Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "tersity".
Did you mean:
ersity
2015 Jan 19
2
[LLVMdev] Dropping the DW_ prefix from names in dwarfdump
Hey guys,
Frederic is introducing the expression dumping support and in the interests
of tersity is skipping the "DW_" in every "DW_OP" (heck, we could even skip
the "OP" given the context - nothing else textual can appear there, right?)
Any thoughts on skipping the "DW_" (maybe even the AT/TAG/FORM too) in the
rest of dwarfdump? (skipping the AT/TAG (F...
2015 Jan 19
2
[LLVMdev] Dropping the DW_ prefix from names in dwarfdump
...t;aprantl at apple.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On Jan 19, 2015, at 10:08 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com <mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hey guys,
>>
>> Frederic is introducing the expression dumping support and in the interests of tersity is skipping the "DW_" in every "DW_OP" (heck, we could even skip the "OP" given the context - nothing else textual can appear there, right?)
I think it always depends on what you are debugging. When I’m interested whether the encoding is correct, I think I’d prefer to...
2015 Jan 19
2
[LLVMdev] Dropping the DW_ prefix from names in dwarfdump
...rote:
>>
>>
>>> On Jan 19, 2015, at 10:08 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com <mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey guys,
>>>
>>> Frederic is introducing the expression dumping support and in the interests of tersity is skipping the "DW_" in every "DW_OP" (heck, we could even skip the "OP" given the context - nothing else textual can appear there, right?)
>
> I think it always depends on what you are debugging. When I’m interested whether the encoding is correct, I think I’d...
2015 Jan 20
2
[LLVMdev] Dropping the DW_ prefix from names in dwarfdump
...AM, Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com<mailto:aprantl at apple.com>> wrote:
On Jan 19, 2015, at 10:08 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com<mailto:dblaikie at gmail.com>> wrote:
Hey guys,
Frederic is introducing the expression dumping support and in the interests of tersity is skipping the "DW_" in every "DW_OP" (heck, we could even skip the "OP" given the context - nothing else textual can appear there, right?)
I think it always depends on what you are debugging. When I’m interested whether the encoding is correct, I think I’d prefer to...
2015 Oct 14
4
RFC: Introducing an LLVM Community Code of Conduct
Hi,
Given David's comments about an echo-chamber, I thought I might as well
throw my oar in and say I'm strongly in favour of this.
I'm not particularly fussed on the wordsmithing or the verbosity. In fact
one of the (unfortunate) primary uses of this document surely will be as
reference when a misbehavior occurs, so spelling at least some things out
in full might be useful in that