Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "test11b".
Did you mean:
test111
2009 Aug 25
0
comparing tables from replicated data
...lt;- sum(val1[grp1==1]<max(val1[grp1==2]))
}
hist(TT)
table(TT)
TT
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2 5 126 407 408 117 9 1026 3171 879 3850
For the less complex model, the results on 1000 replicates are
"evidently" better than the TT default
table(test11b)
test11b
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
279 294 191 114 53 40 17 6 3 2 1
and for the more advanced model I get even more convincing
table(test11d)
test11d
0
1000
Clinically I can say that it is bad to have 1 in 16 misclassified and
therefore judge the complicated model...
2014 Nov 03
8
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Protection against stack-based memory corruption errors using SafeStack
...air, align 4
+ %b = alloca i32*, align 8
+ %y = getelementptr inbounds %struct.pair* %c, i32 0, i32 1
+ store i32* %y, i32** %b, align 8
+ %0 = load i32** %b, align 8
+ %call = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* getelementptr inbounds ([4 x i8]* @.str, i32 0, i32 0), i32* %0)
+ ret void
+}
+
+; test11b: Addr-of struct element. (GEP followed by store).
+; safestack attribute
+; Requires protector.
+define void @test11b() nounwind uwtable safestack {
+entry:
+; LINUX-I386: test11b:
+; LINUX-I386: movl __llvm__unsafe_stack_ptr
+; LINUX-I386-NEXT: movl %gs:
+
+; LINUX-I386: .cfi_endproc
+
+;...