search for: test03

...0 test01 at test.host.sk Group quota STORAGE 7 - 0 test01 at test.host.sk Group quota MESSAGE 3 - 0 test03 at test.host.sk User quota STORAGE 7 1024 0 test03 at test.host.sk User quota MESSAGE 3 - 0 test03 at test.host.sk Group quota STORAGE 7 -...

...0 >> test01 at test.host.sk Group quota STORAGE 7 - 0 >> test01 at test.host.sk Group quota MESSAGE 3 - 0 >> test03 at test.host.sk User quota STORAGE 7 1024 0 >> test03 at test.host.sk User quota MESSAGE 3 - 0 >> test03 at test.host.sk Group quota STORAGE...

...0 > test01 at test.host.sk Group quota STORAGE 7 - 0 > test01 at test.host.sk Group quota MESSAGE 3 - 0 > test03 at test.host.sk User quota STORAGE 7 1024 0 > test03 at test.host.sk User quota MESSAGE 3 - 0 > test03 at test.host.sk Group quota STORAGE 7 -...

...nd mail (with SMTP) and to get mail (with POP3). When the java code get a mail, it deletes it from mailbox (the flag "DELETED" is set to true). When I send a mail on server A, I can see the mail replicated on both servers A and B : a file containing the message data exists in /home/vmail/test03/new/ in both sides. When I get the mail from server A with my java POP3 client, all is OK : the mail is deleted on both servers A and B (no more file in /home/vmail/test03/new/). The problem is when I send a mail on server A and I get it from server B : I can get the mail, but the mail is not dele...

Try this : #source: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/heimdal/+bug/1484262 Add in /etc/krb5.conf in [libdefaults] ignore_k5login = true Did it help? If (as in my case) root is not allowed in the user homdirs it can validateon $HOME/.k5login Above fixed it for me. I only cant tell based on the config if this applies to you. Its a simple thing to try. Greetz, Louis

Hi, Brand new VM's running on ESXi replacing existing Samba 3 NT domain. I am not quite brand new but this is my first time for this combination. Would like to use Win Ad for authentication and Samba for 20 users and company shared data. Started with this how-to: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Samba_as_a_Domain_Member Lost my way on Choose backend for id mapping in winbindd

...orkgroup = HO > ??? idmap config ho : range = 10000-999999 > ??? idmap config ho : backend = rid > ??? idmap config * : range = 3000-7999 > ??? idmap config * : backend = tdb > ??? map acl inherit = Yes > ??? printing = bsd > ??? vfs objects = acl_xattr > > > [test03] > ??? path = /0data/smb_shares/test03/ > ??? read only = No > > > # /etc/samba/user.map > !root = HO\Administrator HO\administrator administrator > > > > Thanks in advance, > > mtg > > > > > On 2020-06-24 12:00 a.m., Rowland penny via...

...ck, but I am authorized. Last bit of information that I don't know whether it means anything or not: [root at machine01 samba]# wbinfo -g <snip> DOMAIN+tstgrp01 DOMAIN+tstgrp02 [root at stltrh4ldap01 samba]# getent group root:x:0:root <snip> request 1 done tstgrp01:*:10000:test04,test03,test02 tstgrp02:*:10001:test04,test03,test02 request 2 done Getent is not applying the DOMAIN+ on the front of each group in the password file. Not sure if it's supposed to or not. Note that nsswitch.conf reads: passwd: files ldap [TRYAGAIN=continue] winbind shadow: files group:...

...: range = 10000-999999 >> ??? idmap config ho : backend = rid >> ??? idmap config * : range = 3000-7999 >> ??? idmap config * : backend = tdb >> ??? map acl inherit = Yes >> ??? printing = bsd >> ??? vfs objects = acl_xattr >> >> >> [test03] >> ??? path = /0data/smb_shares/test03/ >> ??? read only = No >> >> >> # /etc/samba/user.map >> !root = HO\Administrator HO\administrator administrator >> >> >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> mtg >> >> >> &g...

So yesterday I got was able to get a domU successfully using a PCI SCSI card. This morning I restarted the host server. When I try to start up the same domU I get this error: Error: pci: improper device assignment specified: pci: 0000:0e:04.0 must be co-assigned to the same guest with 0000:0e:04.0, but it is not owned by pciback. How do I make this card owned by pciback on reboot. Do I need to

These are my thoughts on adding a test harness to run tests instead of using automake. The aim of this exercise is to allow us to run the full test suite on an installed copy of libguestfs. Another aim is to allow us to work around all the limitations and problems of automake. The first patch makes an observation that since the ./run script sets up $PATH to contain all the directories