search for: tatuvaaj

Hello all, I have replaced the llvm-gcc shipped with the Xcode by the latest version and I was wondering if I have missed something... (everything *seems* to work). Here's what I did: 0. Checkout LLVM (and clang) + llvm-gcc 1. Build LLVM (with clang) and install into /Developer/usr/local : # mkdir llvmobj # cd llvmobj # CC=gcc-4.2 CXX=g++-4.2 ../llvm/configure

Hi, I don't know enough C to know for certain if this is a programmer or compiler error: In a Objective-C source file I have: . static const char sessionEntriesKVO = ' '; . Later I use that variable as a ID by taking it's address like this: [feedManager addObserver:self forKeyPath:@"sessionEntriesCount" options:0 context:&sessionEntriesKVO]; and later . if

Hi, I don't know enough C to know for certain if this is a programmer or compiler error: In a Objective-C source file I have: . static const char sessionEntriesKVO = ' '; . Later I use that variable as a ID by taking it's address like this: [feedManager addObserver:self forKeyPath:@"sessionEntriesCount" options:0 context:&sessionEntriesKVO]; and later . if

On 15.10.2008, at 3.42, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Oct 14, 2008, at 12:52 PM, Tatu Vaajalahti wrote: > >> >> Hi, >> >> I don't know enough C to know for certain if this is a programmer or >> compiler error: > > Hi Tatu, > > With this information it is impossible to tell if it is your fault or > llvm's fault. Please file a bug with a

On 15.10.2008, at 14.01, Pertti Kellomäki wrote: > Tatu Vaajalahti wrote: >> With this program llvm-gcc -O2 optimizes test2 away even though it's >> address is taken in program (gcc-4.2 does not, neither does llvm-gcc >> with -O or -O0): >> >> >> #include <stdio.h> >> >> static const char test1 = 'x'; >> static const char

On 15.10.2008, at 16.43, Duncan Sands wrote: >> True, but note that it is the address of a variable that is used, not >> the value. > > Yes, but why do you think they should get a different address? I can > understand that it is surprising that they do, but determining whether > this is legal or not requires reading the language standard. > Hopefully > a language