Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "tayree".
2017 Apr 04
3
[inline-asm][asm-goto] Supporting "asm goto" in inline assembly
...er Carruth [mailto:chandlerc at gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2017 23:22
To: Yatsina, Marina <marina.yatsina at intel.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org; rnk at google.com; jyknight at google.com; ehsan at mozilla.com; rjmccall at apple.com; mehdi.amini at apple.com; matze at braunis.de; Tayree, Coby <coby.tayree at intel.com>
Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [inline-asm][asm-goto] Supporting "asm goto" in inline assembly
Just responding to the motivation stuff as that remains an open question:
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 4:44 PM Yatsina, Marina <marina.yatsina at intel.com<mai...
2017 Apr 04
4
[inline-asm][asm-goto] Supporting "asm goto" in inline assembly
...knight at google.com <mailto:jyknight at google.com>; ehsan at mozilla.com <mailto:ehsan at mozilla.com>; rjmccall at apple.com <mailto:rjmccall at apple.com>; mehdi.amini at apple.com <mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>; matze at braunis.de <mailto:matze at braunis.de>; Tayree, Coby <coby.tayree at intel.com <mailto:coby.tayree at intel.com>>
>
>
> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] [inline-asm][asm-goto] Supporting "asm goto" in inline assembly
>
>
>
>
> Just responding to the motivation stuff as that remains an open question:
&...
2017 Apr 04
1
[inline-asm][asm-goto] Supporting "asm goto" in inline assembly
...lerc at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 30, 2017 23:22
> *To:* Yatsina, Marina <marina.yatsina at intel.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org;
> rnk at google.com; jyknight at google.com; ehsan at mozilla.com; rjmccall at apple.com;
> mehdi.amini at apple.com; matze at braunis.de; Tayree, Coby <
> coby.tayree at intel.com>
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [llvm-dev] [inline-asm][asm-goto] Supporting "asm goto" in
> inline assembly
>
>
>
> Just responding to the motivation stuff as that remains an open question:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017...
2017 Mar 30
3
[inline-asm][asm-goto] Supporting "asm goto" in inline assembly
Linux kernel is using the “asm goto” feature, other projects probably use it as well. I think it provides motivation to support it in LLVM.
Regarding the complexity, I believe there is some infrastructure that we can at least partially reuse (the support for “indirectbr” instruction).
My focus is adding “asm goto” support, the other things are indeed completely orthogonal and came up in bugs