search for: techinically

Displaying 18 results from an estimated 18 matches for "techinically".

Did you mean: techincally
2004 May 07
1
NAT & MASQ
Hello Tom, I seem to be missing the big picture here.. can you shed some light? I have a three interface setup loc,dmz, net I have 4 global addresses that I want to attach to eth0 (net) address 1 - fw address address 2- I want to forward to a (loc)router that uses dynamic dns vpn (gre) (Yamaha router) address 3 - web server/Bind9 (dmz)forward port 80,443,53 address 4 - mail server (dmz)pop3,
2005 Oct 18
3
Legal issues for non-profit radio stations.
Hi All, Some time ago I emailed this list and mentioned (as well as a couple of techinical queries) that I was trying to contact the PRS for information on the copyright licencing requirements of a non-profit on-line radio station, a few people expressed interest in this and asked I keep them updated. Well I just sent my third email (transcript below) informing them that I will assume a further
2004 Aug 06
2
dare to compare -- live streams: ogg/WMA
hello, I like your point here .. it's difficult to make such a comparision, since yacast.fr choosed to stream like that. Why did they choose to stream like that? That's beyond me, since Radio France has a budjet of millions. The point of this comparision was to show why is Radio France doing and paying for something like this? Me, with cheap computers which were had no more value (well,
2019 Jan 10
2
[Oddity] SAMAccountName and 20+ chars logins...
Hai Marco, What i did mean. You can have 255 chars in total with these limitation's Windows NT 4.0, Windows 95, Windows 98, and LAN Manager : 20 = sAMAccountName Windows 2000 and up : 256 chars = sAMAccountName at alias.domain.tld ( full distinguished name ) The SAM-Account-Name attribute (also known as the pre?Windows 2000 user logon name) is limited to 256 characters in the Active
2018 Apr 08
2
[RFC PATCH 2/3] netdev: kernel-only IFF_HIDDEN netdevice
From: Siwei Liu <loseweigh at gmail.com> Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 19:32:05 -0700 > And I assume everyone here understands the use case for live > migration (in the context of providing cloud service) is very > different, and we have to hide the netdevs. If not, I'm more than > happy to clarify. I think you still need to clarify. netdevs are netdevs. If they have special
2018 Apr 08
2
[RFC PATCH 2/3] netdev: kernel-only IFF_HIDDEN netdevice
From: Siwei Liu <loseweigh at gmail.com> Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 19:32:05 -0700 > And I assume everyone here understands the use case for live > migration (in the context of providing cloud service) is very > different, and we have to hide the netdevs. If not, I'm more than > happy to clarify. I think you still need to clarify. netdevs are netdevs. If they have special
2005 Oct 18
0
Legal issues for non-profit radio stations.
hi Michael Hobbs wrote: > Hi All, > > Some time ago I emailed this list and mentioned (as well as a couple of > techinical queries) that I was trying to contact the PRS for information > on the copyright licencing requirements of a non-profit on-line radio > station, a few people expressed interest in this and asked I keep them > updated. Well I just sent my third email
2004 Feb 02
1
Channel Bank
hi all ! My setup of asterisk is, INTERNAL PABX -------(bundle of Analog lines-FXS +FXO)------>Channel Bank-----------E1-------->X100P(* Box) I'm using pleidaes Channell bank currently which does the FXO+FXS to E1 conversion for me. The trouble is I'm having some call disconnection problem with this CB. And I also saw that people had techinical problem with this channel bank
2018 Apr 10
0
[RFC PATCH 2/3] netdev: kernel-only IFF_HIDDEN netdevice
...ed), while no one barely cares about ABI or API compatibility in the kernel level, as long as their applications don't break. I agree the current bypass solution for SR-IOV live migration requires guest cooperation. Though it doesn't mean guest *userspace* cooperation. As a matter of fact, techinically it shouldn't invovle userspace at all to get SR-IOV migration working. It's the kernel that does the real work. If I understand the goal of this in-kernel approach correctly, it was meant to save userspace from modification or corresponding toolstack support, as those additional 2 interface...
