search for: tenderly

I''ve seen http://railscasts.com/episodes/73-complex-forms-part-1, part2 and part3. It seems to be my case. I have: Company has_many :documents has_many :tenders, :through.......... and Document belongs_to :company Tender has_many :companies, :through.......... I want to insert documents and tenerds on company creation. If documents are more than one the user can click "add

Dear Tux Friends, I am migration a MS Windows 2000 file server to OpenSuse 10.3. In the current working scenerio, there is one directory on Windows Server named "Common" with two shared directories 1) Inter Department 2) Intra Department This will will help to understand the directory structure: ===>> Common-> Inter Department -> Intra

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hello everybody, first of all I want to excuse myself for crossposting. I can't estimate which mailinglist could be the right one for our concern. Struktur AG, member of the Linux Solutions Group e.V., wants to announce an Open Source tender for an implementation of an audio codec compatible with Nellymoser Asao Codec. Struktur wants to pay

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hello everybody, first of all I want to excuse myself for crossposting. I can't estimate which mailinglist could be the right one for our concern. Struktur AG, member of the Linux Solutions Group e.V., wants to announce an Open Source tender for an implementation of an audio codec compatible with Nellymoser Asao Codec. Struktur wants to pay

Dear Sir, We would lik to subscribe the support for OpenSSH for a tender project. Please kindly advise the annual subscription plan (with details of SLA) & annual fee. For the price, is it determined by number of server? or number of CPU? or number of core? Shall we get quotation/support from you? or please advise the reseller contact. Since the tender will be closed next week, may we

Dear list member, I deperately need an help in performing a MANOVA in R, but I encountered some problems both in the design and in the synthax with R. I conducted a listening experiment in which 16 participants had to rate the audio stimuli along 5 scales representing an emotion (sad, tender, neutral, happy and aggressive). Each audio stimulus was synthesized in order to represent a

On Jun 22, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Renato Golin wrote: > On 22 June 2011 19:18, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: >> Unfortunately, you have to live with this. Until recently binutils >> were quite buggy wrt thumb2 code, so, most probably you will need new >> binutils in any case. > > Hi Anton, > > It's not so simple. GPL3 can be quite a

Hi, Is FFT implemented in R takes advantage of multi-processors? I ran this benchmark from from http://www.sciviews.org, and AMD Opteron 2.2 GHz performs better than AMD Opteron 1.8 GHz on all test cases, except FFT operation. Both machines run same OSs (RedHat WS 3) and 2.2 GHz has more memory (2 GB RAM) than 1.8 GHz (1 GB RAM). The only difference is that 1.8 GHz is a dual-processor

There''s been an increasing amount of spam comments on tickets in the Rails LH. Tender ticket is here: http://help.lighthouseapp.com/discussions/problems/1791 I''ve been going through and *deleting* spam comments, as the "Mark As Spam" button appears to simply hide the comment but leave active, Google-followable links live on the page. Once a comment is marked as spam,

Dear LLVMers, Does anyone know what the latest is w.r.t a FORTRAN front-end for LLVM? Is anyone expecting to have typical f90/f95 programs compiling to LLVM this year, or next? (I'm aware of the "NAG hack" and various other f2c-type approaches, but they give me a strange feeling in my tummy.) Duraid

Hi Duraid, > Does anyone know what the latest is w.r.t a FORTRAN front-end for > LLVM? Is anyone expecting to have typical f90/f95 programs compiling to > LLVM this year, or next? (I'm aware of the "NAG hack" and various other > f2c-type approaches, but they give me a strange feeling in my tummy.) support for Fortran will be much easier once LLVM rebases itself

I just noticed this - I can't promise any particular amount of TLC, but I'll certainly be giving the Fortran front-end some attention as soon as LLVM moves to gcc 4.2. For future reference, does anyone know of a good free Fortran compiler test suite? Cheers, -mike On 5/14/07, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Hi Duraid, > > > Does anyone know what the

On Jun 22, 2011, at 4:02 PM, Damjan Marion wrote: >> >> To get -integrated-as working so that we don't need to go through the assembler at all should be mostly a matter of bug fixing, modulo inline assembly support. For non-trivial inline assembly, and to get a system assembler replacement based on the MC assembler, it'll be a bigger task. The ARM asm parser is currently in

On Jun 23, 2011, at 12:01 AM, Jim Grosbach wrote: > > On Jun 22, 2011, at 2:08 PM, Renato Golin wrote: > >> On 22 June 2011 19:18, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: >>> Unfortunately, you have to live with this. Until recently binutils >>> were quite buggy wrt thumb2 code, so, most probably you will need new >>> binutils in

Greetings list, I've been banging my head against this for a few days now, so finally I throw myself upon your tender mercies. I had rsync working fine to make offsite backups via an IPSEC VPN over an ADSL connection - until the remote raid5 server went down. It was rebuilt with RedHat 8 and since then I have not been able to rsync to it. Both ends have vanilla rsync-2.5.5 installed.

On Jun 23, 2011, at 1:13 AM, Jim Grosbach wrote: > On Jun 22, 2011, at 4:02 PM, Damjan Marion wrote: >>> >>> To get -integrated-as working so that we don't need to go through the assembler at all should be mostly a matter of bug fixing, modulo inline assembly support. For non-trivial inline assembly, and to get a system assembler replacement based on the MC assembler,

On 12/22/15 4:45 AM, Russell Wallace via llvm-dev wrote: > Oh, I just came across Function::hasAddressTaken. Maybe I can just use > that instead? You could conservatively assume that any function that has its address taken has a pointer to it that escapes into memory or external code. To make things a little more accurate, you could scan the uses of any function for which

Hi Damjan, > This sounds like a dead end as newer binutils are GPLv3. Unfortunately, you have to live with this. Until recently binutils were quite buggy wrt thumb2 code, so, most probably you will need new binutils in any case. -- With best regards, Anton Korobeynikov Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics, Saint Petersburg State University

On 22 June 2011 19:18, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > Unfortunately, you have to live with this. Until recently binutils > were quite buggy wrt thumb2 code, so, most probably you will need new > binutils in any case. Hi Anton, It's not so simple. GPL3 can be quite a nuisance to change and even to use. This is why LLVM is becoming to popular for ARM...

Switching to dovecot LMTP appears to have change the information in the received header, which appears to be causing my spam filter to wig out and mark local to local emails as spam. Here?s what the received header used to look like: Received: from [10.0.5.3] (c-71-229-144-93.hsd1.co.comcast.net [71.229.144.93]) by mail.covisp.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B67B8118AD59 for <kreme at