search for: terrified

Whenever I format a flash drive I'm always terrified that I'm going to fat-finger something in the terminal and accidentally blow away a partition on one of my hard drives. *shudder* Is gparted the best gui to handle this task? Or is there something better? I'd really prefer something more limited that just allows me to select whatever it...

I am currently (still) running Fedora 17 --- having not managed to screw my courage to the sticking place and upgrade. Even though we are now up to Fedora 20, I think. The traffic on the Fedora mailing list on the upgrading issue is a bit terrifying. I would just like to confirm that: It is ***NOT*** possible to download a binary of R for Fedora 17. Is this correct? My efforts to

Chris, nice segue to Swift ! :-), but... The question is what should LLVM do with UB in general, saying that we are going to change one specific idiom from undefined to defined glosses over the real question: why should we ever optimize / delete any UB at all ? This “depressing and faintly terrifying thing” as you call it, should be viewed not as an opportunity for optimization, but

...) to undef >> if ((intptr_t)(&t) < 10) print("X"); >> } >> > The first one at least is UB, but as Richard pointed out the scope > is certainly broader than atomics (it's not even just well-defined > non-deterministism). > > I'm kind of terrified by the implications. Me too. :( > >> -- Sanjoy >> >>>> >>>> Not that I'm sure that will end up being a helpful distinction. >>> >>> Right. See Richard's comment. I think that sums up the real issue here. =/ > _____________________...

...This would at least allow us to do bottom-up deduction to catch interprocedural cases. But it would become incredibly subtle that this is only valid prior to *any* transformations of the comdat-containing functions. I'm starting to think this subtle rule might be worth it. But I'm frankly terrified by the implications. On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 8:13 PM Philip Reames via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On 02/24/2016 08:10 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith via llvm-dev wrote: > >> On 2016-Feb-24, at 19:46, Sanjoy Das <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com&gt...

...sync for windows to help a client backup her USB key after using it. I want the cwRsync_GUI_CLIENT to execute the equivalent of this command: rsync -rave "ssh -p 922" /cygdrive/e user at machine.domain.com:USBKey Can anyone tell me how to do so?? Like most windows users, my client is terrified of the command prompt. Thanks Richard -- LinuxCabal Asociación Civil Ing. Richard Couture Novell CNE, ECNE, MCNE HP/Compaq ASE Tel.: (+52) (333) 145-2638 Cel.: (+52) (044) 333 377-7505 Web: http://www.LinuxCabal.org E-Mail: rrc at linuxcabal.org Hosted en la nube Cloud Sigma - www.CloudSigma....

> On Jul 6, 2017, at 3:07 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at nondot.org> wrote: > > >> On Jul 6, 2017, at 2:05 PM, Peter Lawrence via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> >>> On Jul 6, 2017, at 1:00 PM, via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>>

Hi all, I can't find a working archive search for this list, so please forgive me if this has been discussed before. Has any thought been given to supporting websockets in the ssh client? I'm talking about solely using a websocket as the transport layer, and leaving the actual protocol intact, as opposed to the (to me, frankly terrifying) idea of allowing a web server to act as an ssh

ERMX Continues To Expand As Stock Climbs Up 16.6%! EntreMetrix Inc. (ERMX) $0.21 UP 16.6% ERMX announced further expansion with K-9 Genetics. Healthy and Premium dog foods grossed $3.6 Billion in 2006, up from $1.9 billion in previous years. Read up on ERMX over the holiday, we think you will see even more fireworks on Thursday morning! I may need one like this. " "Happy" and

ERMX Continues To Expand As Stock Climbs Up 16.6%! EntreMetrix Inc. (ERMX) $0.21 UP 16.6% ERMX announced further expansion with K-9 Genetics. Healthy and Premium dog foods grossed $3.6 Billion in 2006, up from $1.9 billion in previous years. Read up on ERMX over the holiday, we think you will see even more fireworks on Thursday morning! I may need one like this. " "Happy" and

...o be ignored, it should be relatively easy to dispose of them with multiple return values. (Part of this (very long-term) work would be to decide if it's better to pass flags as input and return the OR (as currently is done in hardware) or to keep the OR separate.) Right now, I'm somewhat terrified of supporting LLVM users. I don't see how it catches any of the implicit data dependencies that occur in the floating-point environment... Other compilers finally are working with the FPU environment, but LLVM's link-time optimizations without any of the barriers seems capable of wreaking...

