kiss_fft_state; > > > Can I get a copy of the > /* ARM NE10 library does not support below values */ > comment you added below here as well? > >> +#ifndef HAVE_ARM_NE10 >> test1d(36,0); >> test1d(36,1); >> test1d(50,0); >> test1d(50,1); >> +#endif > > >> celt/static_modes_fixed.h \ >> +celt/static_modes_float_arm_ne10.h \ >> celt/arm/armcpu.h \ > > > Wrong indentation....
2015 Mar 04
0
[RFC PATCH v1] armv7(float): Optimize decode usecase using NE10 library
...; #endif /* end if !defined(OVERRIDE_OPUS_MDCT) */ diff --git a/celt/tests/test_unit_dft.c b/celt/tests/test_unit_dft.c index badc30c..84f69bd 100644 --- a/celt/tests/test_unit_dft.c +++ b/celt/tests/test_unit_dft.c @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ void test1d(int nfft,int isinverse,int arch) /*for (k=0;k<nfft;++k) printf("%d %d ", in[k].r, in[k].i);printf("\n");*/ if (isinverse) - opus_ifft(cfg,in,out); + opus_ifft(cfg,in,out, arch); else opus_fft(cfg,in,out, arch); diff --git a/c...
2015 Apr 28
0
[RFC PATCH v1 2/8] armv7(float): Optimize decode usecase using NE10 library
...; #endif /* end if !defined(OVERRIDE_OPUS_MDCT) */ diff --git a/celt/tests/test_unit_dft.c b/celt/tests/test_unit_dft.c index 991ece3..28f0238 100644 --- a/celt/tests/test_unit_dft.c +++ b/celt/tests/test_unit_dft.c @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ void test1d(int nfft,int isinverse,int arch) /*for (k=0;k<nfft;++k) printf("%d %d ", in[k].r, in[k].i);printf("\n");*/ if (isinverse) - opus_ifft(cfg,in,out); + opus_ifft(cfg,in,out, arch); else opus_fft(cfg,in,out, arch); diff --git a/c...
2015 Mar 04
1
[RFC PATCH v1] Decode(float) optimize using libNe10
Hello All, I extended the libNE10 optimizations for float towards mdct_backwards/opus_ifft. I am able to get about 14.26% improvement for Decode use case now on my Beaglebone Black. Please see [1] for measurements. Questions 1. Since this patch needs to go in after Encode [2] patch) should I submit this as patch series? 2. Since Jonathan Lennox posted intrinsics cleanup [3] patch,