2001 Jul 03
2
ABR or CBR?
Just in case my quotation causeed misunderstnaing... Forget about what I quoted before. Probably, by CBR, Monty meant ABR since CBR is stupidly patented and this is the reason why Vorbis has no CBR option. If you know this, it cannot be a problem but I see there is a question asking what is ABR in the mailing list. >On Thu 28 Jun 2001, 23:27:41 PDT, Monty (xiphmont@xiph.org)Wrote: >then
2005 Oct 18
2
Legal issues for non-profit radio stations.
Of course we all know these groups would certainly not appreciate the audible distrobution of their bread and butter. However, I assume your scope is only within the U.S. , whereas personaly in Canada. Our laws governed a right to freedom of information in regards to online content. More or less, if you find it online it must be public content (unless that's been changed by now, I haven't
2018 Apr 18
2
[RFC PATCH 2/3] netdev: kernel-only IFF_HIDDEN netdevice
...cares about ABI or API compatibility in > the kernel level, as long as their applications don't break. > > I agree the current bypass solution for SR-IOV live migration requires > guest cooperation. Though it doesn't mean guest *userspace* > cooperation. As a matter of fact, techinically it shouldn't invovle > userspace at all to get SR-IOV migration working. It's the kernel that > does the real work. If I understand the goal of this in-kernel > approach correctly, it was meant to save userspace from modification > or corresponding toolstack support, as those ad...
2003 May 06
2
samba + ldap + pam_mkhomedir ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, I'm on the way to implement samba with ldap on five servers (each owns a different nt-domain) and a master server which maintains the central user database which gets replicated to all the other servers. Now I have just one more problem, namely homedirs. I want every user to have a homedir to store for example his profile. This has to
2018 Apr 18
0
[virtio-dev] Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] netdev: kernel-only IFF_HIDDEN netdevice
...API compatibility in >> the kernel level, as long as their applications don't break. >> >> I agree the current bypass solution for SR-IOV live migration requires >> guest cooperation. Though it doesn't mean guest *userspace* >> cooperation. As a matter of fact, techinically it shouldn't invovle >> userspace at all to get SR-IOV migration working. It's the kernel that >> does the real work. If I understand the goal of this in-kernel >> approach correctly, it was meant to save userspace from modification >> or corresponding toolstack supp...
2006 May 23
7
has_and_belongs_to_many question
Hello, I am trying to make the "switchover" to programming my apps in Rails and have a question about database structure. In the past i would structure a many to many like this: categories ---------------------------------------------------- | id | name | ---------------------------------------------------- 1 Some Category 2 Another
2005 Aug 25
3
'Many' packages installed - CentOS 4.1
Hi Installed my first CentOS box last night after coming from Whitebox - This is perhaps me being stupid but on install i opted for 'Custom' install as i prefer minimal and then build as i suit. I went through the list of things to install and removed everything apart from networking. Install happenned and tons of stull ended up being installed including X openoffice and the like -
2013 Mar 18
9
how to create a full-virtualization xen VM with autoyast
Hi. I want to create a full-virtualization xen VM with autoyast installation. how can i do that? and how does the configuration file to be configured? I use suse linux 11 SP2. looking forward your replay. Jing. -- View this message in context: http://xen.1045712.n5.nabble.com/how-to-create-a-full-virtualization-xen-VM-with-autoyast-tp5714901.html Sent from the Xen - User mailing
2003 Aug 20
14
Is Asterisk ready for "real" use?
Okay, I am facing a move in two months to newly renovated space. I have to decide *this week* between: A) Pull LAN and phone cables, prepare to move and expand our "traditional" PBX (Panasonic KX-TD1232 and VPS200). or B) Pull only LAN cables, go VoIP, use Asterisk as PBX. It is *not* an option to purchase a VoIP system package from Cisco, 3com, etc. Installers are getting an