Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "tauth".
Did you mean:
auth
2015 Jun 21
3
dovecot auth using 100% CPU
...0.000000 lseek(19, 0, SEEK_CUR) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek)
0.000057 getsockname(19, {sa_family=AF_LOCAL, NULL}, [2]) = 0
0.000043 epoll_ctl(15, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, 19, {EPOLLIN|EPOLLPRI|EPOLLERR|EPOLLHUP, {u32=850618928, u64=140128453618224}}) = 0
0.000040 write(19, "VERSION\tauth-worker\t1\t0\nDBHASH\t5"..., 97) = -1 EPIPE (Broken pipe)
0.000035 --- SIGPIPE {si_signo=SIGPIPE, si_code=SI_USER, si_pid=17956, si_uid=108} ---
0.000020 epoll_wait(15, {{EPOLLIN|EPOLLHUP, {u32=850618928, u64=140128453618224}}}, 14, 12614) = 1
0.000031 read(19, "", 819...
2015 Jun 21
0
dovecot auth using 100% CPU
...0, SEEK_CUR) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek)
> 0.000057 getsockname(19, {sa_family=AF_LOCAL, NULL}, [2]) = 0
> 0.000043 epoll_ctl(15, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, 19,
> {EPOLLIN|EPOLLPRI|EPOLLERR|EPOLLHUP, {u32=850618928,
> u64=140128453618224}}) = 0
> 0.000040 write(19, "VERSION\tauth-worker\t1\t0\nDBHASH\t5"..., 97)
> = -1 EPIPE (Broken pipe)
> 0.000035 --- SIGPIPE {si_signo=SIGPIPE, si_code=SI_USER,
> si_pid=17956, si_uid=108} ---
> 0.000020 epoll_wait(15, {{EPOLLIN|EPOLLHUP, {u32=850618928,
> u64=140128453618224}}}, 14, 12614) = 1
> 0.000...
2020 May 26
2
doveadm: extra lines?
Hello,
I?m sending doveadm ?kick? commands to doveadm-server via the doveadm protocol. When ?kick? sends back a NOTFOUND error, though, it?s sending back additional output. strace shows:
write(3<UNIX:[3158354->3156665]>, "\t\tkick\tmyssltest\n", 17) = 17
...
read(3<UNIX:[3158354->3156665]>, "\n-NOTFOUND\n\n-\n", 8192) = 14
Going by the protocol
2020 May 27
0
doveadm: extra lines?
...xd
0000000: 2b0a 0a2d 5553 4147 450a 0a2d 0a0a 2d4e +..-USAGE..-..-N
0000010: 4f54 464f 554e 440a 0a2d 0a OTFOUND..-.
Here is an ?auth?/?lookup? and a ?kick?, both of which fail, but only the ?kick? gives back an error code:
> echo -ne 'VERSION\tdoveadm-server\t1\t0\nD\tharry\tauth\tlookup\nD\t\tkick\tharry\n' | nc -U /var/run/dovecot/doveadm-server | xxd
0000000: 2b0a 0a2d 0a0a 2d4e 4f54 464f 554e 440a +..-..-NOTFOUND.
0000010: 0a2d 0a .-.
I?m seeing this with 2.3.9.3. I?m going to try to recompile with some debug statements and see wha...
2004 Jun 15
1
fit.mult.impute and quantile regression
I have a largish dataset (1025) with around .15 of the data missing at random overall, but more like .25 in the dependent variable. I am interested in modelling the data using quantile regression, but do not know how to do this with multiply imputed data (which is what the dataset seems to need). The original plan was to use qr (or whatever) from the quantreg package as the 'fitter'