search for: telenix

----- Original Message ---- > From: Chuck Robey <chuckr at telenix.org> > To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 9:22:53 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Arm port > > OK, I've got enough to go on with, and I'm getting ready right now to begin > reading the dragon book, but one question b...

Chuck Robey <chuckr at telenix.org> writes: >> Just checked that the makefiles generated by cmake work with `make' on >> FreeBSD 7.2 x86. The build fails while building `opt' because libdl is >> missing. > > They absolutely do work, even on FreeBSD-current( I run that here), > but not using...

Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Chuck Robey <chuckr at telenix.org> writes: > >>> Just checked that the makefiles generated by cmake work with `make' on >>> FreeBSD 7.2 x86. The build fails while building `opt' because libdl is >>> missing. >> They absolutely do work, even on FreeBSD-current( I run that here), &g...

Óscar Fuentes wrote: > [snip] > >> Just to clarify things: have you *tried* to build LLVM with the >> makefiles generated by cmake on your BSD system? > > Just checked that the makefiles generated by cmake work with `make' on > FreeBSD 7.2 x86. The build fails while building `opt' because libdl is > missing. > They absolutely do work, even on

Chuck Robey <chuckr at telenix.org> writes: [snip] > Someone said that maybe CMake is already compatible with BSD make, so > I quicly went into one of your Makefiles and took out the first > incompatibility I found. Means ONLY that CMake != BSD Make, that's > all. Looks to me to be a great deal more like G...

On 2009-05-24 20:38, Chuck Robey wrote: > Óscar Fuentes wrote: > >> Chuck Robey <chuckr at telenix.org> writes: >> >> >>>> Just checked that the makefiles generated by cmake work with `make' on >>>> FreeBSD 7.2 x86. The build fails while building `opt' because libdl is >>>> missing. >>>> >>> They absolu...

Samuel Crow wrote: > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- >> From: Chuck Robey <chuckr at telenix.org> >> To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> >> Sent: Friday, May 22, 2009 9:22:53 AM >> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Arm port >> >> OK, I've got enough to go on with, and I'm getting ready right now to begin >> reading the dragon...

...domain-specific language. Start by looking at llvm/lib/Target/ARM/ARMInstrInfo.td and seeing how the basic instructions are matched. For armv7/armv7a, a new file will want to be created similar to how ARMInstrVFP.td is sequestered. deep On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Chuck Robey <chuckr at telenix.org> wrote: > Christophe Avoinne wrote: >> Hi, >> >> - Cortex-A8 needs a specific instruction scheduler as dual issue forces >> you to interleave some instructions to allow to run two instructions in >> the same cycle for the best performance (Cortex-A9 is out-of...

Sandeep Patel wrote: > My goal is to have Cortex-A9 support complete in far less than three > months. I've recently gotten some additional help toward that goal, so > the pace should pick up soon. > > As far as compiler texts, there are many newer texts to recommend as > just about all the major optimization passes are done differently > after SSA-form appeared in about

Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Chuck Robey <chuckr at telenix.org> writes: > > [snip] > >> Someone said that maybe CMake is already compatible with BSD make, so >> I quicly went into one of your Makefiles and took out the first >> incompatibility I found. Means ONLY that CMake != BSD Make, that's >> all. Looks to me...

The Nokia N800 is an OMAP 2420 which is an ARM11. If you want an OMAP 3530 today, I think the cheapest route is the Beagleboard. deep On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Chuck Robey <chuckr at telenix.org> wrote: > Bob Wilson wrote: >> On May 20, 2009, at 1:38 PM, Chuck Robey wrote: >>> Hmm.  Well, my motivation is that I recently bought a Pandora (it >>> has the >>> Cortex-A8).  It's not going to arrive here for a couple more months, >>> I thi...

Török Edwin wrote: > On 2009-05-24 20:38, Chuck Robey wrote: >> Óscar Fuentes wrote: >> >>> Chuck Robey <chuckr at telenix.org> writes: >>> >>> >>>>> Just checked that the makefiles generated by cmake work with `make' on >>>>> FreeBSD 7.2 x86. The build fails while building `opt' because libdl is >>>>> missing. >>>>>...

Bob Wilson wrote: > On May 20, 2009, at 1:38 PM, Chuck Robey wrote: >> Hmm. Well, my motivation is that I recently bought a Pandora (it >> has the >> Cortex-A8). It's not going to arrive here for a couple more months, >> I think. >> When it does finally arrive, I want to be able to immediately begin >> work on >> replacing the Linux that

...of interfering dependencies, but I'm not sure it means that A8 support would be included in A9 support. For school once, I wrote a CPU emulator, and it had multiple issue. Hellacious dependency checking problems. > deep > > On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Chuck Robey <chuckr at telenix.org> wrote: >> Christophe Avoinne wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> - Cortex-A8 needs a specific instruction scheduler as dual issue forces >>> you to interleave some instructions to allow to run two instructions in >>> the same cycle for the best performa...

...concentrated in OSes when I was in school. I did get a piece of luck, and was able to pick up a copy of that great compiler book, cheaply, even (that guy didn't ever want to be reminded what compilers were!) > > deep > > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Chuck Robey <chuckr at telenix.org> wrote: >> Bob Wilson wrote: >>> On May 20, 2009, at 1:38 PM, Chuck Robey wrote: >>>> Hmm. Well, my motivation is that I recently bought a Pandora (it >>>> has the >>>> Cortex-A8). It's not going to arrive here for a couple more months...

Chuck Robey <chuckr at telenix.org> writes: > I've never asked for (and wouldn't personally contribute to) any project to > generate BSD Makefiles from CMake input. My feelings are, you generate BSD > Makefiles directly, they are NOT that complicated, and making them be generated > like that reduces the...

Hi, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > Chuck Robey <chuckr at telenix.org> writes: > > >>> Just checked that the makefiles generated by cmake work with `make' on >>> FreeBSD 7.2 x86. The build fails while building `opt' because libdl is >>> missing. >>> >> They absolutely do work, even on FreeBSD-cu...

...ortex-A9, but as all compiler testing is more easily done on an Cortex-A8 today, A8 support is implicit. What specific ISA changes are you most interested in? Are you able to develop patches if we coordinate which areas to work on? deep On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Chuck Robey <chuckr at telenix.org> wrote: > If this is the wrong list, please correct me, thanks. > > I'm trying to get a bit more information about the Arm backend for llvm.  The > precise processor I'm interested in is the TI OMAP3530 (the Cortex-A8 is the > main CPU, along with other processors onbo...

Chuck Robey <chuckr at telenix.org> writes: >> Doesn't CMake support the BSD toolchain? > > OK, I checked the llvm-2.5 Makefiles. They have constructs in them > which cannot be used in any BSD Makefile (such as the form of > conditionals: ifndef is a GNU Makeism), and won't run on any BSD Make. &gt...

If this is the wrong list, please correct me, thanks. I'm trying to get a bit more information about the Arm backend for llvm. The precise processor I'm interested in is the TI OMAP3530 (the Cortex-A8 is the main CPU, along with other processors onboard the chip). I did see that the backend for Arm has support for the V6, but I'm thinking (I could be wrong) that the Cortex-A8 is