Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "tcpp".
Did you mean:
cpp
2008 May 14
3
tcptop_snv connp->conn_tcp != connp->conn_proto_priv.cp_tcp
Tried to start up tcptop_snv on snv87 x86 and got
<i>dtrace: failed to compile script /dev/fd/11: line 168: conn_tcp is not a member of struct conn_s</i>
Line 288 has this line:
<i>this->tcpp = (tcp_t *)this->connp->conn_tcp;</i>
which, after looking at line 168 of <a href="http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/uts/common/inet/ipclassifier.h">ipclassifier.h</a> (#define conn_tcp conn_proto_priv.cp_tcp) I changed to
<i>this-...
2006 Jan 24
13
Nortel Meridian Opt 81C and PRI
We've been trying unsuccessfully to connect our Meridian Option 81C to a
TE110P via PRI. We've followed the directions in
asterisk-meridian-a1.pdf (link on
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+legacy+integration), but it
doesn't seem to work on our 81C (even though many, many users report it
works very well on Option 11's).
Has anyone had any success in getting the above
2007 Feb 13
4
Nortel 81C MSDL Trunking to Asterisk TE110P, Nortel Resetting PRI Channels
...ISDN YES
MODE PRA
IFC ESS5
SBN NO
PNI 00001
SRVC NNSF
NCNA YES
NCRD YES
CHTY BCH
CTYP CDP
INAC YES
ISAR NO
CPUB OFF
DAPC NO
BCOT 0
DSEL VOD
PTYP PRI
AUTO NO
DNIS NO
DCDR NO
ICOG IAO
SRCH LIN
TRMB YES
STEP
ACOD 7930
TCPP NO
PII NO
TARG
CLEN 1
BILN NO
OABS
INST
IDC NO
DCNO 0 *
NDNO 0
DEXT NO
ANTK
SIGO STD
ICIS YES
TIMR ICF 512
OGF 512
EOD 13952
NRD 10112
DDL 70
ODT 4096
RGV 640
GRD 896
SFB 3
NBS 2048
NBL 4096
IENB 5
T...
2004 Oct 08
6
clean install with 3 ip addresses
...domain #TCP DNS from
#the Firewall
ACCEPT dmz:69.17.65.22 net udp domain #UDP DNS to
#the Internet
ACCEPT dmz:69.17.65.22 net tcp domain #TCPP DNS to
#the Internet
#the Internet
#server 2
ACCEPT net dmz:69.17.65.161 tcp smtp #Mail from
#Inter...
2004 Sep 11
5
Bridge Interface without an IP Address?
We are using Shorewall 2.0.8 with SuSE 9.1 and have built a bridging
firewall primarily to defend against syn flood and smurf DoS attacks.
We are a small ISP using Cisco routers for a total of 5-6 subnets.
Since bridges are based on use of MAC addresses, if we could use one
bridging firewall system instead of 5-6 ... is this possible? practical?
(Other than introducing a single point of failure