search for: teemperor

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 26 matches for "teemperor".

Did you mean: emperor
2020 Jun 19
2
Phabricator Maintenance
...it directly and give folks outside Google access, but that is unfortunately a hard problem for a variety of reasons). I'd be happy to help to provide a DB snapshot for the migration, of course. 2. We switch to github PRs Thoughts? /Manuel On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM Raphael Isemann <teemperor at gmail.com> wrote: > Friendly ping > > Am Do., 9. Apr. 2020 um 16:04 Uhr schrieb Alexandre Ganea > <alexandre.ganea at ubisoft.com>: > > > > cc Paul / MyDeveloperDay > > > > > > > > De : llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org>...
2020 Apr 09
2
Outdated Phabricator version on reviews.llvm.org breaks Google authentication since today
cc Paul / MyDeveloperDay De : llvm-dev <llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org> De la part de David Blaikie via llvm-dev Envoyé : April 8, 2020 10:21 PM À : Raphael “Teemperor” Isemann <teemperor at gmail.com>; Manuel Klimek <klimek at google.com> Cc : llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> Objet : Re: [llvm-dev] Outdated Phabricator version on reviews.llvm.org breaks Google authentication since today hey Manuel - are you/do you know who's likely to...
2020 Jun 19
3
Phabricator Maintenance
...tunately a hard problem for a variety of reasons). I'd be happy to help to provide a DB snapshot for the migration, of course. >> >> 2. We switch to github PRs >> >> Thoughts? >> /Manuel >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM Raphael Isemann <teemperor at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Friendly ping >>> >>> Am Do., 9. Apr. 2020 um 16:04 Uhr schrieb Alexandre Ganea >>> <alexandre.ganea at ubisoft.com>: >>> > >>> > cc Paul / MyDeveloperDay >>> > >>> > &...
2020 Jun 19
4
Phabricator Maintenance
...ovide a DB snapshot for the >> migration, of course. >> >> >> >> 2. We switch to github PRs >> >> >> >> Thoughts? >> >> /Manuel >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM Raphael Isemann <teemperor at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Friendly ping >> >>> >> >>> Am Do., 9. Apr. 2020 um 16:04 Uhr schrieb Alexandre Ganea >> >>> <alexandre.ganea at ubisoft.com>: >> >>> > >> >>...
2020 Jun 19
2
Phabricator Maintenance
...ovide a DB snapshot for the >> migration, of course. >> >> >> >> 2. We switch to github PRs >> >> >> >> Thoughts? >> >> /Manuel >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM Raphael Isemann <teemperor at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Friendly ping >> >>> >> >>> Am Do., 9. Apr. 2020 um 16:04 Uhr schrieb Alexandre Ganea >> >>> <alexandre.ganea at ubisoft.com>: >> >>> > >> >>...
2020 Jun 23
2
[cfe-dev] Phabricator Maintenance
...gt;>> >> >>>> >> 2. We switch to github PRs >>>> >> >>>> >> Thoughts? >>>> >> /Manuel >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM Raphael Isemann <teemperor at gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Friendly ping >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Am Do., 9. Apr. 2020 um 16:04 Uhr schrieb Alexandre Ganea >>>> >>> <alexandre.ganea at ubisoft.com&g...
2020 Jun 19
2
Phabricator Maintenance
...gt;>> >> >>>> >> 2. We switch to github PRs >>>> >> >>>> >> Thoughts? >>>> >> /Manuel >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM Raphael Isemann <teemperor at gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Friendly ping >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Am Do., 9. Apr. 2020 um 16:04 Uhr schrieb Alexandre Ganea >>>> >>> <alexandre.ganea at ubisoft.com&g...
2020 Jun 23
2
[cfe-dev] Phabricator Maintenance
...to github PRs > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> Thoughts? > >>>>> >> /Manuel > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM Raphael Isemann < > teemperor at gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> Friendly ping > >>>>> >>> > >>>>> >>> Am Do., 9. Apr. 2020 um 16:04 Uhr schrieb Alexandre Ganea > >>>>> >>> <alex...
2020 Jun 19
5
Phabricator Maintenance
...> >> >>>>>> >> Thoughts? >> >>>>>> >> /Manuel >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >>>>>> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM Raphael Isemann < >> teemperor at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>> >>> Friendly ping >> >>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>> >>> Am Do., 9. Apr. 2020 um 16:04 Uhr schrieb Alexandre Ganea >> >&g...
