search for: terasa

...e other alloc implementations, and removed the thereby obsolete alloc.c implementation from grabbag. Second, I just wrapped FLAC__clz_soft_uint32 with an #ifndef __MINGW32__. I tested the patch for both Linux and MinGW32 compiles, and both result in functional programs. kind regards, Christoph Terasa -------------- next part -------------- diff --git include/share/alloc.h include/share/alloc.h index 7aa17f7..3f2f2c7 100644 --- include/share/alloc.h +++ include/share/alloc.h @@ -110,7 +110,14 @@ static inline void *safe_malloc_add_4op_(size_t size1, size_t size2, size_t size return safe_malloc...

There are several links to Windows compiles in the Hydrogenaudio thread for FLAC 1.3.0 at http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=101082 . On Unices or Linuxes building from git should be straightforward enough, or you wait until the distributions/package maintainers catch up. Also, congratulations to the whole development team for reinvigorating FLAC! Christoph On

Christoph Terasa wrote: > Since MS refuses to support C99, the common practice is to use either > > sprintf_s: > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ce3zzk1k(v=VS.80).aspx > _snprintf_s: > http://msdn.microsoft.com/de-de/library/f30dzcf6(v=VS.80).aspx > > The former can be...

...ents of flac-dev digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Flac 1.3.0pre3 NOT lossless. (Marcus Johnson) > 2. FLAC 1.3.0pre3 NOT lossless (Marcus Johnson) > 3. Re: FLAC 1.3.0pre3 NOT lossless (Martijn van Beurden) > 4. Re: FLAC 1.3.0pre3 NOT lossless (Christoph Terasa) > 5. flac 1.3.0 NOT lossless (Marcus Johnson) > 6. Re: flac 1.3.0 NOT lossless (Martijn van Beurden) > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Marcus Johnson <bumblebritches57 at gmail.com> > To: flac-dev at xiph.org > Cc: > Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013...

...ction around StringCchPrintfExA could get you enough information to emulate snprintf well. But sprintf_s might be good enough for the limited uses inside flac, as you said. Sent from my iPhone On Mar 14, 2013, at 9:09 PM, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> wrote: > Christoph Terasa wrote: > >> Since MS refuses to support C99, the common practice is to use either >> >> sprintf_s: >> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ce3zzk1k(v=VS.80).aspx >> _snprintf_s: >> http://msdn.microsoft.com/de-de/library/f30dzcf6(v=VS.80).aspx &g...

Hi all, There are a bunch of sprintf calls in the FLAC code base and I'd like to replace them with calls to snprintf but I know that can cause problems with at least some versions of Visual Studio. Whats the current state of play in this regard? Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/

Cristian Rodr?guez wrote: > On 03/05/2013 03:32 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > > May look at CMake after this current release. > > That will make the situation reverse, that is, better for windows, > insane for the rest of the world. *If* I get around to it, it will be in a branch, not in mainline. I see FLAC as FOSS/libre software. It is firmly targeted at

Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > lvqcl, > > Would you be able to have alook at this one? I think its > Windows related: > > https://sourceforge.net/p/flac/feature-requests/114/ > The relevant changes are <http://git.xiph.org/?p=flac.git;a=commitdiff;h=6a6207b52a86b1d7980a5233e297c0fc948bed7d> and

On 3/5/2013 7:54 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Cristian Rodr?guez wrote: > >> On 03/05/2013 03:32 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: >> >>> May look at CMake after this current release. >> That will make the situation reverse, that is, better for windows, >> insane for the rest of the world. > *If* I get around to it, it will be in a branch, not in

On 3/14/2013 8:00 AM, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Hi all, > > There are a bunch of sprintf calls in the FLAC code base and I'd like > to replace them with calls to snprintf but I know that can cause > problems with at least some versions of Visual Studio. > > Whats the current state of play in this regard? > > Erik Since MS refuses to support C99, the common

On 12/10/2015 5:58 PM, lvqcl wrote: > Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: >> lvqcl, >> >> Would you be able to have alook at this one? I think its >> Windows related: >> >> https://sourceforge.net/p/flac/feature-requests/114/ >> > > The relevant changes are >