Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "tcp46".
Did you mean:
tcp4
2002 Jul 28
2
IPv4/v6 socket problem on BSD
...that fail to do so and rely on the old IPv4 mapped addresses will
end up handling IPv6 only.
Symptoms on typical IPv6-enabled but only IPv4-connected hosts are
that the daemon appears to be running fine but can't be reached.
netstat -a will show a protocol type of tcp6 instead of the expected
tcp46.
Workarounds for IPv4-only users include specifying an appropriate
--address or building rsync with --disable-ipv6.
Currently, rsync in daemon mode is only designed to read from a single
socket. Extending this to two sockets will require a bit of reworking,
e.g. introducing a select(2) loop. Th...
2002 Jan 12
2
Error Message!!
When rsync starts I get the following messages in my log file
Jan 11 11:00:04 WEB1 rsyncd[31281]: rsync: bind failed on port 873
Jan 11 11:00:04 WEB1 rsyncd[31281]: rsync error: error in socket IO (code
10) at socket.c(361)
Anybody know what might be causing this?
David
2007 Dec 24
0
Fwd: Re: IPFW: Blocking me out. How to debug?
...*.*
> LISTEN
>tcp4 0 0 localhost.locald.8005 *.*
> LISTEN
>tcp4 0 0 *.9008 *.*
> LISTEN
>tcp4 0 0 *.8009 *.*
> LISTEN
>tcp46 0 0 *.https *.*
> LISTEN
>tcp46 0 0 *.http *.*
> LISTEN
>tcp4 0 0 *.9080 *.*
> LISTEN
>tcp4 0 0 *.8180 *.*...
2007 Dec 20
1
IPFW: Blocking me out. How to debug?
Dear W.D.
Do you understand that by adding the rules into kernel space numbered from zero to sixty five thousand five hundred thirty four
you may alter the behavior of the rule number sixty five thousand five hundred thirty five
can you please define and list the goals you are trying to achieve by altering default rule in the terms you can both explain and understand.
----- Original Message
2007 Dec 13
3
IPFW compiled in kernel: Where is it reading the config?
Hi peeps,
After compiling ipfw into the new 6.2 kernel, and typing "ipfw list",
all I get is:
"65535 deny ip from any to any"
From reading the docs, this might indicate that this is the
default rule. (I am certainly protected this way--but can't
be very productive ;^) )
By the way, when I run "man ipfw" I get nothing. Using this
instead: