Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "td18747589".
2008 Dec 26
2
[LLVMdev] Unwinds gone missing
...e documentation about LLVM's exception
> handling
> and it sounded ideal for my needs. How much of it does not work as the
> docs
> imply?
>
Jon, I ran into this issue in September and re-ignited this discussion in
another thread, here:
http://www.nabble.com/Unwinds-Gone-Wild-td18747589.html
http://www.nabble.com/Unwinds-Gone-Wild-td18747589.html
I too had been quite excited by reading the documentation. Unfortunately, it
seems "unwind" does nothing at all - it compiles into a no-op. So you have
to use the lower-level functions in libgcc. I've never figured out how...
2008 Dec 23
0
[LLVMdev] Unwinds gone missing
On Friday 19 December 2008 07:45:27 Talin wrote:
> I understand that "unwind" is currently unimplemented...
Is it? I was just reading the documentation about LLVM's exception handling
and it sounded ideal for my needs. How much of it does not work as the docs
imply?
> and will remain so for the forseeable future...
Surely C++-style exception handling is a priority? What
2008 Dec 26
0
[LLVMdev] Unwinds gone missing
...ndling
>> and it sounded ideal for my needs. How much of it does not work as
>> the
>> docs
>> imply?
>>
>
> Jon, I ran into this issue in September and re-ignited this
> discussion in
> another thread, here:
> http://www.nabble.com/Unwinds-Gone-Wild-td18747589.html
> http://www.nabble.com/Unwinds-Gone-Wild-td18747589.html
>
> I too had been quite excited by reading the documentation.
> Unfortunately, it
> seems "unwind" does nothing at all - it compiles into a no-op. So
> you have
> to use the lower-level functions in l...
2008 Dec 19
4
[LLVMdev] Unwinds gone missing
After much delay, I have finally reached the point in my work where I
need to implement some kind of exception handling. I understand that
"unwind" is currently unimplemented and will remain so for the
forseeable future.
In the mean time, are there any examples available for implementing Java
or Python-style exceptions using __cxa_throw or something similar? I've
read and
2009 Jun 15
6
[LLVMdev] unwind/invoke design
...since LLVM was clearly intended to function as a
SSA backend.
I would ask that the documentation for unwind be updated to reflect
that this operation does not actually exist. Such a warning would have
saved me two weeks of wasted implementation effort.
[1] http://www.nabble.com/Unwinds-Gone-Wild-td18747589.html