search for: tbd

Hi @ll, Over the past years I have been looking into how to reduce the size of the SDK that ships with Xcode and how to improve build times for the overall OS inside Apple. The result is a tool called TAPI, which is used at Apple for all things related to text-based dynamic library files (.tbd). What are text-based dynamic library files? Text-based dynamic library files (TBDs) are a textual representation of the information in a dynamic library / shared library that is required by the static linker - basically a symbol list of the exported symbols. Apple’s SDKs originally used Mach-O D...

I'm not really clear on the actual benefits of the TBD file, and why Apple migrated to them in the first place. Shouldn't a dynamic library containing only the relevant parts (e.g. the dynamic symbol table) be roughly comparable in size? And, much simpler to support? I assume that's effectively what "Mach-O Dynamic Library Stubs" actu...

> On Apr 9, 2018, at 3:23 PM, James Y Knight via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I'm not really clear on the actual benefits of the TBD file, and why Apple migrated to them in the first place. Shouldn't a dynamic library containing only the relevant parts (e.g. the dynamic symbol table) be roughly comparable in size? And, much simpler to support? I assume that's effectively what "Mach-O Dynamic Library Stubs" actu...

Was there any progress in the upstreaming effort? I'd be interested in having lld be able to link against tbd files, and I think it'd be cool if libtool -static could write tbd files (similar to thin archives on linux) since that should make archiving much faster. Juergen, maybe uploading your initial patch to phabricator instead of attaching might get more traction? On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 8:53 AM J...

On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 10:11 PM, John Ericson via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Regardless of any of that, given that TBD files _are_ an integral part > of the apple platform, supporting them is certainly a necessity in order to > have a working apple linker. So, if making LLD work for Apple/MachO is the > justification for adding TBD support to LLVM, that seems self-evidently a > reasonable thing to do. O...

...e there are a few of us interested in this then. I new > around here and don't really know how decisions are made, so > what's next? Just open a diff with the entire library?? > > John > > On 04/10/2018 05:33 PM, Jake Ehrlich wrote: >> Benifits of TBD: >> 1) It's human readable and diffs on TBDs correspond to changes in >> the ABI. Diffs can be automatically added to review processes to >> ensure that changes to the ABI are reviewed. The TBDs also >> document your precise ABI. >> 2) The size...

...that would include > Juergen's original code and the new ELF code. > > On Thu, Sep 20, 2018 at 10:45 AM Nico Weber <thakis at chromium.org> wrote: > >> Was there any progress in the upstreaming effort? I'd be interested in >> having lld be able to link against tbd files, and I think it'd be cool if >> libtool -static could write tbd files (similar to thin archives on linux) >> since that should make archiving much faster. >> >> Juergen, maybe uploading your initial patch to phabricator instead of >> attaching might get more...

Seems like there are a few of us interested in this then. I new around here and don't really know how decisions are made, so what's next? Just open a diff with the entire library?? John On 04/10/2018 05:33 PM, Jake Ehrlich wrote: > Benifits of TBD: > 1) It's human readable and diffs on TBDs correspond to changes in the > ABI. Diffs can be automatically added to review processes to ensure > that changes to the ABI are reviewed. The TBDs also document your > precise ABI. > 2) The size is smaller which means they can be sh...

Benifits of TBD: 1) It's human readable and diffs on TBDs correspond to changes in the ABI. Diffs can be automatically added to review processes to ensure that changes to the ABI are reviewed. The TBDs also document your precise ABI. 2) The size is smaller which means they can be shipped in an SDK instead of b...

...N encrypt passwords = Yes update encrypted = Yes password server = 192.168.1.5 So they make use of the PDC for smbmount and smbsh applications. The W2K box also uses Samba at the PDC. I want to set up a Redhat 8 box as a BDC. smbpasswd -S got the machine ID informationa across to the secrets.tbd per the BDC howto. Later it the document, it says I have to blindly copy the secrets.tbd from the PDC to the BDC. It also says I have to change from "security = DOMAIN" to "security = USER" This appears to indicate that the BDC will now use it's own authentication informa...