2020 Jun 19
3
Phabricator Maintenance
.... We switch to github PRs >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Thoughts? >>>>>> >> /Manuel >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM Raphael Isemann <teemperor at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> Friendly ping >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> Am Do., 9. Apr. 2020 um 16:04 Uhr schrieb Alexandre Ganea >>>>>> >>> <alexandre...
2020 Apr 08
2
Outdated Phabricator version on reviews.llvm.org breaks Google authentication since today
Hi all, I’m using my Google account to log into my Phabricator account on reviews.llvm.org . Since today that no longer works as I don’t seem to get any reply from reviews.llvm.org when I’m logged into my account. It tried logging out which fixes the issue of reviews.llvm.org not loading, but when I try to login I just get the following error: > Expected to retrieve an "account"
2020 Jun 22
3
Phabricator Maintenance
.... We switch to github PRs >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Thoughts? >>>>>> >> /Manuel >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM Raphael Isemann <teemperor at gmail.com<mailto:teemperor at gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> Friendly ping >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> Am Do., 9. Apr. 2020 um 16:04 Uhr schrieb Alexandre Ganea >>>&g...
2020 Jun 22
1
Phabricator Maintenance
...t;>>>> >> Thoughts? >>> >>>>>> >> /Manuel >>> >>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>> >> >>> >>>>>> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM Raphael Isemann < >>> teemperor at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>> >>> Friendly ping >>> >>>>>> >>> >>> >>>>>> >>> Am Do., 9. Apr. 2020 um 16:04 Uhr schrieb Alexandre Ganea...
2020 Jun 24
3
[cfe-dev] Phabricator Maintenance
...;>>> >> 2. We switch to github PRs >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Thoughts? >>>>> >> /Manuel >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM Raphael Isemann <teemperor at gmail.com<mailto:teemperor at gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Friendly ping >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Am Do., 9. Apr. 2020 um 16:04 Uhr schrieb Alexandre Ganea >>>>> >>&...
2020 Jun 23
3
Phabricator Maintenance
...>> Thoughts? > >>>>>> >> /Manuel > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> > >>>>>> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM Raphael Isemann > <teemperor at gmail.com <mailto:teemperor at gmail.com>> wrote: > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> >>> Friendly ping > >>>>>> >>> > >>>>>> >>> Am...
2020 Jun 25
3
[cfe-dev] Phabricator Maintenance
...gt;>>> >> >> >>>>> >> Thoughts? >> >>>>> >> /Manuel >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM Raphael Isemann < >> teemperor at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> Friendly ping >> >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> Am Do., 9. Apr. 2020 um 16:04 Uhr schrieb Alexandre Ganea >> >>>>> &...
2020 Jun 25
2
[cfe-dev] Phabricator Maintenance
...gt;>>> >> >> >>>>> >> Thoughts? >> >>>>> >> /Manuel >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >>>>> >> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:42 PM Raphael Isemann < >> teemperor at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> Friendly ping >> >>>>> >>> >> >>>>> >>> Am Do., 9. Apr. 2020 um 16:04 Uhr schrieb Alexandre Ganea >> >>>>> &...
2017 Mar 30
2
[GSoC 2017] Clang-based diff tool project
...argc) { > } > while (false); > int funkyVariable = 1; > funkyVariable++; > } > ./clangDiff > Change: SwitchStmt moved from line 2 to line 5 > Change: IfStmt moved from line 4 to line 2 > Neat! :) > > Here is how it looks https://gist.github.com/Teemperor/b252bae4b2544f57d6bb9580a0e890e4 <https://gist.github.com/Teemperor/b252bae4b2544f57d6bb9580a0e890e4> > > Let us know if we can help you further with this! I’d be happy if you could take the lead. Johannes asked earlier how to start in clang and show his ability, any bug to fix or s...
2019 Jul 30
2
RFC: changing variable naming rules in LLVM codebase & git-blame
Is the plan for LLDB to just adapt the code that is trying to follow the new code style or also the code using the LLDB code style? I’m in general in favor of moving LLDB to the LLVM code style because it makes the LLDB code that interfaces with Clang/LLVM less awkward to write (e.g. no more code style confusion when inheriting from a Clang classes inside the LLDB code base). But I think if we do
2020 Feb 14
3
State of llgo in monorepo?
...ment in the file: > This tool lets us build LLVM components within the tree by setting up a > $GOPATH that resembles a tree fetched in the normal way with "go get". (FWIW, I had the exact same reaction as you, before realizing the above.) On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 2:46 AM Raphael “Teemperor” Isemann via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > So just to summarise what happened outside the mailing list: > * We removed llvm-go > * We also removed/fixed several things that referenced llvm-go in the > following days. > * We reverted all of that (apparently to...