search for: tenacity

Hi all, I have a 5 drive RAIDZ volume with data that I''d like to recover. The long story runs roughly: 1) The volume was running fine under FreeBSD on motherboard SATA controllers. 2) Two drives were moved to a HP P411 SAS/SATA controller 3) I *think* the HP controllers wrote some volume information to the end of each disk (hence no more ZFS labels 2,3) 4) In its "auto

siamo a venerd?, anche questa settimana ? passata e devo ammettere che questo pensiero mi fa stare molto bene visto che da oggi fino a luned? passer? sicuramente dei giorni stupendi e lascier? dietro quelli appena passati che devo essere sincera mi hanno fatto girare parecchio le palle..tra lavoro e universit? poche notizie buone purtroppo....quello che mi salva sempre ? che porto una gran luce

...s if the matrix is dumped and sourced back in again. The only clue that I can offer is that it is vectors 43:50 (I think) that are NaN's and the matrix is logically of rank 50. That is, it is a covariance matrix on 75 variables using 50 observations. Hopefully, someone has the experience and tenacity to figure out what is going on here. Patrick Burns Burns Statistics patrick@burns-stat.com +44 (0)20 8525 0696 http://www.burns-stat.com (home of S Poetry and "A Guide for the Unwilling S User")

...ab is looking for a compiler enthusiast to work on LLVM bitcode obfuscation. The full job description is available here: https://quarkslab.com/#epona-engineer It's a job that requires creativity to design new code obfuscation, compiler skills to integrate them in our LLVM based compiler, tenacity to have everything run on all supported platforms and architectures (read Linux, Windows, Android, iOS, OSX with different arch variant). And a seed of crazyness when you need to debug that :-) For a more technical view of our work, have a look to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d72Snpxx4Co...

...s if the matrix is dumped and sourced back in again. The only clue that I can offer is that it is vectors 43:50 (I think) that are NaN's and the matrix is logically of rank 50. That is, it is a covariance matrix on 75 variables using 50 observations. Hopefully, someone has the experience and tenacity to figure out what is going on here. Patrick Burns Burns Statistics patrick at burns-stat.com +44 (0)20 8525 0696 http://www.burns-stat.com (home of S Poetry and "A Guide for the Unwilling S User") >______________________________________________ >R-devel at r-project.org mailing...

Dear developers, thanks to Charles (Lepple) and ESR hard work, we are now able to finalize our migration from Subversion to Git, on Alioth. As of now, our Subversion repository on Alioth<https://alioth.debian.org/scm/?group_id=30602>is FROZEN! Any new svn commit may simply be discarded, so beware! Most active developers are currently using github, as a temporary mean. But if you have any

Full_Name: cajo ter Braak Version: 2.1.1 OS: Windows Submission from: (NULL) (137.224.10.105) # I would like to attach the matrix C in the Rdata file; it is 50x50 and comes from a geostatistical problem (spherical covariogram) > rm(list=ls(all=TRUE)) > load(file= "test.eigen.Rdata") > ls() [1] "C" "eW" > > sym.check = max(abs(C - t(C))) # should

...lizing light-markup to up the quality of that output. it's also the case that some still lack full cloud support. another problem is some of 'em are not on windows... but i guess this flaw will dwindle as windows dwindles. (can you believe we starting saying that 15 years ago? sometimes the tenacity of mediocrity just amazes me.) finally, the notion that .html output is sufficient is one that is increasingly being called into question. there is, of course, a long history for .pdf. i find it quite amusing that many markdown developers consider it adequate to distribute product in .pdf form...

Hello, Iam looking for an R solution that can efficiently produce the output shown below. I can produce this easily in SAS with retain statement and a few lines of if-then-else logic, etc.. but I am not find anything similar on the Rforum archives. Below is the logic I am trying to apply to produce the output table below. Thanks in any help! if the ID is the first ID encountered then group=1 and

I am trying to implement a change to our Dialplan that will thwart tele-spammers that are calling us with blanked out caller ID. The caller IDs seem to vary between originating callers when they block caller ID. I've seen the following: "anonymous" "" So I'm checking for these. However recently one company seems to be bypassing this, so what I wanted to do was