Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "techbase".
Did you mean:
declbase
2009 May 24
3
[LLVMdev] Building LLVM with cmake on FreeBSD
...the makefiles generated by cmake use the subset of
features that is shared by BSD make and GNU make
(http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2004-March/004881.html), so
building with either BSD make or GNU make should work.
However, I also noticed that KDE4 uses CMake these days and on a page
(http://techbase.kde.org/Getting_Started/Build/KDE4/FreeBSD) that
describes building on FreeBSD it says "Sometimes, building with *make*
can fail on some modules. You should try using *gmake* instead." So
perhaps YMMV...
Regards,
Paul
2009 May 25
0
[LLVMdev] Building LLVM with cmake on FreeBSD
...ke use the subset of
> features that is shared by BSD make and GNU make
> (http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2004-March/004881.html), so
> building with either BSD make or GNU make should work.
>
> However, I also noticed that KDE4 uses CMake these days and on a page
> (http://techbase.kde.org/Getting_Started/Build/KDE4/FreeBSD) that
> describes building on FreeBSD it says "Sometimes, building with *make*
> can fail on some modules. You should try using *gmake* instead." So
> perhaps YMMV...
Let me explain a bit. Things that are part of FreeBSD ports are buil...
2009 Jun 20
2
More then one version of KDE
Hello,
Is it possible to have more then one version of KDE installed and switch
between them? I'd like to try out the new KDE but don't want to lose what I
have now. Thnx
--
Regards
Robert
Linux User #296285
http://counter.li.org
2009 May 23
0
[LLVMdev] Building LLVM with cmake on FreeBSD
Chuck Robey <chuckr at telenix.org> writes:
>> Just checked that the makefiles generated by cmake work with `make' on
>> FreeBSD 7.2 x86. The build fails while building `opt' because libdl is
>> missing.
>
> They absolutely do work, even on FreeBSD-current( I run that here),
> but not using the native make (the one built as part of "make world"
2009 May 23
3
[LLVMdev] Building LLVM with cmake on FreeBSD
Óscar Fuentes wrote:
> [snip]
>
>> Just to clarify things: have you *tried* to build LLVM with the
>> makefiles generated by cmake on your BSD system?
>
> Just checked that the makefiles generated by cmake work with `make' on
> FreeBSD 7.2 x86. The build fails while building `opt' because libdl is
> missing.
>
They absolutely do work, even on
2012 Dec 08
20
[Bug 2050] New: Support XDG basedir specification
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2050
Bug ID: 2050
Summary: Support XDG basedir specification
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: -current
Hardware: Other
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: Miscellaneous
2008 Jul 01
13
[ANNOUNCE] Samba 3.2.0 Available for Download
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
==============================================================
"Patience is the companion of wisdom."
Saint Augustine
==============================================================
Release Announcements
=====================
This is the first stable release of Samba 3.2.0.
Please be aware that Samba is now distributed under
2008 Jul 01
13
[ANNOUNCE] Samba 3.2.0 Available for Download
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
==============================================================
"Patience is the companion of wisdom."
Saint Augustine
==============================================================
Release Announcements
=====================
This is the first stable release of Samba 3.2.0.
Please be aware that Samba is now distributed under
2009 May 25
2
[LLVMdev] Building LLVM with cmake on FreeBSD
...t;> features that is shared by BSD make and GNU make
>> (http://www.cmake.org/pipermail/cmake/2004-March/004881.html), so
>> building with either BSD make or GNU make should work.
>>
>> However, I also noticed that KDE4 uses CMake these days and on a page
>> (http://techbase.kde.org/Getting_Started/Build/KDE4/FreeBSD) that
>> describes building on FreeBSD it says "Sometimes, building with *make*
>> can fail on some modules. You should try using *gmake* instead." So
>> perhaps YMMV...
>>
>
> [snip]
>
> It's NOT poss...