search for: test13

...possible to transfer a call by pressing # followed by the extension, but it does not work. Although I have a call-limit of '4' and thus the peer I'm transfering to should be able to receive the transfer. [Jul 8 09:46:56] DTMF[22334] channel.c: DTMF begin '#' received on SIP/test13-0000000b [Jul 8 09:46:56] DTMF[22334] channel.c: DTMF begin passthrough '#' on SIP/test13-0000000b [Jul 8 09:46:56] DTMF[22334] channel.c: DTMF end '#' received on SIP/test13-0000000b, duration 320 ms [Jul 8 09:46:56] DTMF[22334] channel.c: DTMF end accepted with begin '#&...

http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/test/ - Hopefully OpenSSL is fixed :) - We sometimes produced invalid ENVELOPE with 8bit headers. That could really have broken things (broke it in test12). So, what's left is to make PAM work well..

http://dovecot.org/test/ - Several bugfixes, do maildir syncing problems still persist? - New %var handling code for default_mail_env / authentication things. Added: # %p - protocol (IMAP or POP3) # # You can apply a modifiers for each variable (eg. %Lp = pop3): # %L - lowercase # %U - uppercase # %E - escape '"', "'" and '\' characters by inserting

...token>'* dialplan : exten => pbx,n,Macro(CheckNetworkProblems,${custID}) exten => pbx,n,NoOp(status = ${STATUS}) exten => pbx,n,GoToIf($["${STATUS}"="congestion"]?backup:nocongestion) CLI : [Sep 9 12:27:07] -- Executing [pbx at cust:15] NoOp("SIP/test13-0000002a", "status = "congestion"") in new stack *[Sep 9 12:27:07] WARNING[5741]: ast_expr2.fl:445 ast_yyerror: ast_yyerror(): syntax error: syntax error, unexpected '<token>', expecting $end; Input: ""congestion""="congestion&quot...

Hello! im testing lazy_expunge_only_last_instance here and it seems it works wrong with IMAP MOVE IN: 14 uid move 13 "INBOX" OUT: * OK [COPYUID 1188569061 13 34] Moved UIDs. * 5 EXPUNGE 14 OK Move completed. dovecot.log: 2013-06-14 10:56:06 imap(test13 at mtx.ru): Info: copy from Test: box=INBOX, uid=34, msgid=<1294858169.32435.3.camel at int.office.matrix>, size=996, from=Pavel Volkovitskiy <int at mtx.ru>, subject=test, flags=(\Seen) 2013-06-14 10:56:06 imap(test13 at mtx.ru): Info: copy from Test: box=.EXPUNGED/Test, uid=9, msgid=&...

...out modter <- out modbis$Pn <- Q0bis modter$Pn <- Q0ter set.seed(1) x <- arima.sim(100,model=list(ar=phi,ma=theta)) s <- KalmanLike(x,mod=mod,fast=FALSE) sbis <- KalmanLike(x,modbis) ster <- KalmanLike(x,modter) test12 <- all.equal(out$Pn,Q0bis) test13 <- all.equal(out$Pn,Q0ter) test23 <- all.equal(Q0bis,Q0ter) list(eigen=min(eigen(out$Pn)$value),eigenbis=min(eigen(Q0bis)$value),eigenter=min(eigen(Q0ter)$value),test12=test12,test13=test13,test23=test23,s=s,sbis=sbis,ster=ster) } And the test on the values of phi and theta above: &g...

...n-capi and 1.4.4. and also, when sending with smsq -x only two of the messages are handled. (i thought, asterisk itself handles the queues ? ) Here the log: 2007-07-09T15:04:14 YOM04 0 - 0172xxxxxxx test11 2007-07-09T15:04:15 ?OM05 0 - 0172xxxxxxx test12 2007-07-09T15:07:51 YOM06 0 - 0172xxxxxxx test13 2007-07-09T15:07:53 ?OM07 0 - 0172xxxxxxx test14 sorry - i am a total newbie at asterisk. -- Mit freundlichen Gr?ssen Matthias Huber

Home again. Fixed SSL checking for Redhat 9, I hope. Could someone test if it actually works now? Also fixed a few compiler warnings. If this thing works, I'll just update the NEWS file and call it 0.99.10. http://dovecot.procontrol.fi/rc/ Near future plans include rewriting parts of index handling. At least .tree file will go, I've a _much_ better idea how to replace it. .data file is

...39;lastms' are filled with values. But after a while, these fields become empty. Asterisk CLI shows : asterisk*CLI> sip show peers Name/username Host Dyn Nat ACL Port Status Realtime sterk1/sterk1 192.168.1.102 D N 5062 OK (30 ms) Cached RT test13/test13 192.168.1.100 D N 5060 OK (4 ms) Cached RT test2/test2 192.168.1.102 D N 5061 OK (30 ms) Cached RT test6/test6 192.168.1.104 D N 5063 OK (12 ms) Cached RT So Asterisk is still aware of the realtime SIP peers, and they are still...

In doing my testing I''m wondering if maintaining backwards compatability for existing applications is important. The question boils down to this: Are there sufficient applications that are using wxRuby (pre swig) that we should expect to have to support all/most without changes or should we expect that most applications will need to learn the ''new'' ways things

...operdss mshare 4096 2010-09-28 16:39 .INBOX.test1 drwxrws--- 5 operdss mshare 4096 2010-10-05 15:33 .INBOX.test10 drwxrws--- 5 operdss mshare 4096 2010-10-06 16:42 .INBOX.test11 drwxrws--- 5 operdss mshare 4096 2010-10-07 10:35 .INBOX.test12 drwxrws--- 5 operdss mshare 4096 2010-10-07 11:26 .INBOX.test13 drwxrws--- 5 t1 mshare 4096 2010-09-28 16:39 .INBOX.test2 drwxrws--- 5 operdss mshare 4096 2010-09-29 13:52 .INBOX.test3 drwxrws--- 5 operdss mshare 4096 2010-09-29 13:52 .INBOX.test4 drwxrws--- 5 operdss mshare 4096 2010-09-29 15:56 .INBOX.test5 drwxrws--- 5 operdss mshare 4096 2010-09-29 15:57 .I...

...oat>>:2 [#uses=1] >> store <4 x float> %2, <4 x float>* null >> ret void >> - >> + >> ; CHECK-LABEL: test7: >> ; CHECK: xorps %xmm0, %xmm0 >> ; CHECK: movaps %xmm0, 0 >> @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ define void @test13(<4 x float>* %res, < >> store <4 x float> %tmp11, <4 x float>* %res >> ret void >> ; CHECK: test13 >> -; CHECK: shufps $69, (%eax), %xmm0 >> +; CHECK: shufps $69, (%ecx), %xmm0 >> ; CHECK: pshufd $-40, %xm...