search for: tenebras

This morning I found a frozen box. On the console was this: ad0: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting ata0: resetting devices .. ata0-slave: ATA identify retries exceeded done After reboot, those messages were found in /var/log/messages. I'm running FreeBSD 4.8-RC from Apr 4 10:45:49 EST 2003. Any ideas? -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/

Hello, I'm Berserker, author of Berserker at Quake2 and Berserker at Quake3 projects. Page: http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=application&iId=10672 has the incorrect information. Bers at Q2 not based on a quake2evolved and does not contains any q2e code! Bers at Q2 base on Quake2 and some ideas and code from early Tenebrae. Thanx. PS: my primary e-mail on @mail.ru was banned

Exchange 12 will support "OVA" Outlook Voice Access. It will do this using VOIP. I was wondering if anyone has given any thought as to how Asterisk might interface with Exchange 12. It will do this using a VOIP gateway. If this could happen it seems to me this could be a really big win for Asterisk. I am going to setup a test server as soon as I can and start digging into this.

It will be interesting to see how many standards get broken, and how many proprietary hooks get thrown into the pot. The bean counters smell some money, and their OS franchise is waning: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/26/technology/26soft.html -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

...nd the proxy has no idea that protocol conversion is needed) Is my understanding of the code correct and if so was this something that was just missed or a design decision. -- Dr. Rodney G. McDuff |Ex ignorantia ad sapientiam Manager, Strategic Technologies Group| Ex luce ad tenebras Information Technology Services | The University of Queensland | EMAIL: mcduff@its.uq.edu.au | TELEPHONE: +61 7 3365 8220 |

...PowerEdge 2850 has anyone had problems (or any other useful experience) getting a TE411P to work with it. I also have a legacy TE110P. Has anyone had problems with this combo. -- Dr. Rodney G. McDuff |Ex ignorantia ad sapientiam Manager, Strategic Technologies Group| Ex luce ad tenebras Information Technology Services | The University of Queensland | EMAIL: mcduff@its.uq.edu.au | TELEPHONE: +61 7 3365 8220 |

I got some weird mail back, claiming that my e-mail was blocked, w/o indicating what server was blocked, after the mail appeared in the mailing list. Is this some BS shakedown? I use postfix on a DSL line forwarding to earthlink, this is hardly something that should be rare in the BSD world... the mail appeared to come from a web mail server and the first link has the following lovely text:

This affects only 3.7p1 and 3.7.1p1. The advice to leave PAM disabled is far from heartening, nor is the semi-lame blaming the PAM spec for implementation bugs. I happen to like OPIE for remote access. Subject: Portable OpenSSH Security Advisory: sshpam.adv This document can be found at: http://www.openssh.com/txt/sshpam.adv 1. Versions affected: Portable OpenSSH versions 3.7p1

Does anyone have any ideas why my recently updated * 1.2.5 system should spawn multiple * process at seemingly random intervals? Regards L:ee ########################################### This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange. For more information, connect to http://www.f-secure.com/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

Here's a patch against 4.8-RELEASE kernel that allows disk writes on softupdates-enabled filesystems to be delayed for (theoretically) arbitrarily long periods of time. The motivation for such updating policy is surprisingly not purely suicidal - it can allow disks on laptops to spin down immediately after I/O operations and stay idle for longer periods of time, thus saving considerable amount

And here's the proof. Any list subscriber could have confirmed this mail, which never should have been send in the first friggin' place. -- "Well," Brahma said, "even after ten thousand explanations, a fool is no wiser, but an intelligent man requires only two thousand five hundred." - The Mahabharata -------------- next part -------------- An

Of course you should patch/upgrade, etc. A stopgap measure could be to use static ARP for a segment. I have done this for a long time with wireless hosts, since I'm in an urban environment with many visible nodes, some in autos, and ARP cache poisoning is a well-known DoS against wireless. You may find it extremely painful and less-than-useful to have static IP addrs, etc. for hosts.