search for: terminologies

Jeroen Dobbelaere via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > Hi Jesper, > >> Thanks, these are interesting differences. The CHAR_BIT and byte >> relation is established in the C standard and I would prefer the byte >> terminology. It means the same thing as addressable unit but is a bit >> shorter and probably more widely known. > > Looking

Whereas we typically refer to the add-on `modules' as `libraries' (viz also the way these are represented in the search list, and the variable .Libraries), S speaks about `sections'. Shall we stay with our terminology? Or instead, speak of `sections', `packages', `modules', ...? -k =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- r-devel

Hello everyone, I''ve been working on an internal best practices document that also tackled giving proper terms to things that were at the time uncoined. But looks like we have a bit of a merge problem as other terms have been floating around that seem to conflict with some terms we''ve been using internally at my organization. I''m hoping we can discuss and

Hello R-Members, can anyone explain the difference between multiple and multivariate regression to me in terms of the terminology and eventually its respect to the mathematical foundation respectively ? Is multiple regression perhaps more related to GLM and multivariate Regression rather applied, if there are no explizit numeric factor levels ? Thanks for elucidations on that topic. Many

I agree, addressable unit size is probably a better abstraction. However, in the lib/CodeGen directory alone, there's some 785 uses of the word "byte" and a significant fraction of the code that we want to modify is using the byte terminology today. An example of unmodified code from my showcase patch set: assert(!(Shift & 0x7) == 0 && "Shifts not

Hi, On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 10:28:14AM -0700, Easwar Hariharan wrote: > On 3/29/2024 10:16 AM, Andi Shyti wrote: > > Hi Easwar, > > > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 05:00:26PM +0000, Easwar Hariharan wrote: > >> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C specifications have replaced "master/slave" > > > > I don't understand why we forget that i3c is 1.1.1 :-)

I'm having a minor disagreement with a colleague over terminology. When you have a group of KVM Hosts which have access to the same network and storage (for purposes of migration) yet there is no clusterware or HA software involved...how does one refer to this group of hosts? I call them a "Host Group." He insists on the term "Cluster." To me, "cluster"

Brian Ripley wrote (to somebody asking about "effect sizes"): > ... > Given that, I wonder if you are used to standard terminology. Good point. But I think for many of us there is more behind that. I personally belong to an (apparently fairly large) group of R users who may be enthusiastic, but are statistical laymen due to a lack of formal education in the area. The

Hello fellow NUTs :) Some time ago an issue https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/840 was raised, and with current work underway to publish a standard on NUT protocol it became more urgent - to retire the master/slave terminology from NUT configuration and documentation. I looked around for suitable synonyms, and for our primary use-case with upsmon roles - where it either manages an

Hello fellow NUTs :) Some time ago an issue https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/840 was raised, and with current work underway to publish a standard on NUT protocol it became more urgent - to retire the master/slave terminology from NUT configuration and documentation. I looked around for suitable synonyms, and for our primary use-case with upsmon roles - where it either manages an

Jim, The terminology I recall for that one-to-many relationship is publisher-subscriber. Larry Baker US Geological Survey 650-329-5608 baker at usgs.gov<mailto:baker at usgs.gov> On Mar 12 2021, at 6:24:38 PM, Phil Stracchino via Nut-upsuser <nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net<mailto:nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net>> wrote: This email has been received from

Jim, The terminology I recall for that one-to-many relationship is publisher-subscriber. Larry Baker US Geological Survey 650-329-5608 baker at usgs.gov<mailto:baker at usgs.gov> On Mar 12 2021, at 6:24:38 PM, Phil Stracchino via Nut-upsuser <nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net<mailto:nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net>> wrote: This email has been received from

In ?exists it says: inherits: should the enclosing frames of the environment be searched? I believe what it is saying is that if inherits is TRUE and it fails to find the variable it will look in the parent environment and the parent of the parent, etc. (as opposed to looking in the calling frame next and the caller of the caller, etc.) Now I thought that standard terminology in R was: 1.

I didn't go there due to its use by Cisco. On Fri, Mar 12, 2021, 10:03 PM Baker, Lawrence M via Nut-upsuser < nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> wrote: > Jim, > > The terminology I recall for that one-to-many relationship is > publisher-subscriber. > > Larry Baker > US Geological Survey > 650-329-5608 > baker at usgs.gov > > > > On Mar 12

I didn't go there due to its use by Cisco. On Fri, Mar 12, 2021, 10:03 PM Baker, Lawrence M via Nut-upsuser < nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> wrote: > Jim, > > The terminology I recall for that one-to-many relationship is > publisher-subscriber. > > Larry Baker > US Geological Survey > 650-329-5608 > baker at usgs.gov > > > > On Mar 12

That is terminology from Computer Science. (Decades ago?) It is familiar. Not invented by Cisco. As in, producer-consumer, from the same time. Those were all different paradigms for client-server relationships. There must be Wikipedia citations that can be consulted. As I recall, there were distinctions, such as, producer-consumer were tightly bound, where the producer had no purpose

That is terminology from Computer Science. (Decades ago?) It is familiar. Not invented by Cisco. As in, producer-consumer, from the same time. Those were all different paradigms for client-server relationships. There must be Wikipedia citations that can be consulted. As I recall, there were distinctions, such as, producer-consumer were tightly bound, where the producer had no purpose

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2567 Bug ID: 2567 Summary: Wrong terminology used for ssh-keygen "-m" option Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.6p1 Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Documentation Assignee:

READ READ READ .... http://www.asteriskdocs.org/en/3rd_Edition/asterisk-book-html-chunk/asterisk-DP-Basics.html Regards, Mitul Limbani, Business Head, Enterux Solutions Pvt. Ltd. 110 Reena Complex, Opp. Nathani Steel, Vidyavihar (W), Mumbai - 400 086. India http://www.enterux.com/ http://www.entvoice.com/ email: mitul at enterux.in DID: +91-22-71967196 Cell: +91-9820332422 On Sun, Feb 22,

On 3/12/21 9:14 PM, Rusty Bower wrote: > Manager/subscriber seems most accurate > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 12, 2021, at 20:13, Douglas Parsons <doug at parsonsemail.com> wrote: >> >> ? >> In place of secondary how about subscriber? It would be accurate to >> the role. I'd been going to suggest controller and ... something.