...; Over the past years I have been looking into how to reduce the size of the > SDK that ships with Xcode and how to improve build times for the overall OS > inside Apple. The result is a tool called TAPI, which is used at Apple for > all things related to text-based dynamic library files (.tbd). > > *What are text-based dynamic library files?* > Text-based dynamic library files (TBDs) are a textual representation of > the information in a dynamic library / shared library that is required by > the static linker - basically a symbol list of the exported symbols. > > Ap...

...; wrote: > Seems like there are a few of us interested in this then. I new around > here and don't really know how decisions are made, so what's next? Just > open a diff with the entire library?? > > John > On 04/10/2018 05:33 PM, Jake Ehrlich wrote: > > Benifits of TBD: > 1) It's human readable and diffs on TBDs correspond to changes in the ABI. > Diffs can be automatically added to review processes to ensure that changes > to the ABI are reviewed. The TBDs also document your precise ABI. > 2) The size is smaller which means they can be shipped in...

> Regardless of any of that, given that TBD files _are_ an integral part of the apple platform, supporting them is certainly a necessity in order to have a working apple linker. So, if making LLD work for Apple/MachO is the justification for adding TBD support to LLVM, that seems self-evidently a reasonable thing to do. On the other hand...

We have two solaris 9 boxes with Samba 3.0.20, which authenticate against a solaris 8 box with Samba 2.2.8a. My question is about the /usr/local/samba/private files secret.tbd and smbpasswd. We initially copied the smbpasswd from the 2.2.8a to the newer ones, but it is not often kept up to date. I was getting ready to work on setting up CFENGINE to keep the files in sync when I was just told that I should simply empty the smbpasswd files, as the authentication is done...

I am trying to integrate a Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 server into our Windows 2003 domain. I was able to successfully join it to our domain, but the WBINFO commands keep failing when I start SMB and WINBIND. I looked at the log files and found this interesting entry in the /var/log/samba/winbindd.log file: [2006/11/29 21:49:11, 1] nsswitch/winbindd.c:main(864) winbindd version 3.0.10-1.4E.9

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 5:33 PM Jake Ehrlich via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Benifits of TBD: > 1) It's human readable and diffs on TBDs correspond to changes in the ABI. > Diffs can be automatically added to review processes to ensure that changes > to the ABI are reviewed. The TBDs also document your precise ABI. > 2) The size is smaller which means they can be shipped in...

Hello, I don't know if this is the correct channel to ask questions about samba configuration errors so I apologize if it is not. I recently installed samba 2.2.2 on an IRIX 5.3 machine and everytime I run the command smbpasswd -j <DOMAIN> I receive the error: tdb(/usr/local/samba/private/secrets.tdb): tdb_oob len 1111638618 beyond eof at 8192 Unable to write the machine account

Hello, I'm reposting a previous problem that got off the mailing list. I'm now using samba-2.2.4 but still on an IRIX 5.3 machine. When I preform: smbpasswd -j <DOMAIN> I receive the error: tdb(/usr/local/samba/private/secrets.tdb): tdb_oob len 1111638618 beyond eof at 8192 Unable to write the machine account password for machine <Server NetBIOS name> in domain

Hey there, I am using LDAP (without winbind, couldn't get it to work correctly for whatever reason...) to store both local users as well as the samba users for my Samba domain. I'm curious, what is necessary to migrate from one samba domain to another seamlessly... ie, so people don't log in to their computer and all of a sudden have new user profiles.

Hi ! il want tow have one ldap backend and tow instance domain in the same server. tow question : 1 - when i start the first instance domain1 i get a SID witch is put to secrets.tbd file. but when i start the second one it detect the SID in secrets file and so don't create an other. how can i differenttiate the secrets.tbd file for each instance refered to a different smb.conf file and a particular domain ? 2 - this one is related to the first question:...