...w us > to do bottom-up deduction to catch interprocedural cases. But it > would become incredibly subtle that this is only valid prior to > *any* transformations of the comdat-containing functions. > I'm starting to think this subtle rule might be worth it. But I'm > frankly terrified by the implications. > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 8:13 PM Philip Reames via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > wrote: > > On 02/24/2016 08:10 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith via llvm-dev wrote: > > > >> On 2016-Feb-24, at 19:46, Sanjoy Das < > > >>...

...to do bottom-up > deduction to catch interprocedural cases. But it would become incredibly > subtle that this is only valid prior to *any* transformations of the > comdat-containing functions. > > I'm starting to think this subtle rule might be worth it. But I'm frankly > terrified by the implications. > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 8:13 PM Philip Reames via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On 02/24/2016 08:10 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith via llvm-dev wrote: >> >> On 2016-Feb-24, at 19:46, Sanjoy Das <sa...

Hi, as a language front end developer I am a bit terrified by any "unwind here will call terminate" semantics in the IR. I'd prefer the LLVM IR to be free from any assumptions about the languages compiled to it and this looks like C++ semantics sneaking into LLVM. Thus I'm under the expression the calling terminate semantics shoul...

On 05/06/2016 09:02 AM, Rafael Espíndola via llvm-dev wrote: >>> Say what you want about the Linux kernel community, but you can't >>> call >>> it immature. You can call the behaviour of some of its people >>> immature, but the community itself is not by a long shot. >> But there are reasonable people who will not interact with that community because

...that because the rep function had been blocked. It was very frustrating to me. Professor Ripley spotted the error and posed a message called "Don't use the names of R functions as variable names" http://www.mail-archive.com/r-help at stat.math.ethz.ch/msg11585.html. After that, I was terrified that any name I used might conflict with a built in R function name. Last month, i saw a student here with a political model and he used rep as a variable in a regression model, it seemed to work just fine. I surmise that the rise in usage of namespaces in R packages accounts for that? I'm so...

On Aug 7, 2013, at 5:12 PM, Michele Scandale <michele.scandale at gmail.com> wrote: > On 08/08/2013 02:02 AM, Justin Holewinski wrote: >> This worries me a bit. This would introduce language-specific >> processing into SelectionDAG. OpenCL maps address spaces one way, other >> languages map them in other ways. Currently, it is the job of the >> front-end to map

...p deduction to catch interprocedural cases. But it > > would become incredibly subtle that this is only valid prior to > > *any* transformations of the comdat-containing functions. > > > I'm starting to think this subtle rule might be worth it. But I'm > > frankly terrified by the implications. > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 8:13 PM Philip Reames via llvm-dev < > > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > wrote: > > > > On 02/24/2016 08:10 PM, Duncan P. N. Exon Smith via llvm-dev wrote: > > > > > >> On 2016-Feb-24, at 19:46, Sa...

LLVM Friends, First time attempting a build of dragonegg, using our shiny new install of clang-3.3. I'm clearly off to a terrifying start! dragonegg-3.3.src$ CXX=/usr/bin/gcc GCC=/usr/bin/gcc ENABLE_LLVM_PLUGINS=1 LLVM_CONFIG=/usr/bin/llvm-config CFLAGS=-I/usr/clang/3.3/lib/clang/3.3/include CXXFLAGS="-I/usr/clang/3.3/lib/clang/3.3/include" make Compiling

Hello, http://pasik.reaktio.net/xen/patches/xen-pvscsi-drivers-linux-2.6.32.27-pvops-v01.diff This is the first version of Xen PVSCSI drivers, both the scsiback backend and scsifront frontend, ported from Novell SLES11SP1 2.6.32 Xenlinux kernel to pvops xen/stable-2.6.32.x branch. At the moment it''s *only* compile-tested with the latest xen/stable-2.6.32.x git kernel as of today