Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "tcontainers".
Did you mean:
containers
2006 Apr 26
0
[LLVMdev] Re: Newbie questions
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 16:32 -0500, Chris Lattner wrote:
> I still don't follow. Having annotations on the IR is *exactly*
> equivalant to having a map from IR objects to the things you want to
> annotate them with.
>
> Why isn't this just as acceptable (and problematic) as annotations?
Because LLVM doesn't store that map, someone else has to. Furthermore,
LLVM
2006 Apr 26
5
[LLVMdev] Re: Newbie questions
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006, Archie Cobbs wrote:
>>> With no annotation support, it doesn't seem like you can. This is
>>> the problem. I'm not saying annotations are good, just that they
>>> represent one (sub-optimal) solution to the problem. Without them,
>>> we have zero solutions to the problem.
>>
>> Why do you believe this?
>
> Sorry,