search for: tennant2

Hi, Guus The use case the shared default gateway for multi-tenant, if that the case the node who own the default gateway will have problem to route with different tenant who has overlapped address scope? Is it true when no any other tools like the namespaces? (tenant1)\ (tenant2)——common node—— shared gw node—— Internet (tenant3)/ But if the each tenant have it’s dedicate default gateway, but

...—— Internet Yes, here it would work, assuming you have three tinc daemons running on the common node with netnames tenant1, 2 and 3, because then the layout is logically more like: (tenant1)--(common node netname tennant1) \ / gw for tennant1 -- Internet (tenant2)--(common node netname tennant2) -- Internet -- gw for tennant2 -- Internet (tenant3)--(common node netname tennant3) / \ gw for tennant3 -- Internet Because you have three separate VPNs in effect, traffic between the common node and the gateways is completely separated. -- Met vriendelijke groet / with kind regards...