search for: teoh

bio_add_page() requires non-NULL bio ptr for dereferencing. Signed-off-by: Peter Teoh <htmldeveloper@gmail.com> --- extent_io.c.orig1 2008-03-16 12:43:59.000000000 +0800 +++ extent_io.c 2008-03-16 12:45:03.000000000 +0800 @@ -1729,6 +1729,7 @@ static int submit_extent_page(int rw, st if (bio_ret && *bio_ret) { bio = *bio_ret; +...

sorry, ignore my earlier email. I followed this: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42881901/how-to-compile-some-modules-in-llvm-with-debug-mode-others-with-release-mode and got the debug build completed. On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 10:02 AM Peter Teoh <htmldeveloper at gmail.com> wrote: > will this help? > > > https://opensource.apple.com/source/lldb/lldb-69/docs/building-with-debug-llvm.txt.auto.html > > On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 9:04 AM m m via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > wrote: > >> Hi, >...

...n one of my partition. Mistakes, it was my data partition (ext3 based). I have not yet mounted the device, but the mkfs.btrfs continued to completion. Is it possible to salvage my ext3 filesystem? Anyway to reverse the effect of mkfs.btrfs? Thank you for your help/answer. -- Regards, Peter Teoh

Hi My goal is that given a binary and the corresponding input. I want to know what IR level basic blocks are covered. I need the detail information, which is the set of all the covered BBs rather than just a number. I want to know whether there are some tools that can support this requirements. If not, I think maybe instrumentation can helps. However, I do not know too much about this. Any

...1, Mem @ 0xfd000000/16777216, 0xc0000000/268435456, 0xfa000000/33554432, I/O @ 0x00009c00/128, BIOS @ 0x????????/131072 (==) Matched nv for the autoconfigured driver New driver is "nv" (==) Using default built-in configuration (30 lines) Any other information needed? -- Regards, Peter Teoh

.../ Target-dependent interfaces > //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===// > include "ABCRegisterInfo.td" include "ABC.td" | > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* Peter Teoh <htmldeveloper at gmail.com> > *Sent:* Sunday, January 6, 2019 12:10 AM > *To:* m m > *Cc:* via llvm-dev > *Subject:* Re: [llvm-dev] empty list assertion > sorry, ignore my earlier email. > > I followed this: > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42881901/how-to-compi...

Hi, I'm trying to do a Debug build for the 1st time and I keep getting this assertion: llvm-tblgen: CodeGenDAGPatterns.cpp:64: llvm::EEVT::TypeSet::TypeSet(llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::MVT::SimpleValueType>): Assertion `!VTList.empty() && "empty list?"' failed. I do not know what list this assertion is referring to. Does anyone know? I always did Release builds before

...rs make[2]: *** [projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/CMakeFiles/clang_rt.builtins-x86_64.dir/x86_64/floatdidf.c.o] Error 1 make[1]: *** [projects/compiler-rt/lib/builtins/CMakeFiles/clang_rt.builtins-x86_64.dir/all] Error 2 make: *** [all] Error 2 Can anyone comment on the error? -- Regards, Peter Teoh

...d, I supposed it will need a patch before systemtap can be used to probe the Xen hypervisor, right? Or is it not a logical thing to do? My target of interest will be to trace/analyze the behavior of the Xen hypervisor, and the domX guest as well. Thank you for your answer. -- Regards, Peter Teoh _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Hi All, I am trying to read group descriptor from disk. I am able to read the superblock structure successfully. But I am not getting successful to get the group descriptor. Here is my code. Please check out what is missing. #include<linux/ext3_fs.h> #include<sys/types.h> #include<sys/stat.h> #include<stdio.h> #include<unistd.h> #include<fcntl.h>

I would like to know approximately the overall execution flow when the guest O/S page fault - how is the page fault transfer to a page fault in the host O/S? Thanks. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

...gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html, assuming that > either you're building with gcc, or that Clang has the same > interpretation of "pedantic"). Again, by default, LLVM_ENABLE_WERROR > is set to OFF, so it should normally remain a warning. > > On 12/1/15, Peter Teoh via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> While doing a make on the recently checkout version: >> >> I got the following errors: >> >> [ 68%] Built target dd >> [ 68%] Built target compiler-rt-headers >> [ 68%] Building C object >> pro...

...40 6a 00 6a 00 ff 75 34 ff 75 30 ff 75 0c ff 75 08 e8 84 f6 ff ff 83 c4 40 85 c0 74 04 <0f> 0b eb fe 8b 45 08 8b 55 0c 01 46 58 11 56 5c 8b 4d bc 01 81 EIP: [<f8b936b3>] btrfs_alloc_extent+0xba/0x328 [btrfs] SS:ESP 0068:f7945c20 ---[ end trace 41a23788337ff97c ]--- -- Regards, Peter Teoh

Hi, The test-suite expects to be built standalone but it looks like you have it in the same tree as LLVM. You'll need to remove it. From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Peter Teoh via llvm-dev Sent: 28 February 2016 14:31 To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] [3.8 Release] We have branched With reference to the following thread: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-January/094100.html I am having the same issue. First I did a git pull of a...

With reference to the following thread: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-January/094100.html I am having the same issue. First I did a git pull of all the relevant directories and then doing a cmake: cmake -DLLVM_ENABLE_DOXYGEN=ON -DLLVM_ENABLE_WERROR=OFF -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD="X86" ../llvm and followed by make: [ 22%] Built target LLVMVectorize [ 25%] Built target

...com/questions/2778638/libvirt-and-virtualbox-getting-started > Regards, > Julian Zhou > > _______________________________________________ > libvirt-users mailing list > libvirt-users@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvirt-users > -- Regards, Peter Teoh

kmem_cache_alloc() only return two possible value: NULL for error, and non-NULL for valid pointer. IS_ERR() check for return value is not right, I guessed? -- Regards, Peter Teoh -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: wrong_is_err_check.patch Type: text/x-patch Size: 385 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/btrfs-devel/attachments/20080315/6a95c261/wrong_is_err_check.bin

For example, how much power would a server with 3 of the TDM2400P fully loaded cards draw? We're trying to figure out what APC power we should have to achieve approx 30 minutes back-up time. Would appreciate any learnings or methods on calculating the power draw and determining the appropriate back-up device. Thank you. Melisa.

At the present moment, my guest is running inside qemu and host is kvm intel, running Ubuntu 14.04, kernel is 4.3.0 stable. From within the guest, when I run "hdparm -i /dev/sdb" on the guest, I get: HDIO_GET_IDENTITY failed: Invalid argument as the error,but on the host, I will get the full harddisk/SSD info. Can I know how to resolve this so that the output is the same for both