Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "templo".
Did you mean:
temple
2009 May 21
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add new phase to legalization to handle vector operations
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote:
> Can you explain why you chose the approach of using a new pass?
> I pictured removing LegalizeDAG's type legalization code would
> mostly consist of finding all the places that use TLI.getTypeAction
> and just deleting code for handling its Expand and Promote. Are you
> anticipating something more
2009 May 20
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add new phase to legalization to handle vector operations
On May 20, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Eli Friedman wrote:
> On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Eli Friedman
> <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Per subject, this patch adding an additional pass to handle vector
>>
>> operations; the idea is that this allows removing the code from
>>
>> LegalizeDAG that handles illegal types, which should be a significant
2009 May 21
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add new phase to legalization to handle vector operations
...ngs like sextinreg V:i64 from i8.
- Hi = DAG.getNode(ISD::SRA, dl, NVT, Lo,
- DAG.getConstant(NVT.getSizeInBits()-1,
- TLI.getShiftAmountTy()));
- break;
-
- case ISD::BSWAP: {
- ExpandOp(Node->getOperand(0), Lo, Hi);
- SDValue TempLo = DAG.getNode(ISD::BSWAP, dl, NVT, Hi);
- Hi = DAG.getNode(ISD::BSWAP, dl, NVT, Lo);
- Lo = TempLo;
- break;
- }
-
- case ISD::CTPOP:
- ExpandOp(Node->getOperand(0), Lo, Hi);
- Lo = DAG.getNode(ISD::ADD, dl, NVT, // ctpop(HL) -> ctpop(H)+ctpop(L)
- DA...